Distributed coding of duration in rodent prefrontal cortex during time reproduction

Abstract

As we interact with the external world, we judge magnitudes from sensory information. The estimation of magnitudes has been characterized in primates, yet it is largely unexplored in non-primate species. Here we use time interval reproduction to study rodent behavior and its neural correlates in the context of magnitude estimation. We show that gerbils display primate-like magnitude estimation characteristics in time reproduction. Most prominently their behavioral responses show a systematic overestimation of small stimuli and an underestimation of large stimuli, often referred to as regression effect. We investigated the underlying neural mechanisms by recording from medial prefrontal cortex and show that the majority of neurons respond either during the measurement or the reproduction of a time interval. Cells that are active during both phases display distinct response patterns. We categorize the neural responses into multiple types and demonstrate that only populations with mixed responses can encode the bias of the regression effect. These results help unveil the organizing neural principles of time reproduction and perhaps magnitude estimation in general.

Data availability

Raw data for this study are available at https://doi.org/10.12751/g-node.tarvrs (Henke et al., 2021).In addition, source data are given when mentioned in the respective figures.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Josephine Henke

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David Bunk

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dina von Werder

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4193-5203
  4. Stefan Häusler

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Virginia L Flanagin

    German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders,, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kay Thurley

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    thurley@bio.lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4857-1083

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (01GQ1004A)

  • Josephine Henke
  • Kay Thurley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved according to national and European guidelines on animal welfare (Reg. von Oberbayern, District Government of Upper Bavaria; reference numbers: AZ 55.2-1-54-2532-10-11 and AZ 55.2-1-54-2532-70-2016).

Copyright

© 2021, Henke et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,464
    views
  • 258
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Josephine Henke
  2. David Bunk
  3. Dina von Werder
  4. Stefan Häusler
  5. Virginia L Flanagin
  6. Kay Thurley
(2021)
Distributed coding of duration in rodent prefrontal cortex during time reproduction
eLife 10:e71612.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71612

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71612

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Matthew R Kleinman, David J Foster
    Research Article

    Sequenced reactivations of hippocampal neurons called replays, concomitant with sharp-wave ripples in the local field potential, are critical for the consolidation of episodic memory, but whether replays depend on the brain’s reward or novelty signals is unknown. Here, we combined chemogenetic silencing of dopamine neurons in ventral tegmental area (VTA) and simultaneous electrophysiological recordings in dorsal hippocampal CA1, in freely behaving male rats experiencing changes to reward magnitude and environmental novelty. Surprisingly, VTA silencing did not prevent ripple increases where reward was increased, but caused dramatic, aberrant ripple increases where reward was unchanged. These increases were associated with increased reverse-ordered replays. On familiar tracks this effect disappeared, and ripples tracked reward prediction error (RPE), indicating that non-VTA reward signals were sufficient to direct replay. Our results reveal a novel dependence of hippocampal replay on dopamine, and a role for a VTA-independent RPE signal that is reliable only in familiar environments.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shuo Zhang, Yan Tian ... Haiyan Wu
    Research Article

    Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.