Transcriptomic encoding of sensorimotor transformation in the midbrain

  1. Zhiyong Xie
  2. Mengdi Wang
  3. Zeyuan Liu
  4. Congping Shang
  5. Changjiang Zhang
  6. Le Sun
  7. Huating Gu
  8. Gengxin Ran
  9. Qing Pei
  10. Qiang Ma
  11. Meizhu Huang
  12. Junjing Zhang
  13. Rui Lin
  14. Youtong Zhou
  15. Jiyao Zhang
  16. Miao Zhao
  17. Minmin Luo
  18. Qian Wu  Is a corresponding author
  19. Peng Cao  Is a corresponding author
  20. Xiaoqun Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute of Biological Sciences, China
  2. Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  3. Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), China
  4. Capital Medical University, China
  5. Beijing Normal University, China
  6. National Institute of Biological Science, China
  7. National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract

Sensorimotor transformation, a process that converts sensory stimuli into motor actions, is critical for the brain to initiate behaviors. Although the circuitry involved in sensorimotor transformation has been well delineated, the molecular logic behind this process remains poorly understood. Here, we performed high-throughput and circuit-specific single-cell transcriptomic analyses of neurons in the superior colliculus (SC), a midbrain structure implicated in early sensorimotor transformation. We found that SC neurons in distinct laminae express discrete marker genes. Of particular interest, Cbln2 and Pitx2 are key markers that define glutamatergic projection neurons in the optic nerve (Op) and intermediate gray (InG) layers, respectively. The Cbln2+ neurons responded to visual stimuli mimicking cruising predators, while the Pitx2+ neurons encoded prey-derived vibrissal tactile cues. By forming distinct input and output connections with other brain areas, these neuronal subtypes independently mediate behaviors of predator avoidance and prey capture. Our results reveal that, in the midbrain, sensorimotor transformation for different behaviors may be performed by separate circuit modules that are molecularly defined by distinct transcriptomic codes.

Data availability

The scRNA-seq data used in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession numbers GSE162404 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE162404).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhiyong Xie

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mengdi Wang

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Zeyuan Liu

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0007-9874
  4. Congping Shang

    Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Changjiang Zhang

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Le Sun

    Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Huating Gu

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gengxin Ran

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Qing Pei

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Qiang Ma

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Meizhu Huang

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Junjing Zhang

    Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Rui Lin

    National Institute of Biological Science, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Youtong Zhou

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jiyao Zhang

    Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Miao Zhao

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Minmin Luo

    National Institute of Biological Science, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3535-6624
  18. Qian Wu

    Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    qianwu@ibp.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Peng Cao

    National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    caopeng@nibs.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Xiaoqun Wang

    Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    xiaoqunwang@ibp.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3440-2617

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2019YFA0110100; 2017YFA0103303)

  • Xiaoqun Wang

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2017YFA0102601)

  • Qian Wu

Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB32010100)

  • Xiaoqun Wang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31925019)

  • Peng Cao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771140; 81891001)

  • Xiaoqun Wang

BUAA-CCMU Big Data and Precision Medicine Advanced Innovation Center Project (BHME-2019001)

  • Xiaoqun Wang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Sacha B Nelson, Brandeis University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were conducted following protocols approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care at the National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing (NIBS) (NIBS2021M0006) and Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SYXK2019015).

Version history

  1. Received: April 27, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: April 28, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: July 25, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 28, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 5, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Xie et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,036
    Page views
  • 724
    Downloads
  • 21
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhiyong Xie
  2. Mengdi Wang
  3. Zeyuan Liu
  4. Congping Shang
  5. Changjiang Zhang
  6. Le Sun
  7. Huating Gu
  8. Gengxin Ran
  9. Qing Pei
  10. Qiang Ma
  11. Meizhu Huang
  12. Junjing Zhang
  13. Rui Lin
  14. Youtong Zhou
  15. Jiyao Zhang
  16. Miao Zhao
  17. Minmin Luo
  18. Qian Wu
  19. Peng Cao
  20. Xiaoqun Wang
(2021)
Transcriptomic encoding of sensorimotor transformation in the midbrain
eLife 10:e69825.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69825

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69825

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Flora Moujaes, Jie Lisa Ji ... Alan Anticevic
    Research Article

    Background:

    Ketamine has emerged as one of the most promising therapies for treatment-resistant depression. However, inter-individual variability in response to ketamine is still not well understood and it is unclear how ketamine’s molecular mechanisms connect to its neural and behavioral effects.

    Methods:

    We conducted a single-blind placebo-controlled study, with participants blinded to their treatment condition. 40 healthy participants received acute ketamine (initial bolus 0.23 mg/kg, continuous infusion 0.58 mg/kg/hr). We quantified resting-state functional connectivity via data-driven global brain connectivity and related it to individual ketamine-induced symptom variation and cortical gene expression targets.

    Results:

    We found that: (i) both the neural and behavioral effects of acute ketamine are multi-dimensional, reflecting robust inter-individual variability; (ii) ketamine’s data-driven principal neural gradient effect matched somatostatin (SST) and parvalbumin (PVALB) cortical gene expression patterns in humans, while the mean effect did not; and (iii) behavioral data-driven individual symptom variation mapped onto distinct neural gradients of ketamine, which were resolvable at the single-subject level.

    Conclusions:

    These results highlight the importance of considering individual behavioral and neural variation in response to ketamine. They also have implications for the development of individually precise pharmacological biomarkers for treatment selection in psychiatry.

    Funding:

    This study was supported by NIH grants DP5OD012109-01 (A.A.), 1U01MH121766 (A.A.), R01MH112746 (J.D.M.), 5R01MH112189 (A.A.), 5R01MH108590 (A.A.), NIAAA grant 2P50AA012870-11 (A.A.); NSF NeuroNex grant 2015276 (J.D.M.); Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Young Investigator Award (A.A.); SFARI Pilot Award (J.D.M., A.A.); Heffter Research Institute (Grant No. 1–190420) (FXV, KHP); Swiss Neuromatrix Foundation (Grant No. 2016–0111) (FXV, KHP); Swiss National Science Foundation under the framework of Neuron Cofund (Grant No. 01EW1908) (KHP); Usona Institute (2015 – 2056) (FXV).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT03842800

    1. Neuroscience
    Lies Deceuninck, Fabian Kloosterman
    Research Article Updated

    Storing and accessing memories is required to successfully perform day-to-day tasks, for example for engaging in a meaningful conversation. Previous studies in both rodents and primates have correlated hippocampal cellular activity with behavioral expression of memory. A key role has been attributed to awake hippocampal replay – a sequential reactivation of neurons representing a trajectory through space. However, it is unclear if awake replay impacts immediate future behavior, gradually creates and stabilizes long-term memories over a long period of time (hours and longer), or enables the temporary memorization of relevant events at an intermediate time scale (seconds to minutes). In this study, we aimed to address the uncertainty around the timeframe of impact of awake replay by collecting causal evidence from behaving rats. We detected and disrupted sharp wave ripples (SWRs) - signatures of putative replay events - using electrical stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure in rats that were trained on three different spatial memory tasks. In each task, rats were required to memorize a new set of locations in each trial or each daily session. Interestingly, the rats performed equally well with or without SWR disruptions. These data suggest that awake SWRs - and potentially replay - does not affect the immediate behavior nor the temporary memorization of relevant events at a short timescale that are required to successfully perform the spatial tasks. Based on these results, we hypothesize that the impact of awake replay on memory and behavior is long-term and cumulative over time.