Neural tube-associated boundary caps are a major source of mural cells in the skin

  1. Gaspard Gerschenfeld
  2. Fanny Coulpier
  3. Aurélie Gresset
  4. Pernelle Pulh
  5. Bastien Job
  6. Thomas Topilko
  7. Julie Siegenthaler, Ph.D.
  8. Maria Eleni Kastriti
  9. Isabelle Brunet
  10. Patrick Charnay
  11. Piotr Topilko  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, Université PSL, France
  2. Mondor Institute of Biomedical Research, France
  3. Institut Gustave Roussy, France
  4. Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, France
  5. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States
  6. Karolinska Institute, Sweden
  7. Collège de France, France

Abstract

In addition to their roles in protecting nerves and increasing conduction velocity, peripheral glia plays key functions in blood vessel development by secreting molecules governing arteries alignment and maturation with nerves. Here we show in mice that a specific, nerve-attached cell population, derived from boundary caps (BCs), constitutes a major source of mural cells for the developing skin vasculature. Using Cre-based reporter cell tracing and single-cell transcriptomics, we show that BC derivatives migrate into the skin along the nerves, detach from them and differentiate into pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. Genetic ablation of this population affects the organization of the skin vascular network. Our results reveal the heterogeneity and extended potential of the BC population in mice, which gives rise to mural cells, in addition to previously described neurons, Schwann cells and melanocytes. Finally, our results suggest that mural specification of BC derivatives takes place before their migration along nerves to the mouse skin.

Data availability

Single-cell RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-8972.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gaspard Gerschenfeld

    Developmental Biology, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, Université PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2456-704X
  2. Fanny Coulpier

    UMR U955 INSERM UPEC, Mondor Institute of Biomedical Research, Créteil, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aurélie Gresset

    Developmental Biology, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, Université PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pernelle Pulh

    Developmental Biology, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, Université PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bastien Job

    Inserm US23, AMMICA, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas Topilko

    Laboratoire de Plasticité Structurale, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Julie Siegenthaler, Ph.D.

    Department of Pediatrics Section of Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Maria Eleni Kastriti

    Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Isabelle Brunet

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5490-2937
  10. Patrick Charnay

    Developmental Biology, Ecole normale supérieure, CNRS, Inserm, Université PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Piotr Topilko

    UMR U955 INSERM UPEC, Mondor Institute of Biomedical Research, Créteil, France
    For correspondence
    piotr.topilko@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7381-6770

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-54 MEMOLIFE)

  • Patrick Charnay

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02 PSL* Research University)

  • Patrick Charnay

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

  • Patrick Charnay
  • Piotr Topilko

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Patrick Charnay
  • Piotr Topilko

Institut National Du Cancer

  • Patrick Charnay
  • Piotr Topilko

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Patrick Charnay
  • Piotr Topilko

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal manipulations were performed according to French and European Union regulations. According to these regulations, no ethics committee approval was required for this study which only used mouse embryos and newborns.

Copyright

© 2023, Gerschenfeld et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 549
    views
  • 123
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gaspard Gerschenfeld
  2. Fanny Coulpier
  3. Aurélie Gresset
  4. Pernelle Pulh
  5. Bastien Job
  6. Thomas Topilko
  7. Julie Siegenthaler, Ph.D.
  8. Maria Eleni Kastriti
  9. Isabelle Brunet
  10. Patrick Charnay
  11. Piotr Topilko
(2023)
Neural tube-associated boundary caps are a major source of mural cells in the skin
eLife 12:e69413.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69413

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69413

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Mengjie Li, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang
    Research Advance

    Stem cell self-renewal often relies on asymmetric fate determination governed by niche signals and/or cell-intrinsic factors but how these regulatory mechanisms cooperate to promote asymmetric fate decision remains poorly understood. In adult Drosophila midgut, asymmetric Notch (N) signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal by promoting ISC differentiation into enteroblast (EB). We have previously shown that epithelium-derived Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) promotes ISC self-renewal by antagonizing N pathway activity (Tian and Jiang, 2014). Here, we show that loss of BMP signaling results in ectopic N pathway activity even when the N ligand Delta (Dl) is depleted, and that the N inhibitor Numb acts in parallel with BMP signaling to ensure a robust ISC self-renewal program. Although Numb is asymmetrically segregated in about 80% of dividing ISCs, its activity is largely dispensable for ISC fate determination under normal homeostasis. However, Numb becomes crucial for ISC self-renewal when BMP signaling is compromised. Whereas neither Mad RNA interference nor its hypomorphic mutation led to ISC loss, inactivation of Numb in these backgrounds resulted in stem cell loss due to precocious ISC-to-EB differentiation. Furthermore, we find that numb mutations resulted in stem cell loss during midgut regeneration in response to epithelial damage that causes fluctuation in BMP pathway activity, suggesting that the asymmetrical segregation of Numb into the future ISC may provide a fail-save mechanism for ISC self-renewal by offsetting BMP pathway fluctuation, which is important for ISC maintenance in regenerative guts.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Eric R Brooks, Andrew R Moorman ... Jennifer A Zallen
    Tools and Resources

    The formation of the mammalian brain requires regionalization and morphogenesis of the cranial neural plate, which transforms from an epithelial sheet into a closed tube that provides the structural foundation for neural patterning and circuit formation. Sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling is important for cranial neural plate patterning and closure, but the transcriptional changes that give rise to the spatially regulated cell fates and behaviors that build the cranial neural tube have not been systematically analyzed. Here, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to generate an atlas of gene expression at six consecutive stages of cranial neural tube closure in the mouse embryo. Ordering transcriptional profiles relative to the major axes of gene expression predicted spatially regulated expression of 870 genes along the anterior-posterior and mediolateral axes of the cranial neural plate and reproduced known expression patterns with over 85% accuracy. Single-cell RNA sequencing of embryos with activated SHH signaling revealed distinct SHH-regulated transcriptional programs in the developing forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain, suggesting a complex interplay between anterior-posterior and mediolateral patterning systems. These results define a spatiotemporally resolved map of gene expression during cranial neural tube closure and provide a resource for investigating the transcriptional events that drive early mammalian brain development.