Proximal and distal spinal neurons innervating multiple synergist and antagonist motor pools
Abstract
Motoneurons control muscle contractions, and their recruitment by premotor circuits is tuned to produce accurate motor behaviours. To understand how these circuits coordinate movement across and between joints, it is necessary to understand whether spinal neurons pre-synaptic to motor pools have divergent projections to more than one motoneuron population. Here, we used modified rabies virus tracing in mice to investigate premotor INs projecting to synergist flexor or extensor motoneurons, as well as those projecting to antagonist pairs of muscles controlling the ankle joint. We show that similar proportions of premotor neurons diverge to synergist and antagonist motor pools. Divergent premotor neurons were seen throughout the spinal cord, with decreasing numbers but increasing proportion with distance from the hindlimb enlargement. In the cervical cord, divergent long descending propriospinal neurons were found in contralateral lamina VIII, had large somata, were neither glycinergic, nor cholinergic, and projected to both lumbar and cervical motoneurons. We conclude that distributed spinal premotor neurons coordinate activity across multiple motor pools and that there are spinal neurons mediating co-contraction of antagonist muscles.
Data availability
All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided as Supplementary information for Figures 1 to 7 in the main text and for supplementary Figures S1 to S5. The data in supplementary Figure 1 are reported in the Supplementary Table 3
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2013-176)
- Marco Beato
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L001454)
- Marco Beato
Wellcome Trust (110193)
- Robert M Brownstone
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in strict adherence to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act UK (1986) and certified by the UCL AWERB committee, under project licence number 70/7621. All surgeries were performed under general isofluorane anaesthesia and before surgery animals were injected subcutaneously with an analgesic (carprofen, 1 μl, 10% w/v) and the mice were closely monitored for a 24 hours period following surgery to detect any sign of distress or motor impairment. Every effort was made to minimize suffering
Copyright
© 2021, Ronzano et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,705
- views
-
- 369
- downloads
-
- 33
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Citations by DOI
-
- 33
- citations for umbrella DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70858