Modelling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish

  1. Yann Roussel
  2. Stephanie F Gaudreau
  3. Emily R Kacer
  4. Mohini Sengupta
  5. Tuan V Bui  Is a corresponding author
  1. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. University of Ottawa, Canada
  3. Washington University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Many spinal circuits dedicated to locomotor control have been identified in the developing zebrafish. How these circuits operate together to generate the various swimming movements during development remains to be clarified. In this study, we iteratively built models of developing zebrafish spinal circuits coupled to simplified musculoskeletal models that reproduce coiling and swimming movements. The neurons of the models were based upon morphologically or genetically identified populations in the developing zebrafish spinal cord. We simulated intact spinal circuits as well as circuits with silenced neurons or altered synaptic transmission to better understand the role of specific spinal neurons. Analysis of firing patterns and phase relationships helped identify possible mechanisms underlying the locomotor movements of developing zebrafish. Notably, our simulations demonstrated how the site and the operation of rhythm generation could transition between coiling and swimming. The simulations also underlined the importance of contralateral excitation to multiple tail beats. They allowed us to estimate the sensitivity of spinal locomotor networks to motor command amplitude, synaptic weights, length of ascending and descending axons, and firing behaviour. These models will serve as valuable tools to test and further understand the operation of spinal circuits for locomotion.

Data availability

The code for the models and for the figures, as well as the data used to make the figures, can be accessed at https://github.com/bui-lab/code. Updates and revisions to the models will also be made available at this site.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yann Roussel

    Blue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Stephanie F Gaudreau

    Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Emily R Kacer

    Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mohini Sengupta

    Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5234-8258
  5. Tuan V Bui

    Biology, Brain and Mind Research Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    For correspondence
    tuan.bui@uottawa.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0024-1544

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2015-06403)

  • Tuan V Bui

McDonnell Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology Postdoc Fellowship (FY21)

  • Mohini Sengupta

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC 712210101627)

  • Stephanie F Gaudreau

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Roussel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,055
    views
  • 285
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yann Roussel
  2. Stephanie F Gaudreau
  3. Emily R Kacer
  4. Mohini Sengupta
  5. Tuan V Bui
(2021)
Modelling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish
eLife 10:e67453.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67453

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67453

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Eun Joo Kim, Mi-Seon Kong ... Jeansok John Kim
    Research Article

    Pavlovian fear conditioning research suggests that the interaction between the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) acts as a prediction error mechanism in the formation of associative fear memories. However, their roles in responding to naturalistic predatory threats, characterized by less explicit cues and the absence of reiterative trial-and-error learning events, remain unexplored. In this study, we conducted single-unit recordings in rats during an ‘approach food-avoid predator’ task, focusing on the responsiveness of dPAG and BLA neurons to a rapidly approaching robot predator. Optogenetic stimulation of the dPAG triggered fleeing behaviors and increased BLA activity in naive rats. Notably, BLA neurons activated by dPAG stimulation displayed immediate responses to the robot, demonstrating heightened synchronous activity compared to BLA neurons that did not respond to dPAG stimulation. Additionally, the use of anterograde and retrograde tracer injections into the dPAG and BLA, respectively, coupled with c-Fos activation in response to predatory threats, indicates that the midline thalamus may play an intermediary role in innate antipredatory-defensive functioning.

    1. Neuroscience
    Yangang Li, Xinyun Zhu ... Yueming Wang
    Research Article

    In motor cortex, behaviorally relevant neural responses are entangled with irrelevant signals, which complicates the study of encoding and decoding mechanisms. It remains unclear whether behaviorally irrelevant signals could conceal some critical truth. One solution is to accurately separate behaviorally relevant and irrelevant signals at both single-neuron and single-trial levels, but this approach remains elusive due to the unknown ground truth of behaviorally relevant signals. Therefore, we propose a framework to define, extract, and validate behaviorally relevant signals. Analyzing separated signals in three monkeys performing different reaching tasks, we found neural responses previously considered to contain little information actually encode rich behavioral information in complex nonlinear ways. These responses are critical for neuronal redundancy and reveal movement behaviors occupy a higher-dimensional neural space than previously expected. Surprisingly, when incorporating often-ignored neural dimensions, behaviorally relevant signals can be decoded linearly with comparable performance to nonlinear decoding, suggesting linear readout may be performed in motor cortex. Our findings prompt that separating behaviorally relevant signals may help uncover more hidden cortical mechanisms.