Spatially displaced excitation contributes to the encoding of interrupted motion by a retinal direction-selective circuit

  1. Jennifer Ding
  2. Albert Chen
  3. Janet Chung
  4. Hector Acaron Ledesma
  5. Mofei Wu
  6. David M Berson
  7. Stephanie E Palmer  Is a corresponding author
  8. Wei Wei  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Chicago, United States
  2. Harvard University, United States
  3. Brown University, United States

Abstract

Spatially distributed excitation and inhibition collectively shape a visual neuron's receptive field (RF) properties. In the direction-selective circuit of the mammalian retina, the role of strong null-direction inhibition of On-Off direction-selective ganglion cells (On-Off DSGCs) on their direction selectivity is well-studied. However, how excitatory inputs influence the On-Off DSGC's visual response is underexplored. Here, we report that On-Off DSGCs have a spatially displaced glutamatergic receptive field along their horizontal preferred-null motion axes. This displaced receptive field contributes to DSGC null-direction spiking during interrupted motion trajectories. Theoretical analyses indicate that population responses during interrupted motion may help populations of On-Off DSGCs signal the spatial location of moving objects in complex, naturalistic visual environments. Our study highlights that the direction-selective circuit exploits separate sets of mechanisms under different stimulus conditions, and these mechanisms may help encode multiple visual features.

Data availability

Data available on Dryad Digital Repository (doi:10.5061/dryad.vq83bk3s8). Source data files have been provided for all main text and supplemental figures.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jennifer Ding

    Committee on Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2282-6615
  2. Albert Chen

    Biophysics Graduate Program, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9306-8703
  3. Janet Chung

    Department of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Hector Acaron Ledesma

    Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Mofei Wu

    Department of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. David M Berson

    Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Stephanie E Palmer

    Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    sepalmer@uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    Stephanie E Palmer, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6211-6293
  8. Wei Wei

    Department of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    weiw@uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7771-5974

Funding

NIH (R01 NS109990)

  • Wei Wei

McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience (McKnight Scholarship Award)

  • Wei Wei

NSF (GRFP DGE-1746045)

  • Jennifer Ding

NIH (F31 EY029156)

  • Hector Acaron Ledesma

NSF (Career Award 1652617)

  • Stephanie E Palmer

Physics of Biological Function (PHY-1734030)

  • Stephanie E Palmer

NIH (RO1 EY012793)

  • David M Berson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures regarding the use of mice were in accordance with the University of Chicago Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (ACUP protocol 72247) and with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Public Health Service Policy.

Copyright

© 2021, Ding et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,114
    views
  • 187
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jennifer Ding
  2. Albert Chen
  3. Janet Chung
  4. Hector Acaron Ledesma
  5. Mofei Wu
  6. David M Berson
  7. Stephanie E Palmer
  8. Wei Wei
(2021)
Spatially displaced excitation contributes to the encoding of interrupted motion by a retinal direction-selective circuit
eLife 10:e68181.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68181

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68181

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kathleen T Quach, Gillian A Hughes, Sreekanth H Chalasani
    Research Article

    Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.

    1. Neuroscience
    Markus R Tünte, Stefanie Hoehl ... Ezgi Kayhan
    Research Advance

    Several recent theoretical accounts have posited that interoception, the perception of internal bodily signals, plays a vital role in early human development. Yet, empirical evidence of cardiac interoceptive sensitivity in infants to date has been mixed. Furthermore, existing evidence does not go beyond the perception of cardiac signals and focuses only on the age of 5–7 mo, limiting the generalizability of the results. Here, we used a modified version of the cardiac interoceptive sensitivity paradigm introduced by Maister et al., 2017 in 3-, 9-, and 18-mo-old infants using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Going beyond, we introduce a novel experimental paradigm, namely the iBREATH, to investigate respiratory interoceptive sensitivity in infants. Overall, for cardiac interoceptive sensitivity (total n=135) we find rather stable evidence across ages with infants on average preferring stimuli presented synchronously to their heartbeat. For respiratory interoceptive sensitivity (total n=120) our results show a similar pattern in the first year of life, but not at 18 mo. We did not observe a strong relationship between cardiac and respiratory interoceptive sensitivity at 3 and 9 mo but found some evidence for a relationship at 18 mo. We validated our results using specification curve- and mega-analytic approaches. By examining early cardiac and respiratory interoceptive processing, we provide evidence that infants are sensitive to their interoceptive signals.