Defining function of wild-type and three patient specific TP53 mutations in a zebrafish model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma

Abstract

In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) and generally in sarcomas, the role of wild-type and loss or gain-of-function TP53 mutations remains largely undefined. Eliminating mutant or restoring wild-type p53 is challenging; nevertheless, understanding p53 variant effects on tumorigenesis remains central to realizing better treatment outcomes. In ERMS, >70% of patients retain wild-type TP53, yet mutations when present are associated with worse prognosis. Employing a kRASG12D-driven ERMS tumor model and tp53 null (tp53-/-) zebrafish, we define wild-type and patient-specific TP53 mutant effects on tumorigenesis. We demonstrate that tp53 is a major suppressor of tumorigenesis, where tp53 loss expands tumor initiation from <35% to >97% of animals. Characterizing three patient-specific alleles reveals that TP53C176F partially retains wild-type p53 apoptotic activity that can be exploited, whereas TP53P153D and TP53Y220C encode two structurally related proteins with gain-of-function effects that predispose to head musculature ERMS. TP53P153D unexpectedly also predisposes to hedgehog expressing medulloblastomas in the kRASG12D-driven ERMS-model.

Data availability

Data sets were submitted to DRYAD, available here: doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zgmsbccb6

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jiangfei Chen

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kunal Baxi

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Amanda E Lipsitt

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3757-8493
  4. Nicole Rae Hensch

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9946-0995
  5. Long Wang

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7935-4148
  6. Prethish Sreenivas

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paulomi Modi

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiang Ru Zhao

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Antoine Baudin

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniel G Robledo

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Abhik Bandyopadhyay

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Aaron Sugalski

    Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Anil K Challa

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Dias Kurmashev

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Andrea R Gilbert

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gail E Tomlinson

    Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Peter Houghton

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Yidong Chen

    Department of Population Health Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Madeline N Hayes

    Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Eleanor Y Chen

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. David S Libich

    Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6492-2803
  22. Myron S Ignatius

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    For correspondence
    ignatius@uthscsa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6639-7707

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Training Award,RP 170345)

  • Amanda E Lipsitt

St. Baldrick's Foundation

  • David S Libich

Welch Foundation

  • David S Libich

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Greehey Graduate Fellowship in Children's Health)

  • Paulomi Modi

Hyundai Hope On Wheels (Young Investigator Grant)

  • Amanda E Lipsitt

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund (Young Investigator Award)

  • Myron S Ignatius

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund (Young Investigator Award)

  • David S Libich

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Cancer T32 Fellow,T32CA148724)

  • Kunal Baxi

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Translational Science TL1 Fellow,TL1TR002647)

  • Kunal Baxi

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Scholar Grant,RR160062)

  • Myron S Ignatius

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Greehey Graduate Fellowship in Children's Health)

  • Nicole Rae Hensch

National Institutes of Health (R00CA1715184)

  • Peter Houghton
  • Myron S Ignatius

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal studies were approved by the UT Health San Antonio Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol #20150015AR (mice) and #20170101AR (zebrafish). Zebrafish images were taken with specimens under tricaine anesthesia. Zebrafish tumor extraction was performed by administering high dose tricaine to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: Patient presenting with osteosarcoma signed a Consent to be part of a Repository, Epidemiology of Cancer in Children, Adolescents and Adults. In brief, this allowed for the storage of tissue, cataloging of medical information, and for research to be conducted from collected samples. The study's IRB number is HSC20080057H. Patient was informed of the risks and benefits. The umbrella study covering epidemiological study and patient-derived xenograft generation is IRB approved through UT Health San Antonio.

Copyright

© 2023, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,229
    views
  • 172
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jiangfei Chen
  2. Kunal Baxi
  3. Amanda E Lipsitt
  4. Nicole Rae Hensch
  5. Long Wang
  6. Prethish Sreenivas
  7. Paulomi Modi
  8. Xiang Ru Zhao
  9. Antoine Baudin
  10. Daniel G Robledo
  11. Abhik Bandyopadhyay
  12. Aaron Sugalski
  13. Anil K Challa
  14. Dias Kurmashev
  15. Andrea R Gilbert
  16. Gail E Tomlinson
  17. Peter Houghton
  18. Yidong Chen
  19. Madeline N Hayes
  20. Eleanor Y Chen
  21. David S Libich
  22. Myron S Ignatius
(2023)
Defining function of wild-type and three patient specific TP53 mutations in a zebrafish model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
eLife 12:e68221.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68221

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68221

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Simei Go, Constantinos Demetriou ... Eric O Neill
    Research Article

    The immunosuppressive microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prevents tumor control and strategies to restore anti-cancer immunity (i.e. by increasing CD8 T-cell activity) have had limited success. Here, we demonstrate how inducing localized physical damage using ionizing radiation (IR) unmasks the benefit of immunotherapy by increasing tissue-resident natural killer (trNK) cells that support CD8 T activity. Our data confirms that targeting mouse orthotopic PDAC tumors with IR together with CCR5 inhibition and PD1 blockade reduces E-cadherin positive tumor cells by recruiting a hypoactive NKG2D-ve NK population, phenotypically reminiscent of trNK cells, that supports CD8 T-cell involvement. We show an equivalent population in human single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) PDAC cohorts that represents immunomodulatory trNK cells that could similarly support CD8 T-cell levels in a cDC1-dependent manner. Importantly, a trNK signature associates with survival in PDAC and other solid malignancies revealing a potential beneficial role for trNK in improving adaptive anti-tumor responses and supporting CCR5 inhibitor (CCR5i)/αPD1 and IR-induced damage as a novel therapeutic approach.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Hyungtai Sim, Hyun Jung Park ... Murim Choi
    Research Article

    Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) allows estimation of clonal dynamics and documentation of somatic mutations in the hematopoietic system. Recent studies utilizing large cohorts of the general population and patients have revealed significant associations of CHIP burden with age and disease status, including in cancer and chronic diseases. An increasing number of cancer patients are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the association of ICI response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with CHIP burden remains to be determined. We collected blood samples from 100 metastatic NSCLC patients before and after ICI for high-depth sequencing of the CHIP panel and 63 samples for blood single-cell RNA sequencing. Whole exome sequencing was performed in an independent replication cohort of 180 patients. The impact of CHIP status on the immunotherapy response was not significant. However, metastatic lung cancer patients showed higher CHIP prevalence (44/100 for patients vs. 5/42 for controls; p = 0.01). In addition, lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) patients showed increased burden of larger clones compared to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients (8/43 for LUSC vs. 2/50 for LUAD; p = 0.04). Furthermore, single-cell RNA-seq analysis of the matched patients showed significant enrichment of inflammatory pathways mediated by NF-κB in myeloid clusters of the severe CHIP group. Our findings suggest minimal involvement of CHIP mutation and clonal dynamics during immunotherapy but a possible role of CHIP as an indicator of immunologic response in NSCLC patients.