Protein allocation and utilization in the versatile chemolithoautotroph Cupriavidus necator

  1. Michael Jahn  Is a corresponding author
  2. Nick Crang
  3. Markus Janasch
  4. Andreas Hober
  5. Björn Forsström
  6. Kyle Kimler
  7. Alexander Mattausch
  8. Qi Chen
  9. Johannes Asplund-Samuelsson
  10. Elton Paul Hudson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
  2. The Broad Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, United States
  3. Heidelberg University, Germany

Abstract

Bacteria must balance the different needs for substrate assimilation, growth functions, and resilience in order to thrive in their environment. Of all cellular macromolecules, the bacterial proteome is by far the most important resource and its size is limited. Here, we investigated how the highly versatile 'knallgas' bacterium Cupriavidus necator reallocates protein resources when grown on different limiting substrates and with different growth rates. We determined protein quantity by mass spectrometry and estimated enzyme utilization by resource balance analysis modeling. We found that C. necator invests a large fraction of its proteome in functions that are hardly utilized. Of the enzymes that are utilized, many are present in excess abundance. One prominent example is the strong expression of CBB cycle genes such as Rubisco during growth on fructose. Modeling and mutant competition experiments suggest that CO2-reassimilation through Rubisco does not provide a fitness benefit for heterotrophic growth, but is rather an investment in readiness for autotrophy.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD024819. Protein quantification results can be browsed and interactively analyzed using the web application available at https://m-jahn.shinyapps.io/ShinyProt.Sequencing data for TnSeq and BarSeq experiments are available at the European Nucleotide Archive with accession number PRJEB43757. The data for competition experiments performed with the transposon mutant library can be browsed and interactively analyzed using the web application available at https://m-jahn.shinyapps.io/ShinyLib/.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael Jahn

    Nanobiotechnology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    michael.jahn@scilifelab.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3913-153X
  2. Nick Crang

    Nanobiotechnology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7569-6597
  3. Markus Janasch

    Protein Science/Systems Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7745-720X
  4. Andreas Hober

    Protein Science, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8947-2562
  5. Björn Forsström

    Systems Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5248-8568
  6. Kyle Kimler

    The Broad Institute and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Alexander Mattausch

    Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Qi Chen

    Systems Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Johannes Asplund-Samuelsson

    School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8077-5305
  10. Elton Paul Hudson

    Protein Science, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
    For correspondence
    paul.hudson@scilifelab.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1899-7649

Funding

Swedish Research Council Vetenskapsrådet (2016-06160)

  • Nick Crang
  • Kyle Kimler
  • Johannes Asplund-Samuelsson

Swedish Research Council Formas (2019-01491)

  • Michael Jahn

Swedish Research Council Formas (2015-939)

  • Michael Jahn

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20OC0061469)

  • Markus Janasch
  • Elton Paul Hudson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Jahn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,250
    views
  • 520
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael Jahn
  2. Nick Crang
  3. Markus Janasch
  4. Andreas Hober
  5. Björn Forsström
  6. Kyle Kimler
  7. Alexander Mattausch
  8. Qi Chen
  9. Johannes Asplund-Samuelsson
  10. Elton Paul Hudson
(2021)
Protein allocation and utilization in the versatile chemolithoautotroph Cupriavidus necator
eLife 10:e69019.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69019

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69019

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Sabrina Benas, Ximena Fernandez, Emilio Kropff
    Research Article

    Entorhinal grid cells implement a spatial code with hexagonal periodicity, signaling the position of the animal within an environment. Grid maps of cells belonging to the same module share spacing and orientation, only differing in relative two-dimensional spatial phase, which could result from being part of a two-dimensional attractor guided by path integration. However, this architecture has the drawbacks of being complex to construct and rigid, path integration allowing for no deviations from the hexagonal pattern such as the ones observed under a variety of experimental manipulations. Here, we show that a simpler one-dimensional attractor is enough to align grid cells equally well. Using topological data analysis, we show that the resulting population activity is a sample of a torus, while the ensemble of maps preserves features of the network architecture. The flexibility of this low dimensional attractor allows it to negotiate the geometry of the representation manifold with the feedforward inputs, rather than imposing it. More generally, our results represent a proof of principle against the intuition that the architecture and the representation manifold of an attractor are topological objects of the same dimensionality, with implications to the study of attractor networks across the brain.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Divyoj Singh, Sriram Ramaswamy ... Mohd Suhail Rizvi
    Research Article Updated

    Planar cell polarity (PCP) – tissue-scale alignment of the direction of asymmetric localization of proteins at the cell-cell interface – is essential for embryonic development and physiological functions. Abnormalities in PCP can result in developmental imperfections, including neural tube closure defects and misaligned hair follicles. Decoding the mechanisms responsible for PCP establishment and maintenance remains a fundamental open question. While the roles of various molecules – broadly classified into ‘global’ and ‘local’ modules – have been well-studied, their necessity and sufficiency in explaining PCP and connecting their perturbations to experimentally observed patterns have not been examined. Here, we develop a minimal model that captures the proposed features of PCP establishment – a global tissue-level gradient and local asymmetric distribution of protein complexes. The proposed model suggests that while polarity can emerge without a gradient, the gradient not only acts as a global cue but also increases the robustness of PCP against stochastic perturbations. We also recapitulated and quantified the experimentally observed features of swirling patterns and domineering non-autonomy, using only three free model parameters - rate of protein binding to membrane, the concentration of PCP proteins, and the gradient steepness. We explain how self-stabilizing asymmetric protein localizations in the presence of tissue-level gradient can lead to robust PCP patterns and reveal minimal design principles for a polarized system.