Defining function of wild-type and three patient specific TP53 mutations in a zebrafish model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma

Abstract

In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) and generally in sarcomas, the role of wild-type and loss or gain-of-function TP53 mutations remains largely undefined. Eliminating mutant or restoring wild-type p53 is challenging; nevertheless, understanding p53 variant effects on tumorigenesis remains central to realizing better treatment outcomes. In ERMS, >70% of patients retain wild-type TP53, yet mutations when present are associated with worse prognosis. Employing a kRASG12D-driven ERMS tumor model and tp53 null (tp53-/-) zebrafish, we define wild-type and patient-specific TP53 mutant effects on tumorigenesis. We demonstrate that tp53 is a major suppressor of tumorigenesis, where tp53 loss expands tumor initiation from <35% to >97% of animals. Characterizing three patient-specific alleles reveals that TP53C176F partially retains wild-type p53 apoptotic activity that can be exploited, whereas TP53P153D and TP53Y220C encode two structurally related proteins with gain-of-function effects that predispose to head musculature ERMS. TP53P153D unexpectedly also predisposes to hedgehog expressing medulloblastomas in the kRASG12D-driven ERMS-model.

Data availability

Data sets were submitted to DRYAD, available here: doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zgmsbccb6

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jiangfei Chen

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Kunal Baxi

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Amanda E Lipsitt

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3757-8493
  4. Nicole Rae Hensch

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9946-0995
  5. Long Wang

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7935-4148
  6. Prethish Sreenivas

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paulomi Modi

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiang Ru Zhao

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Antoine Baudin

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniel G Robledo

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Abhik Bandyopadhyay

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Aaron Sugalski

    Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Anil K Challa

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Dias Kurmashev

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Andrea R Gilbert

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gail E Tomlinson

    Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Peter Houghton

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Yidong Chen

    Department of Population Health Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Madeline N Hayes

    Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Eleanor Y Chen

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. David S Libich

    Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6492-2803
  22. Myron S Ignatius

    Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
    For correspondence
    ignatius@uthscsa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6639-7707

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Training Award,RP 170345)

  • Amanda E Lipsitt

St. Baldrick's Foundation

  • David S Libich

Welch Foundation

  • David S Libich

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Greehey Graduate Fellowship in Children's Health)

  • Paulomi Modi

Hyundai Hope On Wheels (Young Investigator Grant)

  • Amanda E Lipsitt

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund (Young Investigator Award)

  • Myron S Ignatius

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund (Young Investigator Award)

  • David S Libich

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Cancer T32 Fellow,T32CA148724)

  • Kunal Baxi

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Translational Science TL1 Fellow,TL1TR002647)

  • Kunal Baxi

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Scholar Grant,RR160062)

  • Myron S Ignatius

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Greehey Graduate Fellowship in Children's Health)

  • Nicole Rae Hensch

National Institutes of Health (R00CA1715184)

  • Peter Houghton
  • Myron S Ignatius

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal studies were approved by the UT Health San Antonio Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under protocol #20150015AR (mice) and #20170101AR (zebrafish). Zebrafish images were taken with specimens under tricaine anesthesia. Zebrafish tumor extraction was performed by administering high dose tricaine to minimize suffering.

Human subjects: Patient presenting with osteosarcoma signed a Consent to be part of a Repository, Epidemiology of Cancer in Children, Adolescents and Adults. In brief, this allowed for the storage of tissue, cataloging of medical information, and for research to be conducted from collected samples. The study's IRB number is HSC20080057H. Patient was informed of the risks and benefits. The umbrella study covering epidemiological study and patient-derived xenograft generation is IRB approved through UT Health San Antonio.

Copyright

© 2023, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,358
    views
  • 180
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jiangfei Chen
  2. Kunal Baxi
  3. Amanda E Lipsitt
  4. Nicole Rae Hensch
  5. Long Wang
  6. Prethish Sreenivas
  7. Paulomi Modi
  8. Xiang Ru Zhao
  9. Antoine Baudin
  10. Daniel G Robledo
  11. Abhik Bandyopadhyay
  12. Aaron Sugalski
  13. Anil K Challa
  14. Dias Kurmashev
  15. Andrea R Gilbert
  16. Gail E Tomlinson
  17. Peter Houghton
  18. Yidong Chen
  19. Madeline N Hayes
  20. Eleanor Y Chen
  21. David S Libich
  22. Myron S Ignatius
(2023)
Defining function of wild-type and three patient specific TP53 mutations in a zebrafish model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma
eLife 12:e68221.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68221

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68221

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Qianqian Ju, Wenjing Sheng ... Cheng Sun
    Research Article

    TAK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is a key regulator in a wide variety of cellular processes. However, the functions and mechanisms involved in cancer metastasis are still not well understood. Here, we found that TAK1 knockdown promoted esophageal squamous cancer carcinoma (ESCC) migration and invasion, whereas TAK1 overexpression resulted in the opposite outcome. These in vitro findings were recapitulated in vivo in a xenograft metastatic mouse model. Mechanistically, co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry demonstrated that TAK1 interacted with phospholipase C epsilon 1 (PLCE1) and phosphorylated PLCE1 at serine 1060 (S1060). Functional studies revealed that phosphorylation at S1060 in PLCE1 resulted in decreased enzyme activity, leading to the repression of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis. As a result, the degradation products of PIP2 including diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol IP3 were reduced, which thereby suppressed signal transduction in the axis of PKC/GSK-3β/β-Catenin. Consequently, expression of cancer metastasis-related genes was impeded by TAK1. Overall, our data indicate that TAK1 plays a negative role in ESCC metastasis, which depends on the TAK1-induced phosphorylation of PLCE1 at S1060.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Rui Hua, Jean X Jiang
    Insight

    Cell crowding causes high-grade breast cancer cells to become more invasive by activating a molecular switch that causes the cells to shrink and spread.