Role of the transcriptional regulator SP140 in resistance to bacterial infections via repression of type I interferons

  1. Daisy X Ji
  2. Kristen C Witt
  3. Dmitri I Kotov
  4. Shally R Margolis
  5. Alexander Louie
  6. Victoria Chevée
  7. Katherine J Chen
  8. Moritz Gaidt
  9. Harmandeep S Dhaliwal
  10. Angus Y Lee
  11. Stephen L Nishimura
  12. Dario S Zamboni
  13. Igor Kramnik
  14. Daniel A. Portnoy
  15. K Heran Darwin
  16. Russell E Vance  Is a corresponding author
  1. UC Berkeley, United States
  2. University of California, Berkeley, United States
  3. University of California at San Francisco, United States
  4. University of São Paulo, Brazil
  5. Boston University, Boston University School of Medicine, United States
  6. New York University Robert Grossman School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Type I interferons (IFNs) are essential for anti-viral immunity, but often impair protective immune responses during bacterial infections. An important question is how type I IFNs are strongly induced during viral infections, and yet are appropriately restrained during bacterial infections. The Super susceptibility to tuberculosis 1 (Sst1) locus in mice confers resistance to diverse bacterial infections. Here we provide evidence that Sp140 is a gene encoded within the Sst1 locus that represses type I IFN transcription during bacterial infections. We generated Sp140-/- mice and find they are susceptible to infection by Legionella pneumophila and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Susceptibility of Sp140-/- mice to bacterial infection was rescued by crosses to mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (Ifnar-/-). Our results implicate Sp140 as an important negative regulator of type I IFNs that is essential for resistance to bacterial infections.

Data availability

RNA-seq data is available at GEO, accession number GSE166114. Amplicon sequencing data is available at the SRA, BioProject accession number PRJNA698382

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Daisy X Ji

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Kristen C Witt

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8744-9457
  3. Dmitri I Kotov

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7843-1503
  4. Shally R Margolis

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Alexander Louie

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Victoria Chevée

    Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Katherine J Chen

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Moritz Gaidt

    Molecular and Cell Biology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Harmandeep S Dhaliwal

    Cancer Research Laboratory, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Angus Y Lee

    Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Stephen L Nishimura

    Pathology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Dario S Zamboni

    Cell Biology, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7856-7512
  13. Igor Kramnik

    The National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Department of Medicine, Boston University, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6511-9246
  14. Daniel A. Portnoy

    Cancer Research Laboratory, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. K Heran Darwin

    Department of Microbiology, New York University Robert Grossman School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Russell E Vance

    Division of Immunology and Pathogenesis, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    rvance@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    Russell E Vance, consults for Ventus Therapeutics.Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6686-3912

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R37AI075039)

  • Russell E Vance

National Institutes of Health (R01AI155634)

  • Russell E Vance

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Investigator Award)

  • Russell E Vance

National Institutes of Health (P01AI066302)

  • Russell E Vance

National Institutes of Health (P01AI066302)

  • Daniel A. Portnoy

National Institutes of Health (R01HL134183)

  • Stephen L Nishimura

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christina L Stallings, Washington University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Animal studies were approved by the UC Berkeley Animal Care and Use Committee (current protocol number: AUP-2014-09-6665-2).

Version history

  1. Received: February 6, 2021
  2. Accepted: June 20, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 21, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 1, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Ji et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,225
    views
  • 496
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Daisy X Ji
  2. Kristen C Witt
  3. Dmitri I Kotov
  4. Shally R Margolis
  5. Alexander Louie
  6. Victoria Chevée
  7. Katherine J Chen
  8. Moritz Gaidt
  9. Harmandeep S Dhaliwal
  10. Angus Y Lee
  11. Stephen L Nishimura
  12. Dario S Zamboni
  13. Igor Kramnik
  14. Daniel A. Portnoy
  15. K Heran Darwin
  16. Russell E Vance
(2021)
Role of the transcriptional regulator SP140 in resistance to bacterial infections via repression of type I interferons
eLife 10:e67290.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67290

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67290

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Thomas Morgan Li, Victoria Zyulina ... Theresa T Lu
    Research Article Updated

    The autoimmune disease lupus erythematosus (lupus) is characterized by photosensitivity, where even ambient ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure can lead to development of inflammatory skin lesions. We have previously shown that Langerhans cells (LCs) limit keratinocyte apoptosis and photosensitivity via a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17)-mediated release of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligands and that LC ADAM17 sheddase activity is reduced in lupus. Here, we sought to understand how the lupus skin environment contributes to LC ADAM17 dysfunction and, in the process, differentiate between effects on LC ADAM17 sheddase function, LC ADAM17 expression, and LC numbers. We show through transcriptomic analysis a shared IFN-rich environment in non-lesional skin across human lupus and three murine models: MRL/lpr, B6.Sle1yaa, and imiquimod (IMQ) mice. IFN-I inhibits LC ADAM17 sheddase activity in murine and human LCs, and IFNAR blockade in lupus model mice restores LC ADAM17 sheddase activity, all without consistent effects on LC ADAM17 protein expression or LC numbers. Anti-IFNAR-mediated LC ADAM17 sheddase function restoration is associated with reduced photosensitive responses that are dependent on EGFR signaling and LC ADAM17. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a known mediator of ADAM17 activity; we show that UVR-induced LC ROS production is reduced in lupus model mice, restored by anti-IFNAR, and is cytoplasmic in origin. Our findings suggest that IFN-I promotes photosensitivity at least in part by inhibiting UVR-induced LC ADAM17 sheddase function and raise the possibility that anifrolumab ameliorates lupus skin disease in part by restoring this function. This work provides insight into IFN-I-mediated disease mechanisms, LC regulation, and a potential mechanism of action for anifrolumab in lupus.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Xiaochan Xu, Bjarke Frost Nielsen, Kim Sneppen
    Research Article

    SARS-CoV-2 induces delayed type-I/III interferon production, allowing it to escape the early innate immune response. The delay has been attributed to a deficiency in the ability of cells to sense viral replication upon infection, which in turn hampers activation of the antiviral state in bystander cells. Here, we introduce a cellular automaton model to investigate the spatiotemporal spreading of viral infection as a function of virus and host-dependent parameters. The model suggests that the considerable person-to-person heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 infections is a consequence of high sensitivity to slight variations in biological parameters near a critical threshold. It further suggests that within-host viral proliferation can be curtailed by the presence of remarkably few cells that are primed for IFN production. Thus, the observed heterogeneity in defense readiness of cells reflects a remarkably cost-efficient strategy for protection.