Abstract

Recent studies suggest a framework where white matter (WM) atrophy plays an important role in fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) pathophysiology. However, these studies often overlook the fact that WM tracts bridging different brain regions may have different vulnerabilities to the disease and the relative contribution of GM atrophy to this WM model, resulting in a less comprehensive understanding of the relationship between clinical symptoms and pathology. Using a common factor analysis to extract a semantic and an executive factor, we aimed to test the relative contribution of WM and GM of specific tracts in predicting cognition in the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI). We found that semantic symptoms were mainly dependent on short-range WM fiber disruption, while damage to long-range WM fibers was preferentially associated to executive dysfunction with the GM contribution to cognition being predominant for local processing. These results support the importance of the disruption of specific WM tracts to the core cognitive symptoms associated with FTD. As large-scale WM tracts, which are particularly vulnerable to vascular disease, were highly associated with executive dysfunction, our findings highlight the importance of controlling for risk factors associated with deep white matter disease, such as vascular risk factors, in patients with FTD in order not to potentiate underlying executive dysfunction.

Data availability

All data were obtained from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI) and are available through the LONI portal (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). FTLDNI is a multicentric longitudinal database, collecting MRIs, PET and CSF biomarkers in FTD patients and age-matched controls.

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Howard Rosen
    (2010) FTLDNI
    http://4rtni-ftldni.ini.usc.edu/.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Melissa Savard

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Tharick A Pascoal

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stijn Servaes

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Thijs Dhollander

    Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3088-3636
  5. Yasser Iturria-Medina

    Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9345-0347
  6. Min Su Kang

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paolo Vitali

    Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Joseph Therriault

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sulantha Mathotaarachchi

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9391-4503
  10. Andrea Lessa Benedet

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Serge Gauthier

    Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Pedro Rosa-Neto

    Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    pedro.rosa@mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9116-1376

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 AG032306)

  • Pedro Rosa-Neto

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All data were obtained from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative (FTLDNI), through the LONI portal (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). FTLDNI is a multicentric longitudinal database, collecting MRIs, PET and CSF biomarkers in FTD patients and age-matched controls. The investigators at NIFD/FTLDNI contributed to the design and implementation of FTLDNI and/or provided data, but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report.

Copyright

© 2022, Savard et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 740
    views
  • 108
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Melissa Savard
  2. Tharick A Pascoal
  3. Stijn Servaes
  4. Thijs Dhollander
  5. Yasser Iturria-Medina
  6. Min Su Kang
  7. Paolo Vitali
  8. Joseph Therriault
  9. Sulantha Mathotaarachchi
  10. Andrea Lessa Benedet
  11. Serge Gauthier
  12. Pedro Rosa-Neto
(2022)
Impact of long- and short-range fiber depletion on the cognitive deficits of fronto-temporal dementia
eLife 11:e73510.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73510

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73510

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Moritz F Wurm, Doruk Yiğit Erigüç
    Research Article

    Recognizing goal-directed actions is a computationally challenging task, requiring not only the visual analysis of body movements, but also analysis of how these movements causally impact, and thereby induce a change in, those objects targeted by an action. We tested the hypothesis that the analysis of body movements and the effects they induce relies on distinct neural representations in superior and anterior inferior parietal lobe (SPL and aIPL). In four fMRI sessions, participants observed videos of actions (e.g. breaking stick, squashing plastic bottle) along with corresponding point-light-display (PLD) stick figures, pantomimes, and abstract animations of agent–object interactions (e.g. dividing or compressing a circle). Cross-decoding between actions and animations revealed that aIPL encodes abstract representations of action effect structures independent of motion and object identity. By contrast, cross-decoding between actions and PLDs revealed that SPL is disproportionally tuned to body movements independent of visible interactions with objects. Lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) was sensitive to both action effects and body movements. These results demonstrate that parietal cortex and LOTC are tuned to physical action features, such as how body parts move in space relative to each other and how body parts interact with objects to induce a change (e.g. in position or shape/configuration). The high level of abstraction revealed by cross-decoding suggests a general neural code supporting mechanical reasoning about how entities interact with, and have effects on, each other.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gyeong Hee Pyeon, Hyewon Cho ... Yong Sang Jo
    Research Article Updated

    Recent studies suggest that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) represent aversive information and signal a general alarm to the forebrain. If CGRP neurons serve as a true general alarm, their activation would modulate both passive nad active defensive behaviors depending on the magnitude and context of the threat. However, most prior research has focused on the role of CGRP neurons in passive freezing responses, with limited exploration of their involvement in active defensive behaviors. To address this, we examined the role of CGRP neurons in active defensive behavior using a predator-like robot programmed to chase mice. Our electrophysiological results revealed that CGRP neurons encode the intensity of aversive stimuli through variations in firing durations and amplitudes. Optogenetic activation of CGRP neurons during robot chasing elevated flight responses in both conditioning and retention tests, presumably by amplifying the perception of the threat as more imminent and dangerous. In contrast, animals with inactivated CGRP neurons exhibited reduced flight responses, even when the robot was programmed to appear highly threatening during conditioning. These findings expand the understanding of CGRP neurons in the PBN as a critical alarm system, capable of dynamically regulating active defensive behaviors by amplifying threat perception, and ensuring adaptive responses to varying levels of danger.