Genetically engineered insects with sex-selection and genetic incompatibility enable population suppression

  1. Ambuj Upadhyay
  2. Nathan R Feltman
  3. Adam Sychla
  4. Anna Janzen
  5. Siba R Das
  6. Maciej Maselko
  7. Michael Smanski  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Macquarie University, Australia

Abstract

Engineered Genetic Incompatibility (EGI) is a method to create species-like barriers to sexual reproduction. It has applications in pest control that mimic Sterile Insect Technique when only EGI males are released. This can be facilitated by introducing conditional female-lethality to EGI strains to generate a sex-sorting incompatible male system (SSIMS). Here, we demonstrate a proof of concept by combining tetracycline-controlled female lethality constructs with a pyramus-targeting EGI line in the model insect Drosophila melanogaster. We show that both functions (incompatibility and sex-sorting) are robustly maintained in the SSIMS line and that this approach is effective for population suppression in cage experiments. Further we show that SSIMS males remain competitive with wild-type males for reproduction with wild-type females, including at the level of sperm competition.

Data availability

All data is available in the manuscript

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ambuj Upadhyay

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    Ambuj Upadhyay, Inventor of filed patents (PCT/US2019/059826).
  2. Nathan R Feltman

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    Nathan R Feltman, Inventor of filed patents.(PCT/US2019/059826).
  3. Adam Sychla

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Anna Janzen

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Siba R Das

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    Siba R Das, Inventor on filed IP, co-founder of Novoclade. (PCT/US2019/059826).
  6. Maciej Maselko

    Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    Maciej Maselko, Inventor of filed IP; co-founder of Novoclade. (PCT/US2019/059826).
  7. Michael Smanski

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    For correspondence
    smanski@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    Michael Smanski, Inventor on filed patents and co-founder of Novoclade. (PCT/US2019/059826).
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6029-8326

Funding

Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center, University of Minnesota

  • Michael Smanski

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

  • Michael Smanski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Work with invertebrates (e.g. D. melanogaster) is exempt from the University of Minnesota's IACUC research oversight, however all work was approved by UMN's Institutional Biosafety Committee.

Copyright

© 2022, Upadhyay et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,888
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ambuj Upadhyay
  2. Nathan R Feltman
  3. Adam Sychla
  4. Anna Janzen
  5. Siba R Das
  6. Maciej Maselko
  7. Michael Smanski
(2022)
Genetically engineered insects with sex-selection and genetic incompatibility enable population suppression
eLife 11:e71230.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71230

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71230

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Eric V Strobl, Eric Gamazon
    Research Article

    Root causal gene expression levels – or root causal genes for short – correspond to the initial changes to gene expression that generate patient symptoms as a downstream effect. Identifying root causal genes is critical towards developing treatments that modify disease near its onset, but no existing algorithms attempt to identify root causal genes from data. RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data introduces challenges such as measurement error, high dimensionality and non-linearity that compromise accurate estimation of root causal effects even with state-of-the-art approaches. We therefore instead leverage Perturb-seq, or high-throughput perturbations with single-cell RNA-seq readout, to learn the causal order between the genes. We then transfer the causal order to bulk RNA-seq and identify root causal genes specific to a given patient for the first time using a novel statistic. Experiments demonstrate large improvements in performance. Applications to macular degeneration and multiple sclerosis also reveal root causal genes that lie on known pathogenic pathways, delineate patient subgroups and implicate a newly defined omnigenic root causal model.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.