1. Neuroscience

A bidirectional corticoamygdala circuit for the encoding and retrieval of detailed reward memories

  1. Ana C Sias
  2. Ashleigh K Morse
  3. Sherry Wang
  4. Venuz Y Greenfield
  5. Caitlin M Goodpaster
  6. Tyler M Wrenn
  7. Andrew Wikenheiser
  8. Sandra M Holley
  9. Carlos Cepeda
  10. Michael S Levine
  11. Kate M Wassum  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  2. Matilda Centre, University of Sydney, Australia
  3. UCLA, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68617
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Ana C Sias
  2. Ashleigh K Morse
  3. Sherry Wang
  4. Venuz Y Greenfield
  5. Caitlin M Goodpaster
  6. Tyler M Wrenn
  7. Andrew Wikenheiser
  8. Sandra M Holley
  9. Carlos Cepeda
  10. Michael S Levine
  11. Kate M Wassum
(2021)
A bidirectional corticoamygdala circuit for the encoding and retrieval of detailed reward memories
eLife 10:e68617.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68617
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Adaptive reward-related decision making often requires accurate and detailed representation of potential available rewards. Environmental reward-predictive stimuli can facilitate these representations, allowing one to infer which specific rewards might be available and choose accordingly. This process relies on encoded relationships between the cues and the sensory-specific details of the reward they predict. Here we interrogated the function of the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and its interaction with the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) in the ability to learn such stimulus-outcome associations and use these memories to guide decision making. Using optical recording and inhibition approaches, Pavlovian cue-reward conditioning, and the outcome-selective Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) test in male rats, we found that the BLA is robustly activated at the time of stimulus-outcome learning and that this activity is necessary for sensory-specific stimulus-outcome memories to be encoded, so they can subsequently influence reward choices. Direct input from the lOFC was found to support the BLA in this function. Based on prior work, activity in BLA projections back to the lOFC was known to support the use of stimulus-outcome memories to influence decision making. By multiplexing optogenetic and chemogenetic inhibition we performed a serial circuit disconnection and found that the lOFCàBLA and BLAàlOFC pathways form a functional circuit regulating the encoding (lOFCàBLA) and subsequent use (BLAàlOFC) of the stimulus-dependent, sensory-specific reward memories that are critical for adaptive, appetitive decision making.

Data availability

All data and code support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request and via Dryad (doi:10.5068/D1109S).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ana C Sias

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  2. Ashleigh K Morse

    Faculty of Medicine and Health, Matilda Centre, University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0773-5790

  3. Sherry Wang

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Venuz Y Greenfield

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Caitlin M Goodpaster

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2456-9010

  6. Tyler M Wrenn

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Andrew Wikenheiser

    UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  8. Sandra M Holley

    Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, Brain Research Institute, Semel Institute for Neuroscience, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  9. Carlos Cepeda

    UCLA, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  10. Michael S Levine

    Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, Brain Research Institute, Semel Institute for Neuroscience, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  11. Kate M Wassum

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    kwassum@ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    Kate M Wassum, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2635-7433

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DA035443)

  • Kate M Wassum

National Science Foundation

  • Ana C Sias

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the UCLA Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Copyright

© 2021, Sias et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,678
    views
  • 540
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ana C Sias
  2. Ashleigh K Morse
  3. Sherry Wang
  4. Venuz Y Greenfield
  5. Caitlin M Goodpaster
  6. Tyler M Wrenn
  7. Andrew Wikenheiser
  8. Sandra M Holley
  9. Carlos Cepeda
  10. Michael S Levine
  11. Kate M Wassum
(2021)
A bidirectional corticoamygdala circuit for the encoding and retrieval of detailed reward memories
eLife 10:e68617.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68617

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68617

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Translatome analysis reveals cellular network in DLK-dependent hippocampal glutamatergic neuron degeneration

    Erin M Ritchie, Dilan Acar ... Yishi Jin
    Research Article

    The conserved MAP3K12/Dual Leucine Zipper Kinase (DLK) plays versatile roles in neuronal development, axon injury and stress responses, and neurodegeneration, depending on cell-type and cellular contexts. Emerging evidence implicates abnormal DLK signaling in several neurodegenerative diseases. However, our understanding of the DLK-dependent gene network in the central nervous system remains limited. Here, we investigated the roles of DLK in hippocampal glutamatergic neurons using conditional knockout and induced overexpression mice. We found that dorsal CA1 and dentate gyrus neurons are vulnerable to elevated expression of DLK, while CA3 neurons appear less vulnerable. We identified the DLK-dependent translatome that includes conserved molecular signatures and displays cell-type specificity. Increasing DLK signaling is associated with disruptions to microtubules, potentially involving STMN4. Additionally, primary cultured hippocampal neurons expressing different levels of DLK show altered neurite outgrowth, axon specification, and synapse formation. The identification of translational targets of DLK in hippocampal glutamatergic neurons has relevance to our understanding of selective neuron vulnerability under stress and pathological conditions.

    1. Neuroscience

    Aminergic and peptidergic modulation of insulin-producing cells in Drosophila

    Martina Held, Rituja S Bisen ... Jan M Ache
    Research Article

    Insulin plays a critical role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis. Since metabolic demands are highly dynamic, insulin release needs to be constantly adjusted. These adjustments are mediated by different pathways, most prominently the blood glucose level, but also by feedforward signals from motor circuits and different neuromodulatory systems. Here, we analyze how neuromodulatory inputs control the activity of the main source of insulin in Drosophila – a population of insulin-producing cells (IPCs) located in the brain. IPCs are functionally analogous to mammalian pancreatic beta cells, but their location makes them accessible for in vivo recordings in intact animals. We characterized functional inputs to IPCs using single-nucleus RNA sequencing analysis, anatomical receptor expression mapping, connectomics, and an optogenetics-based ‘intrinsic pharmacology’ approach. Our results show that the IPC population expresses a variety of receptors for neuromodulators and classical neurotransmitters. Interestingly, IPCs exhibit heterogeneous receptor profiles, suggesting that the IPC population can be modulated differentially. This is supported by electrophysiological recordings from IPCs, which we performed while activating different populations of modulatory neurons. Our analysis revealed that some modulatory inputs have heterogeneous effects on the IPC activity, such that they inhibit one subset of IPCs, while exciting another. Monitoring calcium activity across the IPC population uncovered that these heterogeneous responses occur simultaneously. Certain neuromodulatory populations shifted the IPC population activity towards an excited state, while others shifted it towards inhibition. Taken together, we provide a comprehensive, multi-level analysis of neuromodulation in the insulinergic system of Drosophila.

    1. Neuroscience

    Dopamine increases protein synthesis in hippocampal neurons enabling dopamine-dependent LTP

    Tanja Fuchsberger, Imogen Stockwell ... Ole Paulsen
    Research Advance

    The reward and novelty-related neuromodulator dopamine plays an important role in hippocampal long-term memory, which is thought to involve protein-synthesis-dependent synaptic plasticity. However, the direct effects of dopamine on protein synthesis, and the functional implications of newly synthesised proteins for synaptic plasticity, have not yet been investigated. We have previously reported that timing-dependent synaptic depression (t-LTD) can be converted into potentiation by dopamine application during synaptic stimulation (Brzosko et al., 2015) or postsynaptic burst activation (Fuchsberger et al., 2022). Here, we show that dopamine increases protein synthesis in mouse hippocampal CA1 neurons, enabling dopamine-dependent long-term potentiation (DA-LTP), which is mediated via the Ca2+-sensitive adenylate cyclase (AC) subtypes 1/8, cAMP, and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). We found that neuronal activity is required for the dopamine-induced increase in protein synthesis. Furthermore, dopamine induced a protein-synthesis-dependent increase in the AMPA receptor subunit GluA1, but not GluA2. We found that DA-LTP is absent in GluA1 knock-out mice and that it requires calcium-permeable AMPA receptors. Taken together, our results suggest that dopamine together with neuronal activity controls synthesis of plasticity-related proteins, including GluA1, which enable DA-LTP via a signalling pathway distinct from that of conventional LTP.