Modelling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish

  1. Yann Roussel
  2. Stephanie F Gaudreau
  3. Emily R Kacer
  4. Mohini Sengupta
  5. Tuan V Bui  Is a corresponding author
  1. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. University of Ottawa, Canada
  3. Washington University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Many spinal circuits dedicated to locomotor control have been identified in the developing zebrafish. How these circuits operate together to generate the various swimming movements during development remains to be clarified. In this study, we iteratively built models of developing zebrafish spinal circuits coupled to simplified musculoskeletal models that reproduce coiling and swimming movements. The neurons of the models were based upon morphologically or genetically identified populations in the developing zebrafish spinal cord. We simulated intact spinal circuits as well as circuits with silenced neurons or altered synaptic transmission to better understand the role of specific spinal neurons. Analysis of firing patterns and phase relationships helped identify possible mechanisms underlying the locomotor movements of developing zebrafish. Notably, our simulations demonstrated how the site and the operation of rhythm generation could transition between coiling and swimming. The simulations also underlined the importance of contralateral excitation to multiple tail beats. They allowed us to estimate the sensitivity of spinal locomotor networks to motor command amplitude, synaptic weights, length of ascending and descending axons, and firing behaviour. These models will serve as valuable tools to test and further understand the operation of spinal circuits for locomotion.

Data availability

The code for the models and for the figures, as well as the data used to make the figures, can be accessed at https://github.com/bui-lab/code. Updates and revisions to the models will also be made available at this site.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yann Roussel

    Blue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Stephanie F Gaudreau

    Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Emily R Kacer

    Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mohini Sengupta

    Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5234-8258
  5. Tuan V Bui

    Biology, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    For correspondence
    tuan.bui@uottawa.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0024-1544

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-06403)

  • Tuan V Bui

McDonnell Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology Postdoc Fellowship (FY21)

  • Mohini Sengupta

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC 712210101627)

  • Stephanie F Gaudreau

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Roussel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,179
    views
  • 298
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yann Roussel
  2. Stephanie F Gaudreau
  3. Emily R Kacer
  4. Mohini Sengupta
  5. Tuan V Bui
(2021)
Modelling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish
eLife 10:e67453.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67453

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67453

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Magdalena Solyga, Georg B Keller
    Research Article

    Our movements result in predictable sensory feedback that is often multimodal. Based on deviations between predictions and actual sensory input, primary sensory areas of cortex have been shown to compute sensorimotor prediction errors. How prediction errors in one sensory modality influence the computation of prediction errors in another modality is still unclear. To investigate multimodal prediction errors in mouse auditory cortex, we used a virtual environment to experimentally couple running to both self-generated auditory and visual feedback. Using two-photon microscopy, we first characterized responses of layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons to sounds, visual stimuli, and running onsets and found responses to all three stimuli. Probing responses evoked by audiomotor (AM) mismatches, we found that they closely resemble visuomotor (VM) mismatch responses in visual cortex (V1). Finally, testing for cross modal influence on AM mismatch responses by coupling both sound amplitude and visual flow speed to the speed of running, we found that AM mismatch responses were amplified when paired with concurrent VM mismatches. Our results demonstrate that multimodal and non-hierarchical interactions shape prediction error responses in cortical L2/3.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gyeong Hee Pyeon, Hyewon Cho ... Yong Sang Jo
    Research Article Updated

    Recent studies suggest that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) represent aversive information and signal a general alarm to the forebrain. If CGRP neurons serve as a true general alarm, their activation would modulate both passive nad active defensive behaviors depending on the magnitude and context of the threat. However, most prior research has focused on the role of CGRP neurons in passive freezing responses, with limited exploration of their involvement in active defensive behaviors. To address this, we examined the role of CGRP neurons in active defensive behavior using a predator-like robot programmed to chase mice. Our electrophysiological results revealed that CGRP neurons encode the intensity of aversive stimuli through variations in firing durations and amplitudes. Optogenetic activation of CGRP neurons during robot chasing elevated flight responses in both conditioning and retention tests, presumably by amplifying the perception of the threat as more imminent and dangerous. In contrast, animals with inactivated CGRP neurons exhibited reduced flight responses, even when the robot was programmed to appear highly threatening during conditioning. These findings expand the understanding of CGRP neurons in the PBN as a critical alarm system, capable of dynamically regulating active defensive behaviors by amplifying threat perception, and ensuring adaptive responses to varying levels of danger.