Interplay of surface interaction and magnetic torque in single-cell motion of magnetotactic bacteria in microfluidic confinement

  1. Agnese Codutti
  2. Mohammad A Charsooghi
  3. Elisa Cerdá-Doñate
  4. Hubert M Taïeb
  5. Tom Robinson  Is a corresponding author
  6. Damien Faivre  Is a corresponding author
  7. Stefan Klumpp  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Germany
  2. CEA Cadarache, France
  3. University of Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

Swimming microorganisms often experience complex environments in their natural habitat. The same is true for microswimmers in envisioned biomedical applications. The simple aqueous conditions typically studied in the lab differ strongly from those found in these environments and often exclude the effects of small volume confinement or the influence that external fields have on their motion. In this work, we investigate magnetically steerable microswimmers, specifically magnetotactic bacteria, in strong spatial confinement and under the influence of an external magnetic field. We trap single cells in micrometer-sized microfluidic chambers and track and analyze their motion, which shows a variety of different trajectories, depending on the chamber size and the strength of the magnetic field. Combining these experimental observations with simulations using a variant of an active Brownian particle model, we explain the variety of trajectories by the interplay between the wall interactions and the magnetic torque. We also analyze the pronounced cell-to-cell heterogeneity, which makes single-cell tracking essential for an understanding of the motility patterns. In this way, our work establishes a basis for the analysis and prediction of microswimmer motility in more complex environments.

Data availability

All data (experimental and simulatedl trajectories) as well as analysis and simulation code has been deposited at Edmond, https://doi.org/10.17617/3.7b

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Agnese Codutti

    Biomaterials Department, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mohammad A Charsooghi

    Biomaterials Department, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elisa Cerdá-Doñate

    Biomaterials Department, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hubert M Taïeb

    Biomaterials Department, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7530-8988
  5. Tom Robinson

    Theory and Bio‐systems Department, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany
    For correspondence
    tom.robinson@mpikg.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5236-7179
  6. Damien Faivre

    BIAM, CEA Cadarache, Saint Paul lez Durance, France
    For correspondence
    damien.faivre@cea.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6191-3389
  7. Stefan Klumpp

    Institute for the Dynamics of Complex Systems, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    For correspondence
    stefan.klumpp@phys.uni-goettingen.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0584-2146

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL 818/2-2)

  • Stefan Klumpp

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FA 835/7-2)

  • Damien Faivre

BMBF and Max Planck Society (MaxSynBio)

  • Tom Robinson

IMPRS on Multiscale Biosystems (n/a)

  • Agnese Codutti

IMPRS on Multiscale Biosystems (n/a)

  • Elisa Cerdá-Doñate

IMPRS on Multisclale Biosystems (n/a)

  • Hubert M Taïeb

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Raymond E Goldstein, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: March 27, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: June 24, 2021
  3. Accepted: July 18, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 9, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Codutti et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,136
    views
  • 291
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Agnese Codutti
  2. Mohammad A Charsooghi
  3. Elisa Cerdá-Doñate
  4. Hubert M Taïeb
  5. Tom Robinson
  6. Damien Faivre
  7. Stefan Klumpp
(2022)
Interplay of surface interaction and magnetic torque in single-cell motion of magnetotactic bacteria in microfluidic confinement
eLife 11:e71527.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71527

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71527

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Fabien Duveau, Céline Cordier ... Pascal Hersen
    Research Article

    Natural environments of living organisms are often dynamic and multifactorial, with multiple parameters fluctuating over time. To better understand how cells respond to dynamically interacting factors, we quantified the effects of dual fluctuations of osmotic stress and glucose deprivation on yeast cells using microfluidics and time-lapse microscopy. Strikingly, we observed that cell proliferation, survival, and signaling depend on the phasing of the two periodic stresses. Cells divided faster, survived longer, and showed decreased transcriptional response when fluctuations of hyperosmotic stress and glucose deprivation occurred in phase than when the two stresses occurred alternatively. Therefore, glucose availability regulates yeast responses to dynamic osmotic stress, showcasing the key role of metabolic fluctuations in cellular responses to dynamic stress. We also found that mutants with impaired osmotic stress response were better adapted to alternating stresses than wild-type cells, showing that genetic mechanisms of adaptation to a persistent stress factor can be detrimental under dynamically interacting conditions.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Josep-Maria Armengol-Collado, Livio Nicola Carenza, Luca Giomi
    Research Article Updated

    We formulate a hydrodynamic theory of confluent epithelia: i.e. monolayers of epithelial cells adhering to each other without gaps. Taking advantage of recent progresses toward establishing a general hydrodynamic theory of p-atic liquid crystals, we demonstrate that collectively migrating epithelia feature both nematic (i.e. p = 2) and hexatic (i.e. p = 6) orders, with the former being dominant at large and the latter at small length scales. Such a remarkable multiscale liquid crystal order leaves a distinct signature in the system’s structure factor, which exhibits two different power-law scaling regimes, reflecting both the hexagonal geometry of small cells clusters and the uniaxial structure of the global cellular flow. We support these analytical predictions with two different cell-resolved models of epithelia – i.e. the self-propelled Voronoi model and the multiphase field model – and highlight how momentum dissipation and noise influence the range of fluctuations at small length scales, thereby affecting the degree of cooperativity between cells. Our construction provides a theoretical framework to conceptualize the recent observation of multiscale order in layers of Madin–Darby canine kidney cells and pave the way for further theoretical developments.