Lipid kinases VPS34 and PIKfyve coordinate a phosphoinositide cascade to regulate Retriever-mediated recycling on endosomes

  1. Sai Srinivas Panapakkam Giridharan
  2. Guangming Luo
  3. Pilar Rivero-Rios
  4. Noah Steinfeld
  5. Helene Tronchere
  6. Amika Singla
  7. Ezra Burstein
  8. Daniel D Billadeau
  9. Michael A Sutton
  10. Lois S Weisman  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, United States
  2. INSERM U1048 I2MC, France
  3. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  4. Mayo Clinic, United States

Abstract

Cell-surface receptors control how cells respond to their environment. Many cell-surface receptors recycle from endosomes to the plasma membrane via a recently discovered pathway, which includes sorting-nexin SNX17, Retriever, WASH and CCC complexes. Here, using mammalian cells, we discover that PIKfyve and its upstream PI3-kinase VPS34 positively regulate this pathway. VPS34 produces PI3P, which is the substrate for PIKfyve to generate PI3,5P2. We show that PIKfyve controls recycling of cargoes including integrins, receptors that control cell migration. Furthermore, endogenous PIKfyve colocalizes with SNX17, Retriever, WASH and CCC complexes on endosomes. Importantly, PIKfyve inhibition results displacement of Retriever and CCC from endosomes. In addition, we show that recruitment of SNX17 is an early step and requires VPS34. These discoveries suggest that VPS34 and PIKfyve coordinate an ordered pathway to regulate recycling from endosomes and suggest how PIKfyve functions in cell migration.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sai Srinivas Panapakkam Giridharan

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Guangming Luo

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pilar Rivero-Rios

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Noah Steinfeld

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Helene Tronchere

    INSERM U1048 I2MC, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Amika Singla

    Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ezra Burstein

    Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4341-6367
  8. Daniel D Billadeau

    Division of Oncology Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michael A Sutton

    Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1593-727X
  10. Lois S Weisman

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    lweisman@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7740-9785

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Research Project Grant R01 NS064015)

  • Lois S Weisman

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Research Project Grant R01-NS099340)

  • Lois S Weisman

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Research Project Grant R01-DK107733)

  • Ezra Burstein
  • Daniel D Billadeau

American Heart Association (Postdoctoral Fellowship 14POST20480137)

  • Sai Srinivas Panapakkam Giridharan

American Heart Association (Postdoctoral Fellowship 19POST34450253)

  • Guangming Luo

University of Michigan Protein Folding Diseases Fast Forward Initiative (Pilot grant)

  • Lois S Weisman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#A3114-01) of the University of Michigan. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Michigan (Approval # PRO00010100).

Copyright

© 2022, Giridharan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,537
    views
  • 710
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sai Srinivas Panapakkam Giridharan
  2. Guangming Luo
  3. Pilar Rivero-Rios
  4. Noah Steinfeld
  5. Helene Tronchere
  6. Amika Singla
  7. Ezra Burstein
  8. Daniel D Billadeau
  9. Michael A Sutton
  10. Lois S Weisman
(2022)
Lipid kinases VPS34 and PIKfyve coordinate a phosphoinositide cascade to regulate Retriever-mediated recycling on endosomes
eLife 11:e69709.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69709

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69709

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Heungjin Ryu, Kibum Nam ... Jung-Hoon Park
    Research Article

    In most murine species, spermatozoa exhibit a falciform apical hook at the head end. The function of the sperm hook is not yet clearly understood. In this study, we investigate the role of the sperm hook in the migration of spermatozoa through the female reproductive tract in Mus musculus (C57BL/6), using a deep tissue imaging custom-built two-photon microscope. Through live reproductive tract imaging, we found evidence indicating that the sperm hook aids in the attachment of spermatozoa to the epithelium and facilitates interactions between spermatozoa and the epithelium during migration in the uterus and oviduct. We also observed synchronized sperm beating, which resulted from the spontaneous unidirectional rearrangement of spermatozoa in the uterus. Based on live imaging of spermatozoa-epithelium interaction dynamics, we propose that the sperm hook plays a crucial role in successful migration through the female reproductive tract by providing anchor-like mechanical support and facilitating interactions between spermatozoa and the female reproductive tract in the house mouse.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.