Defining function of wild-type and three patient specific TP53 mutations in a zebrafish model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma

Abstract

In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) and generally in sarcomas, the role of wild-type and loss or gain-of-function TP53 mutations remains largely undefined. Eliminating mutant or restoring wild-type p53 is challenging; nevertheless, understanding p53 variant effects on tumorigenesis remains central to realizing better treatment outcomes. In ERMS, >70% of patients retain wild-type TP53, yet mutations when present are associated with worse prognosis. Employing a kRASG12D-driven ERMS tumor model and tp53 null (tp53-/-) zebrafish, we define wild-type and patient-specific TP53 mutant effects on tumorigenesis. We demonstrate that tp53 is a major suppressor of tumorigenesis, where tp53 loss expands tumor initiation from <35% to >97% of animals. Characterizing three patient-specific alleles reveals that TP53C176F partially retains wild-type p53 apoptotic activity that can be exploited, whereas TP53P153D and TP53Y220C encode two structurally related proteins with gain-of-function effects that predispose to head musculature ERMS. TP53P153D unexpectedly also predisposes to hedgehog expressing medulloblastomas in the kRASG12D-driven ERMS-model.

Data availability

Data sets were submitted to DRYAD, available here: doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zgmsbccb6

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jiangfei Chen

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kunal Baxi

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Amanda E Lipsitt

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3757-8493
  4. Nicole Rae Hensch

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9946-0995
  5. Long Wang

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7935-4148
  6. Prethish Sreenivas

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paulomi Modi

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiang Ru Zhao

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Antoine Baudin

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniel G Robledo

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Abhik Bandyopadhyay

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Aaron Sugalski

    Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Anil K Challa

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Dias Kurmashev

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Andrea R Gilbert

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gail E Tomlinson

    Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Peter Houghton

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Yidong Chen

    Department of Population Health Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Madeline N Hayes

    Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Eleanor Y Chen

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. David S Libich

    Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6492-2803
  22. Myron S Ignatius

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    For correspondence
    ignatius@uthscsa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6639-7707

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Training Award,RP 170345)

  • Amanda E Lipsitt

St. Baldrick's Foundation

  • David S Libich

Welch Foundation

  • David S Libich

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Greehey Graduate Fellowship in Children's Health)

  • Paulomi Modi

Hyundai Hope On Wheels (Young Investigator Grant)

  • Amanda E Lipsitt

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund (Young Investigator Award)

  • Myron S Ignatius

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund (Young Investigator Award)

  • David S Libich

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Cancer T32 Fellow,T32CA148724)

  • Kunal Baxi

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Translational Science TL1 Fellow,TL1TR002647)

  • Kunal Baxi

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Scholar Grant,RR160062)

  • Myron S Ignatius

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Greehey Graduate Fellowship in Children's Health)

  • Nicole Rae Hensch

National Institutes of Health (R00CA1715184)

  • Peter Houghton
  • Myron S Ignatius

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen C Ekker, Mayo Clinic, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal studies were approved by the UT Health San Antonio Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol #20150015AR (mice) and #20170101AR (zebrafish). Zebrafish images were taken with specimens under tricaine anesthesia. Zebrafish tumor extraction was performed by administering high dose tricaine to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: Patient presenting with osteosarcoma signed a Consent to be part of a Repository, Epidemiology of Cancer in Children, Adolescents and Adults. In brief, this allowed for the storage of tissue, cataloging of medical information, and for research to be conducted from collected samples. The study's IRB number is HSC20080057H. Patient was informed of the risks and benefits. The umbrella study covering epidemiological study and patient-derived xenograft generation is IRB approved through UT Health San Antonio.

Version history

  1. Received: March 9, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: April 22, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: June 1, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: July 5, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,077
    views
  • 158
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jiangfei Chen
  2. Kunal Baxi
  3. Amanda E Lipsitt
  4. Nicole Rae Hensch
  5. Long Wang
  6. Prethish Sreenivas
  7. Paulomi Modi
  8. Xiang Ru Zhao
  9. Antoine Baudin
  10. Daniel G Robledo
  11. Abhik Bandyopadhyay
  12. Aaron Sugalski
  13. Anil K Challa
  14. Dias Kurmashev
  15. Andrea R Gilbert
  16. Gail E Tomlinson
  17. Peter Houghton
  18. Yidong Chen
  19. Madeline N Hayes
  20. Eleanor Y Chen
  21. David S Libich
  22. Myron S Ignatius
(2023)
Defining function of wild-type and three patient specific TP53 mutations in a zebrafish model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
eLife 12:e68221.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68221

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68221

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Pirunthan Perampalam, James I MacDonald ... Frederick A Dick
    Research Article

    Dormancy in cancer is a clinical state in which residual disease remains undetectable for a prolonged duration. At a cellular level, rare cancer cells cease proliferation and survive chemotherapy and disseminate disease. We created a suspension culture model of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) dormancy and devised a novel CRISPR screening approach to identify survival genes in this context. In combination with RNA-seq, we discovered the Netrin signaling pathway as critical to dormant HGSOC cell survival. We demonstrate that Netrin-1, –3, and its receptors are essential for low level ERK activation to promote survival, and that Netrin activation of ERK is unable to induce proliferation. Deletion of all UNC5 family receptors blocks Netrin signaling in HGSOC cells and compromises viability during the dormancy step of dissemination in xenograft assays. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Netrin-1 and –3 overexpression in HGSOC correlates with poor outcome. Specifically, our experiments reveal that Netrin overexpression elevates cell survival in dormant culture conditions and contributes to greater spread of disease in a xenograft model of abdominal dissemination. This study highlights Netrin signaling as a key mediator HGSOC cancer cell dormancy and metastasis.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.