Lactate is an energy substrate for rodent cortical neurons and enhances their firing activity

  1. Anastassios Karagiannis
  2. Thierry Gallopin
  3. Alexandre Lacroix
  4. Fabrice Plaisier
  5. Juliette Piquet
  6. Hélène Geoffroy
  7. Régine Hepp
  8. Jérémie Naudé
  9. Benjamin Le Gac
  10. Richard Egger
  11. Bertrand Lambolez
  12. Dongdong Li
  13. Jean Rossier
  14. Jochen F Staiger
  15. Hiromi Imamura
  16. Susumu Seino
  17. Jochen Roeper
  18. Bruno Cauli  Is a corresponding author
  1. CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, France
  2. CNRS, ESPCI Paris, France
  3. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  4. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, France
  5. Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany
  6. Kyoto University, Japan
  7. Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan

Abstract

Glucose is the mandatory fuel for the brain, yet the relative contribution of glucose and lactate for neuronal energy metabolism is unclear. We found that increased lactate, but not glucose concentration, enhances the spiking activity of neurons of the cerebral cortex. Enhanced spiking was dependent on ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels formed with KCNJ11 and ABCC8 subunits, which we show are functionally expressed in most neocortical neuronal types. We also demonstrate the ability of cortical neurons to take-up and metabolize lactate. We further reveal that ATP is produced by cortical neurons largely via oxidative phosphorylation and only modestly by glycolysis. Our data demonstrate that in active neurons, lactate is preferred to glucose as an energy substrate, and that lactate metabolism shapes neuronal activity in the neocortex through KATP channels. Our results highlight the importance of metabolic crosstalk between neurons and astrocytes for brain function.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1 to 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anastassios Karagiannis

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Thierry Gallopin

    Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS UMR 8249, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexandre Lacroix

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Fabrice Plaisier

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Juliette Piquet

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hélène Geoffroy

    Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS UMR 8249, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Régine Hepp

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jérémie Naudé

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5781-6498
  9. Benjamin Le Gac

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Richard Egger

    Institute for Neurophysiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Bertrand Lambolez

    Neuroscience Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (NPS - IBPS), Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0653-480X
  12. Dongdong Li

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jean Rossier

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1821-2135
  14. Jochen F Staiger

    Institute for Neuroanatomy, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Hiromi Imamura

    Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1896-0443
  16. Susumu Seino

    Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Jochen Roeper

    Institute for Neurophysiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2145-8742
  18. Bruno Cauli

    CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    bruno.cauli@upmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1471-4621

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0070/2007)

  • Bruno Cauli

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR 2011 MALZ 003 01)

  • Bruno Cauli

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT20100920106)

  • Anastassios Karagiannis

Fondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer

  • Benjamin Le Gac

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Wistar rats, C57BL/6RJ or Kcnj11-/- (B6.129P2-Kcnj11tm1Sse, backcrossed into C57BL6 over six generations) mice were used for all experiments in accordance with French regulations (Code Rural R214/87 to R214/130) and conformed to the ethical guidelines of both the directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and the French National Charter on the ethics of animal experimentation. A maximum of 3 rats or 5 mice were housed per cage and single animal housing was avoided. Male rats and mice of both genders were housed on a 12-hour light/dark cycle in a temperature-controlled (21-25{degree sign}C) room and were given food and water ad libitum. Animals were used for experimentation at 13-24 days of age.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marco Capogna, University of Aarhus, Denmark

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: May 17, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: June 18, 2021
  3. Accepted: November 9, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 12, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 7, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Karagiannis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,581
    Page views
  • 476
    Downloads
  • 20
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anastassios Karagiannis
  2. Thierry Gallopin
  3. Alexandre Lacroix
  4. Fabrice Plaisier
  5. Juliette Piquet
  6. Hélène Geoffroy
  7. Régine Hepp
  8. Jérémie Naudé
  9. Benjamin Le Gac
  10. Richard Egger
  11. Bertrand Lambolez
  12. Dongdong Li
  13. Jean Rossier
  14. Jochen F Staiger
  15. Hiromi Imamura
  16. Susumu Seino
  17. Jochen Roeper
  18. Bruno Cauli
(2021)
Lactate is an energy substrate for rodent cortical neurons and enhances their firing activity
eLife 10:e71424.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71424

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Elisabeth Jongsma, Anita Goyala ... Collin Yvès Ewald
    Research Article Updated

    The amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques found in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients’ brains contain collagens and are embedded extracellularly. Several collagens have been proposed to influence Aβ aggregate formation, yet their role in clearance is unknown. To investigate the potential role of collagens in forming and clearance of extracellular aggregates in vivo, we created a transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans strain that expresses and secretes human Aβ1-42. This secreted Aβ forms aggregates in two distinct places within the extracellular matrix. In a screen for extracellular human Aβ aggregation regulators, we identified different collagens to ameliorate or potentiate Aβ aggregation. We show that a disintegrin and metalloprotease a disintegrin and metalloprotease 2 (ADM-2), an ortholog of ADAM9, reduces the load of extracellular Aβ aggregates. ADM-2 is required and sufficient to remove the extracellular Aβ aggregates. Thus, we provide in vivo evidence of collagens essential for aggregate formation and metalloprotease participating in extracellular Aβ aggregate removal.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Marjorie Xie, Samuel P Muscinelli ... Ashok Litwin-Kumar
    Research Article Updated

    The cerebellar granule cell layer has inspired numerous theoretical models of neural representations that support learned behaviors, beginning with the work of Marr and Albus. In these models, granule cells form a sparse, combinatorial encoding of diverse sensorimotor inputs. Such sparse representations are optimal for learning to discriminate random stimuli. However, recent observations of dense, low-dimensional activity across granule cells have called into question the role of sparse coding in these neurons. Here, we generalize theories of cerebellar learning to determine the optimal granule cell representation for tasks beyond random stimulus discrimination, including continuous input-output transformations as required for smooth motor control. We show that for such tasks, the optimal granule cell representation is substantially denser than predicted by classical theories. Our results provide a general theory of learning in cerebellum-like systems and suggest that optimal cerebellar representations are task-dependent.