GABAB receptor auxiliary subunits modulate Cav2.3-mediated release from medial habenula terminals

Abstract

The synaptic connection from medial habenula (MHb) to interpeduncular nucleus (IPN) is critical for emotion-related behaviors, and uniquely expresses R-type Ca2+ channels (Cav2.3) and auxiliary GABAB receptor (GBR) subunits, the K+-channel tetramerization domain-containing proteins (KCTDs). Activation of GBRs facilitates or inhibits transmitter release from MHb terminals depending on the IPN subnucleus, but the role of KCTDs is unknown. We therefore examined the localization and function of Cav2.3, GBRs, and KCTDs in this pathway in mice. We show in heterologous cells that KCTD8 and KCTD12b directly bind to Cav2.3 and that KCTD8 potentiates Cav2.3 currents in the absence of GBRs. In the rostral IPN, KCTD8, KCTD12b and Cav2.3 co-localize at the presynaptic active zone. Genetic deletion indicated a bidirectional modulation of Cav2.3-mediated release by these KCTDs with a compensatory increase of KCTD8 in the active zone in KCTD12b-deficient mice. The interaction of Cav2.3 with KCTDs therefore scales synaptic strength independent of GBR activation.

Data availability

For all figures, numerical data that are represented in graphs are provided as source data excel files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pradeep Bhandari

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David Vandael

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Diego Fernández-Fernández

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1431-3705
  4. Thorsten Fritzius

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David Kleindienst

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Cihan Önal

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2771-2011
  7. Jacqueline Montanaro

    IST Austria, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg,, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Martin Gassmann

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Peter Jonas

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5001-4804
  10. Akos Kulik

    Institute of Physiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Bernhard Bettler

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Ryuichi Shigemoto

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    For correspondence
    ryuichi.shigemoto@ist.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8761-9444
  13. Peter Koppensteiner

    Neuroscience, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    For correspondence
    peter.koppensteiner@ist.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3509-1948

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (694539)

  • Ryuichi Shigemoto

H2020 European Research Council (692692)

  • Peter Jonas

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A‐172881)

  • Bernhard Bettler

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (665385)

  • Cihan Önal

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (For2143)

  • Akos Kulik

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BIOSS-2)

  • Akos Kulik

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in accordance with the license approved by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research (Animal license number: BMWFW-66.018/0012-WF/V/3b/2016) and the Austrian and EU animal laws.

Copyright

© 2021, Bhandari et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,630
    views
  • 291
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pradeep Bhandari
  2. David Vandael
  3. Diego Fernández-Fernández
  4. Thorsten Fritzius
  5. David Kleindienst
  6. Cihan Önal
  7. Jacqueline Montanaro
  8. Martin Gassmann
  9. Peter Jonas
  10. Akos Kulik
  11. Bernhard Bettler
  12. Ryuichi Shigemoto
  13. Peter Koppensteiner
(2021)
GABAB receptor auxiliary subunits modulate Cav2.3-mediated release from medial habenula terminals
eLife 10:e68274.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68274

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68274

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Magdalena Ziółkowska, Narges Sotoudeh ... Kasia Radwanska
    Research Article

    The ability to extinguish contextual fear in a changing environment is crucial for animal survival. Recent data support the role of the thalamic nucleus reuniens (RE) and its projections to the dorsal hippocampal CA1 area (RE→dCA1) in this process. However, it remains poorly understood how RE impacts dCA1 neurons during contextual fear extinction (CFE). Here, we reveal that the RE→dCA1 pathway contributes to the extinction of contextual fear by affecting CFE-induced molecular remodeling of excitatory synapses. Anatomical tracing and chemogenetic manipulation in mice demonstrate that RE neurons form synapses and regulate synaptic transmission in the stratum oriens (SO) and lacunosum-moleculare (SLM) of the dCA1 area, but not in the stratum radiatum (SR). We also observe CFE-specific structural changes of excitatory synapses and expression of the synaptic scaffold protein, PSD-95, in both strata innervated by RE, but not in SR. Interestingly, only the changes in SLM are specific for the dendrites innervated by RE. To further support the role of the RE→dCA1 projection in CFE, we demonstrate that brief chemogenetic inhibition of the RE→dCA1 pathway during a CFE session persistently impairs the formation of CFE memory and CFE-induced changes of PSD-95 levels in SLM. Thus, our data indicate that RE participates in CFE by regulating CFE-induced molecular remodeling of dCA1 synapses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Scott Isherwood, Sarah A Kemp ... Birte Forstmann
    Research Article

    This study investigates the functional network underlying response inhibition in the human brain, particularly the role of the basal ganglia in successful action cancellation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approaches have frequently used the stop-signal task to examine this network. We merge five such datasets, using a novel aggregatory method allowing the unification of raw fMRI data across sites. This meta-analysis, along with other recent aggregatory fMRI studies, does not find evidence for the innervation of the hyperdirect or indirect cortico-basal-ganglia pathways in successful response inhibition. What we do find, is large subcortical activity profiles for failed stop trials. We discuss possible explanations for the mismatch of findings between the fMRI results presented here and results from other research modalities that have implicated nodes of the basal ganglia in successful inhibition. We also highlight the substantial effect smoothing can have on the conclusions drawn from task-specific general linear models. First and foremost, this study presents a proof of concept for meta-analytical methods that enable the merging of extensive, unprocessed, or unreduced datasets. It demonstrates the significant potential that open-access data sharing can offer to the research community. With an increasing number of datasets being shared publicly, researchers will have the ability to conduct meta-analyses on more than just summary data.