NBI-921352, a first-in-class, NaV1.6 selective, sodium channel inhibitor that prevents seizures in Scn8a gain-of-function mice, and wild-type mice and rats
Abstract
NBI-921352 (formerly XEN901) is a novel sodium channel inhibitor designed to specifically target NaV1.6 channels. Such a molecule provides a precision-medicine approach to target SCN8A-related epilepsy syndromes (SCN8A-RES), where gain-of-function (GoF) mutations lead to excess NaV1.6 sodium current, or other indications where NaV1.6 mediated hyper-excitability contributes to disease (Gardella & Moller, 2019; Johannesen et al., 2019; Veeramah et al., 2012). NBI-921352 is a potent inhibitor of NaV1.6 (IC50 0.051 µM), with exquisite selectivity over other sodium channel isoforms (selectivity ratios of 756X for NaV1.1, 134X for NaV1.2, 276X for NaV1.7, and >583X for NaV1.3, NaV1.4, and NaV1.5). NBI-921352 is a state-dependent inhibitor, preferentially inhibiting inactivated channels. The state dependence leads to potent stabilization of inactivation, inhibiting NaV1.6 currents, including resurgent and persistent NaV1.6 currents, while sparing the closed/rested channels. The isoform-selective profile of NBI-921352 led to a robust inhibition of action-potential firing in glutamatergic excitatory pyramidal neurons, while sparing fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons, where NaV1.1 predominates. Oral administration of NBI-921352 prevented electrically induced seizures in a Scn8a GoF mouse, as well as in wild-type mouse and rat seizure models. NBI-921352 was effective in preventing seizures at lower brain and plasma concentrations than commonly prescribed sodium channel inhibitor anti-seizure medicines (ASMs) carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lacosamide. NBI-921352 was well tolerated at higher multiples of the effective plasma and brain concentrations than those ASMs. NBI-921352 is entering phase II proof-of-concept trials for the treatment of SCN8A-developmental epileptic encephalopathy (SCN8A-DEE) and adult focal-onset seizures.
Data availability
All the numerical data used to generate the figures in contained in the excel data source file included in the submission.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Xenon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- JP Johnson Jr
- Thilo Focken
- Kuldip Khakh
- Parisa Karimi Tari
- Celine Dube
- Samuel J Goodchild
- Jean-Christophe Andrez
- Girish Bankar
- David Bogucki
- Kristen Burford
- Elaine Chang
- Sultan Chowdhury
- Richard Dean
- Gina de Boer
- Shannon Decker
- Christoph Dehnhardt
- Mandy Feng
- Wei Gong
- Michael Grimwood
- Abid Hasan
- Angela Hussainkhel
- Qi Jia
- Stephanie Lee
- Jenny Li
- Sophia Lin
- Andrea Lindgren
- Verner Lofstrand
- Janette Mezeyova
- Rostam Namdari
- Karen Nelkenbrecher
- Noah Gregory Shuart
- Luis Sojo
- Shaoyi Sun
- Matthew Taron
- Matthew Waldbrook
- Diana Weeratunge
- Steven Wesolowski
- Aaron Williams
- Michael Wilson
- Zhiwei Xie
- Rhena Yoo
- Clint Young
- Alla Zenova
- Wei Zhang
- Alison J Cutts
- Robin P Sherrington
- Simon N Pimstone
- Raymond Winquist
- Charles J Cohen
- James R Empfield
All of this work was funded by Xenon Pharmaceuticals, and all of the authors are, or were previously, employees of Xenon Pharmaceuticals.
Reviewing Editor
- Baron Chanda, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All animal research was overseen by the Xenon Animal Care Committee and the Canadian Animal Care Council (CACC) according the recommendations of the CACC (https://ccac.ca/).
Version history
- Received: July 24, 2021
- Preprint posted: August 31, 2021 (view preprint)
- Accepted: February 23, 2022
- Accepted Manuscript published: March 2, 2022 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: March 8, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2022, Johnson et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 5,243
- views
-
- 721
- downloads
-
- 30
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The basolateral amygdala (BLA), a brain center of emotional expression, contributes to acoustic communication by first interpreting the meaning of social sounds in the context of the listener’s internal state, then organizing the appropriate behavioral responses. We propose that modulatory neurochemicals such as acetylcholine (ACh) and dopamine (DA) provide internal-state signals to the BLA while an animal listens to social vocalizations. We tested this in a vocal playback experiment utilizing highly affective vocal sequences associated with either mating or restraint, then sampled and analyzed fluids within the BLA for a broad range of neurochemicals and observed behavioral responses of adult male and female mice. In male mice, playback of restraint vocalizations increased ACh release and usually decreased DA release, while playback of mating sequences evoked the opposite neurochemical release patterns. In non-estrus female mice, patterns of ACh and DA release with mating playback were similar to males. Estrus females, however, showed increased ACh, associated with vigilance, as well as increased DA, associated with reward-seeking. Experimental groups that showed increased ACh release also showed the largest increases in an aversive behavior. These neurochemical release patterns and several behavioral responses depended on a single prior experience with the mating and restraint behaviors. Our results support a model in which ACh and DA provide contextual information to sound analyzing BLA neurons that modulate their output to downstream brain regions controlling behavioral responses to social vocalizations.
-
- Neuroscience
Most nervous systems combine both transmitter-mediated and direct cell-cell communication, known as 'chemical' and 'electrical' synapses, respectively. Chemical synapses can be identified by their multiple structural components. Electrical synapses are, on the other hand, generally defined by the presence of a 'gap junction' (a cluster of intercellular channels) between two neuronal processes. However, while gap junctions provide the communicating mechanism, it is unknown whether electrical transmission requires the contribution of additional cellular structures. We investigated this question at identifiable single synaptic contacts on the zebrafish Mauthner cells, at which gap junctions coexist with specializations for neurotransmitter release and where the contact unequivocally defines the anatomical limits of a synapse. Expansion microscopy of these single contacts revealed a detailed map of the incidence and spatial distribution of proteins pertaining to various synaptic structures. Multiple gap junctions of variable size were identified by the presence of their molecular components. Remarkably, most of the synaptic contact's surface was occupied by interleaving gap junctions and components of adherens junctions, suggesting a close functional association between these two structures. In contrast, glutamate receptors were confined to small peripheral portions of the contact, indicating that most of the synaptic area functions as an electrical synapse. Thus, our results revealed the overarching organization of an electrical synapse that operates with not one, but multiple gap junctions, in close association with structural and signaling molecules known to be components of adherens junctions. The relationship between these intercellular structures will aid in establishing the boundaries of electrical synapses found throughout animal connectomes and provide insight into the structural organization and functional diversity of electrical synapses.