Distributed coding of duration in rodent prefrontal cortex during time reproduction

Abstract

As we interact with the external world, we judge magnitudes from sensory information. The estimation of magnitudes has been characterized in primates, yet it is largely unexplored in non-primate species. Here we use time interval reproduction to study rodent behavior and its neural correlates in the context of magnitude estimation. We show that gerbils display primate-like magnitude estimation characteristics in time reproduction. Most prominently their behavioral responses show a systematic overestimation of small stimuli and an underestimation of large stimuli, often referred to as regression effect. We investigated the underlying neural mechanisms by recording from medial prefrontal cortex and show that the majority of neurons respond either during the measurement or the reproduction of a time interval. Cells that are active during both phases display distinct response patterns. We categorize the neural responses into multiple types and demonstrate that only populations with mixed responses can encode the bias of the regression effect. These results help unveil the organizing neural principles of time reproduction and perhaps magnitude estimation in general.

Data availability

Raw data for this study are available at https://doi.org/10.12751/g-node.tarvrs (Henke et al., 2021).In addition, source data are given when mentioned in the respective figures.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Josephine Henke

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. David Bunk

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Dina von Werder

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4193-5203
  4. Stefan Häusler

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Virginia L Flanagin

    German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders,, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kay Thurley

    Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
    For correspondence
    thurley@bio.lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4857-1083

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (01GQ1004A)

  • Josephine Henke
  • Kay Thurley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved according to national and European guidelines on animal welfare (Reg. von Oberbayern, District Government of Upper Bavaria; reference numbers: AZ 55.2-1-54-2532-10-11 and AZ 55.2-1-54-2532-70-2016).

Copyright

© 2021, Henke et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,445
    views
  • 253
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Josephine Henke
  2. David Bunk
  3. Dina von Werder
  4. Stefan Häusler
  5. Virginia L Flanagin
  6. Kay Thurley
(2021)
Distributed coding of duration in rodent prefrontal cortex during time reproduction
eLife 10:e71612.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71612

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71612

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Geoffrey W Meissner, Allison Vannan ... FlyLight Project Team
    Research Article

    Techniques that enable precise manipulations of subsets of neurons in the fly central nervous system (CNS) have greatly facilitated our understanding of the neural basis of behavior. Split-GAL4 driver lines allow specific targeting of cell types in Drosophila melanogaster and other species. We describe here a collection of 3060 lines targeting a range of cell types in the adult Drosophila CNS and 1373 lines characterized in third-instar larvae. These tools enable functional, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies based on precise anatomical targeting. NeuronBridge and other search tools relate light microscopy images of these split-GAL4 lines to connectomes reconstructed from electron microscopy images. The collections are the result of screening over 77,000 split hemidriver combinations. Previously published and new lines are included, all validated for driver expression and curated for optimal cell-type specificity across diverse cell types. In addition to images and fly stocks for these well-characterized lines, we make available 300,000 new 3D images of other split-GAL4 lines.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hyun Jee Lee, Jingting Liang ... Hang Lu
    Research Advance

    Cell identification is an important yet difficult process in data analysis of biological images. Previously, we developed an automated cell identification method called CRF_ID and demonstrated its high performance in Caenorhabditis elegans whole-brain images (Chaudhary et al., 2021). However, because the method was optimized for whole-brain imaging, comparable performance could not be guaranteed for application in commonly used C. elegans multi-cell images that display a subpopulation of cells. Here, we present an advancement, CRF_ID 2.0, that expands the generalizability of the method to multi-cell imaging beyond whole-brain imaging. To illustrate the application of the advance, we show the characterization of CRF_ID 2.0 in multi-cell imaging and cell-specific gene expression analysis in C. elegans. This work demonstrates that high-accuracy automated cell annotation in multi-cell imaging can expedite cell identification and reduce its subjectivity in C. elegans and potentially other biological images of various origins.