Social selectivity and social motivation in voles

  1. Annaliese K Beery  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sarah A Lopez
  3. Katrina L Blandino
  4. Nicole S Lee
  5. Natalie S Bourdon
  1. UC Berkeley, United States
  2. Smith College, United States
  3. University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States

Abstract

Selective relationships are fundamental to humans and many other animals, but relationships between mates, family members, or peers may be mediated differently. We examined connections between social reward and social selectivity, aggression, and oxytocin receptor signaling pathways in rodents that naturally form enduring, selective relationships with mates and peers (monogamous prairie voles) or peers (group-living meadow voles). Female prairie and meadow voles worked harder to access familiar vs. unfamiliar individuals, regardless of sex, and huddled extensively with familiar subjects. Male prairie voles displayed strongly selective huddling preferences for familiar animals, but only worked harder to repeatedly access females vs. males, with no difference in effort by familiarity. This reveals a striking sex difference in pathways underlying social monogamy, and demonstrates a fundamental disconnect between motivation and social selectivity in males-a distinction not detected by the partner preference test. Meadow voles exhibited social preferences but low social motivation, consistent with tolerance rather than reward supporting social groups in this species. Natural variation in oxytocin receptor binding predicted individual variation in prosocial and aggressive behaviors. These results provide a basis for understanding species, sex, and individual differences in the mechanisms underlying the role of social reward in social preference.

Data availability

Data have been deposited in a project folder on the Open Science Framework website, available at: https://osf.io/g2jf7/

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Annaliese K Beery

    UC Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
    For correspondence
    abeery@berkeley.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1249-9182
  2. Sarah A Lopez

    Smith College, Northampton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Katrina L Blandino

    Smith College, Northampton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicole S Lee

    University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Natalie S Bourdon

    Smith College, Northampton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R15MH113085)

  • Annaliese K Beery

The funders had no role in study design, data collection or interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Brian Trainor

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Animals were handed according to a research protocol (ASAF 272) approved by the Institutional Care and use committee of Smith College.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 31, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 1, 2021
  3. Accepted: October 19, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 2, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 16, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Beery et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,610
    views
  • 286
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Annaliese K Beery
  2. Sarah A Lopez
  3. Katrina L Blandino
  4. Nicole S Lee
  5. Natalie S Bourdon
(2021)
Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
eLife 10:e72684.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72684

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72684

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Juan Jose Rodriguez Gotor, Kashif Mahfooz ... John F Wesseling
    Research Article

    Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Daniel Thiel, Luis Alfonso Yañez Guerra ... Gáspár Jékely
    Research Article

    Neuropeptides are ancient signaling molecules in animals but only few peptide receptors are known outside bilaterians. Cnidarians possess a large number of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) – the most common receptors of bilaterian neuropeptides – but most of these remain orphan with no known ligands. We searched for neuropeptides in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and created a library of 64 peptides derived from 33 precursors. In a large-scale pharmacological screen with these peptides and 161 N. vectensis GPCRs, we identified 31 receptors specifically activated by 1 to 3 of 14 peptides. Mapping GPCR and neuropeptide expression to single-cell sequencing data revealed how cnidarian tissues are extensively connected by multilayer peptidergic networks. Phylogenetic analysis identified no direct orthology to bilaterian peptidergic systems and supports the independent expansion of neuropeptide signaling in cnidarians from a few ancestral peptide-receptor pairs.