Early evolution of beetles regulated by the end-Permian deforestation

  1. Xianye Zhao
  2. Yilun Yu
  3. Matthew E Clapham
  4. Evgeny Yan
  5. Jun Chen
  6. Edmund A Jarzembowski
  7. Xiangdong Zhao
  8. Bo Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, China
  2. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, China
  3. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, United States
  4. Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation
  5. Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, China
  6. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

The end-Permian mass extinction (EPME) led to a severe terrestrial ecosystem collapse. However, the ecological response of insects—the most diverse group of organisms on Earth—to the EPME remains poorly understood. Here, we analyse beetle evolutionary history based on taxonomic diversity, morphological disparity, phylogeny, and ecological shifts from the Early Permian to Middle Triassic, using a comprehensive new data set. Permian beetles were dominated by xylophagous stem groups with high diversity and disparity, which probably played an underappreciated role in the Permian carbon cycle. Our suite of analyses shows that Permian xylophagous beetles suffered a severe extinction during the EPME largely due to the collapse of forest ecosystems, resulting in an Early Triassic gap of xylophagous beetles. New xylophagous beetles appeared widely in the early Middle Triassic, which is consistent with the restoration of forest ecosystems. Our results highlight the ecological significance of insects in deep-time terrestrial ecosystems.

Data availability

All source data are available at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7m0cfxpvd. In addition, the source data files (Supplementary Data 1-4) have been provided for figures 2-4 and appendix figures 1-10.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xianye Zhao

    Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yilun Yu

    Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matthew E Clapham

    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Evgeny Yan

    Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jun Chen

    Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Edmund A Jarzembowski

    State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjiing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xiangdong Zhao

    Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Bo Wang

    Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Nanjing, China
    For correspondence
    bowang@nigpas.ac.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8001-9937

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA19050101,XDB26000000)

  • Bo Wang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (42125201,41688103)

  • Bo Wang

Natural Scientific Founation of Shandong Province (ZR2020YQ27)

  • Jun Chen

Russian Science Foundation (21-14-00284)

  • Evgeny Yan

Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020VCA0020)

  • Edmund A Jarzembowski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Zhao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,012
    views
  • 321
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xianye Zhao
  2. Yilun Yu
  3. Matthew E Clapham
  4. Evgeny Yan
  5. Jun Chen
  6. Edmund A Jarzembowski
  7. Xiangdong Zhao
  8. Bo Wang
(2021)
Early evolution of beetles regulated by the end-Permian deforestation
eLife 10:e72692.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72692

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72692

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Ayumi Mizuno, Malgorzata Lagisz ... Shinichi Nakagawa
    Research Article

    Eyespot patterns have evolved in many prey species. These patterns were traditionally explained by the eye mimicry hypothesis, which proposes that eyespots resembling vertebrate eyes function as predator avoidance. However, it is possible that eyespots do not mimic eyes: according to the conspicuousness hypothesis, eyespots are just one form of vivid signals where only conspicuousness matters. They might work simply through neophobia or unfamiliarity, without necessarily implying aposematism or the unprofitability to potential predators. To test these hypotheses and explore factors influencing predators’ responses, we conducted a meta-analysis with 33 empirical papers that focused on bird responses to both real lepidopterans and artificial targets with conspicuous patterns (i.e. eyespots and non-eyespots). Supporting the latter hypothesis, the results showed no clear difference in predator avoidance efficacy between eyespots and non-eyespots. When comparing geometric pattern characteristics, bigger pattern sizes and smaller numbers of patterns were more effective in preventing avian predation. This finding indicates that single concentric patterns have stronger deterring effects than paired ones. Taken together, our study supports the conspicuousness hypothesis more than the eye mimicry hypothesis. Due to the number and species coverage of published studies so far, the generalisability of our conclusion may be limited. The findings highlight that pattern conspicuousness is key to eliciting avian avoidance responses, shedding a different light on this classic example of signal evolution.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Amanda D Melin
    Insight

    Studying the fecal microbiota of wild baboons helps provide new insight into the factors that influence biological aging.