NBI-921352, a first-in-class, NaV1.6 selective, sodium channel inhibitor that prevents seizures in Scn8a gain-of-function mice, and wild-type mice and rats
Abstract
NBI-921352 (formerly XEN901) is a novel sodium channel inhibitor designed to specifically target NaV1.6 channels. Such a molecule provides a precision-medicine approach to target SCN8A-related epilepsy syndromes (SCN8A-RES), where gain-of-function (GoF) mutations lead to excess NaV1.6 sodium current, or other indications where NaV1.6 mediated hyper-excitability contributes to disease (Gardella & Moller, 2019; Johannesen et al., 2019; Veeramah et al., 2012). NBI-921352 is a potent inhibitor of NaV1.6 (IC50 0.051 µM), with exquisite selectivity over other sodium channel isoforms (selectivity ratios of 756X for NaV1.1, 134X for NaV1.2, 276X for NaV1.7, and >583X for NaV1.3, NaV1.4, and NaV1.5). NBI-921352 is a state-dependent inhibitor, preferentially inhibiting inactivated channels. The state dependence leads to potent stabilization of inactivation, inhibiting NaV1.6 currents, including resurgent and persistent NaV1.6 currents, while sparing the closed/rested channels. The isoform-selective profile of NBI-921352 led to a robust inhibition of action-potential firing in glutamatergic excitatory pyramidal neurons, while sparing fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons, where NaV1.1 predominates. Oral administration of NBI-921352 prevented electrically induced seizures in a Scn8a GoF mouse, as well as in wild-type mouse and rat seizure models. NBI-921352 was effective in preventing seizures at lower brain and plasma concentrations than commonly prescribed sodium channel inhibitor anti-seizure medicines (ASMs) carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lacosamide. NBI-921352 was well tolerated at higher multiples of the effective plasma and brain concentrations than those ASMs. NBI-921352 is entering phase II proof-of-concept trials for the treatment of SCN8A-developmental epileptic encephalopathy (SCN8A-DEE) and adult focal-onset seizures.
Data availability
All the numerical data used to generate the figures in contained in the excel data source file included in the submission.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Xenon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- JP Johnson Jr
- Thilo Focken
- Kuldip Khakh
- Parisa Karimi Tari
- Celine Dube
- Samuel J Goodchild
- Jean-Christophe Andrez
- Girish Bankar
- David Bogucki
- Kristen Burford
- Elaine Chang
- Sultan Chowdhury
- Richard Dean
- Gina de Boer
- Shannon Decker
- Christoph Dehnhardt
- Mandy Feng
- Wei Gong
- Michael Grimwood
- Abid Hasan
- Angela Hussainkhel
- Qi Jia
- Stephanie Lee
- Jenny Li
- Sophia Lin
- Andrea Lindgren
- Verner Lofstrand
- Janette Mezeyova
- Rostam Namdari
- Karen Nelkenbrecher
- Noah Gregory Shuart
- Luis Sojo
- Shaoyi Sun
- Matthew Taron
- Matthew Waldbrook
- Diana Weeratunge
- Steven Wesolowski
- Aaron Williams
- Michael Wilson
- Zhiwei Xie
- Rhena Yoo
- Clint Young
- Alla Zenova
- Wei Zhang
- Alison J Cutts
- Robin P Sherrington
- Simon N Pimstone
- Raymond Winquist
- Charles J Cohen
- James R Empfield
All of this work was funded by Xenon Pharmaceuticals, and all of the authors are, or were previously, employees of Xenon Pharmaceuticals.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal research was overseen by the Xenon Animal Care Committee and the Canadian Animal Care Council (CACC) according the recommendations of the CACC (https://ccac.ca/).
Copyright
© 2022, Johnson et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,791
- views
-
- 780
- downloads
-
- 41
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Neuroscience
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by mutations in the Survival Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. While traditionally viewed as a motor neuron disorder, there is involvement of various peripheral organs in SMA. Notably, fatty liver has been observed in SMA mouse models and SMA patients. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether intrinsic depletion of SMN protein in the liver contributes to pathology in the peripheral or central nervous systems. To address this, we developed a mouse model with a liver-specific depletion of SMN by utilizing an Alb-Cre transgene together with one Smn2B allele and one Smn1 exon 7 allele flanked by loxP sites. Initially, we evaluated phenotypic changes in these mice at postnatal day 19 (P19), when the severe model of SMA, the Smn2B/- mice, exhibit many symptoms of the disease. The liver-specific SMN depletion does not induce motor neuron death, neuromuscular pathology or muscle atrophy, characteristics typically observed in the Smn2B/- mouse at P19. However, mild liver steatosis was observed, although no changes in liver function were detected. Notably, pancreatic alterations resembled that of Smn2B/-mice, with a decrease in insulin-producing β-cells and an increase in glucagon-producingα-cells, accompanied by a reduction in blood glucose and an increase in plasma glucagon and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1). These changes were transient, as mice at P60 exhibited recovery of liver and pancreatic function. While the mosaic pattern of the Cre-mediated excision precludes definitive conclusions regarding the contribution of liver-specific SMN depletion to overall tissue pathology, our findings highlight an intricate connection between liver function and pancreatic abnormalities in SMA.
-
- Neuroscience
Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of ‘exposure.’ Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS- discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS+ responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of ‘exposure’ following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS- is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.