(A) Overview of the experimental design with the four conditions genuine vs. pretended, pain vs. no pain. Examples show static images, while in the experiment participants were shown video clips. (B)…
(A) Activation maps of genuine: pain – no pain (top), pretended: pain - no pain (middle), and genuine (pain – no pain) – pretended (pain – no pain) (bottom). As expected, we found brain activations …
Region label | BA | Cluster size | X | Y | Z | t-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genuine: pain - no pain | ||||||
Lingual_R | 18 | 183,732 | 11 | −84 | −3 | 13.38 |
Temporal_Pole_Sup_R | 38 | 30 | 33 | −33 | 13.31 | |
Supp_Motor_Area_R | 8 | 5 | 15 | 51 | 12.96 | |
Supp_Motor_Area_R | 8 | 3 | 17 | 50 | 12.92 | |
Supp_Motor_Area_L | 8 | −5 | 17 | 48 | 12.56 | |
Insula_L | 45 | −32 | 26 | 6 | 12.32 | |
Insula_R | 45 | 33 | 29 | 3 | 12.09 | |
Frontal_Inf_Oper_R | 44 | 51 | 14 | 15 | 12.01 | |
Frontal_Inf_Oper_R | 44 | 50 | 12 | 18 | 11.79 | |
Precentral_L | 6 | −42 | 3 | 39 | 11.72 | |
Fusiform_R | 20 | 463 | 36 | −5 | −41 | 5.58 |
Pretended: pain - no pain | ||||||
Supp_Motor_Area_R | 8 | 59,665 | 5 | 20 | 48 | 11.80 |
Supp_Motor_Area_L | 8 | −6 | 18 | 50 | 11.14 | |
Frontal_Inf_Oper_L | 44 | −50 | 15 | 15 | 10.39 | |
Insula_R | 45 | 33 | 29 | 0 | 9.81 | |
Insula_L | 45 | −29 | 30 | 0 | 9.60 | |
Frontal_Inf_Tri_R | 44 | 47 | 15 | 26 | 9.21 | |
Precuneus_L | 7 | 35,136 | −9 | −71 | 41 | 10.27 |
Parietal_Inf_L | 39 | −32 | −51 | 41 | 9.39 | |
Precuneus_R | 7 | 9 | −69 | 38 | 8.44 | |
Temporal_Mid_L | 21 | −53 | −47 | 5 | 7.67 | |
Occipital_Mid_L | 19 | −44 | −78 | 2 | 7.47 | |
Parietal_Inf_R | 39 | 39 | −50 | 41 | 7.25 | |
Temporal_Mid_R | 22 | 12,970 | 51 | −20 | –6 | 7.70 |
Lingual_R | 17 | 12 | −86 | −2 | 7.40 | |
Fusiform_R | 37 | 47 | −33 | −27 | 5.32 | |
Occipital_Mid_R | 18 | 33 | −86 | 3 | 5.23 | |
Cingulum_Mid_R | 23 | 1666 | −3 | −14 | 27 | 6.35 |
Cingulum_Mid_L | 23 | −3 | −24 | 32 | 5.57 | |
Temporal_Pole_Sup_R | 47 | 589 | 32 | 35 | −33 | 7.18 |
Frontal_Sup_Orb_R | 11 | 17 | 41 | −24 | 3.36 | |
Genuine (pain – no pain) – pretended (pain – no pain) | ||||||
SupraMarginal_L | 40 | 1877 | −66 | −21 | 32 | 4.94 |
Postcentral_L | 1 | −50 | −21 | 26 | 3.75 | |
SupraMarginal_R | 40 | 1833 | 63 | −20 | 42 | 5.09 |
Rolandic_Oper_R | 40 | 59 | −15 | 14 | 4.47 | |
Insula_L | 13 | 1299 | −38 | −3 | −2 | 5.01 |
Rolandic_Oper_L | 4 | −45 | −6 | 8 | 4.8 | |
Cingulum_Ant_L | 32 | 1138 | 0 | 41 | 17 | 4.54 |
Cingulum_Mid_R | 32 | 2 | 24 | 32 | 4.45 | |
Cingulum_Mid_L | 24 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 4.43 | |
Cingulum_Ant_R | 8 | 2 | 32 | 27 | 4.42 | |
Lingual_R | 18 | 1003 | 9 | −84 | −3 | 5.72 |
Calcarine_R | 17 | 18 | −78 | 8 | 3.61 | |
Insula_R | 13 | 225 | 39 | 8 | −3 | 3.91 |
Rolandic_Oper_R | 13 | 41 | 0 | 11 | 3.77 |
Model comparison of linear regression models with three behavioral ratings (independent variables) and the inhibitory effect (dependent variable) for genuine pain and pretended pain.
Smaller AIC/BIC indicates better model fit. Results showed that M1 (without interaction; highlighted with underlining) was the best fitting model for both genuine pain and pretended pain.