Notch controls the cell cycle to define leader versus follower identities during collective cell migration

  1. Zain Alhashem
  2. Dylan Feldner-Busztin
  3. Christopher Revell
  4. Macarena Alvarez-Garcillan Portillo
  5. Karen Camargo-Sosa
  6. Joanna Richardson
  7. Manuel Rocha
  8. Anton Gauert
  9. Tatianna Corbeaux
  10. Martina Milanetto
  11. Francesco Argenton
  12. Natascia Tiso
  13. Robert Kelsh
  14. Victoria E Prince
  15. Katie Bentley  Is a corresponding author
  16. Claudia Linker  Is a corresponding author
  1. King's College London, United Kingdom
  2. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  3. University of Bath, United Kingdom
  4. The University of Chicago, United States
  5. University of Padova, Italy
  6. University of Chicago, United States

Abstract

Coordination of cell proliferation and migration is fundamental for life, and its dysregulation has catastrophic consequences, such as cancer. How cell cycle progression affects migration, and vice-versa, remains largely unknown. We address these questions by combining in-silico modelling and in vivo experimentation in the zebrafish Trunk Neural Crest (TNC). TNC migrate collectively, forming chains with a leader cell directing the movement of trailing followers. We show that the acquisition of migratory identity is autonomously controlled by Notch signalling in TNC. High Notch activity defines leaders, while low Notch determines followers. Moreover, cell cycle progression is required for TNC migration and is regulated by Notch. Cells with low Notch activity stay longer in G1 and become followers, while leaders with high Notch activity quickly undergo G1/S transition and remain in S-phase longer. In conclusion, TNC migratory identities are defined through the interaction of Notch signalling and cell cycle progression.

Data availability

The model code is accessible at https://github.com/Bentley-Cellular-Adaptive-Behaviour-Lab/NeuralCrestCpp. The code used to perform the LDA analysis is accessible in the supplementary files. All numerical data used in the figures is accessible in the supplementary data source file.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zain Alhashem

    Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8320-3836
  2. Dylan Feldner-Busztin

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christopher Revell

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9646-2888
  4. Macarena Alvarez-Garcillan Portillo

    Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Karen Camargo-Sosa

    University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Joanna Richardson

    Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2092-3876
  7. Manuel Rocha

    The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Anton Gauert

    Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3013-5374
  9. Tatianna Corbeaux

    Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martina Milanetto

    Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Francesco Argenton

    Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0803-8236
  12. Natascia Tiso

    Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5444-9853
  13. Robert Kelsh

    University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9381-0066
  14. Victoria E Prince

    University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Katie Bentley

    The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    katie.bentley@crick.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Claudia Linker

    Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    claudia.linker@kcl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2028-6109

Funding

Medical Research Council (G1000080/1)

  • Zain Alhashem

Royal Society (2010/R1)

  • Zain Alhashem

Wellcome Trust (207630/Z/17/Z)

  • Zain Alhashem

Eucine Kennedy Shiver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institues of Health (T32HD055164)

  • Manuel Rocha

Eucine Kennedy Shiver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institues of Health (F31HD097957)

  • Manuel Rocha

Cancer Research UK (FC001751)

  • Dylan Feldner-Busztin

Medical Research Council (FC001751)

  • Dylan Feldner-Busztin

Wellcome Trust (FC001751)

  • Dylan Feldner-Busztin

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S015906/1)

  • Robert Kelsh

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Zebrafish were maintained in accordance with UK Home Office regulations UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, amended in 2013 under project license P70880F4C.

Copyright

© 2022, Alhashem et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,747
    views
  • 517
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zain Alhashem
  2. Dylan Feldner-Busztin
  3. Christopher Revell
  4. Macarena Alvarez-Garcillan Portillo
  5. Karen Camargo-Sosa
  6. Joanna Richardson
  7. Manuel Rocha
  8. Anton Gauert
  9. Tatianna Corbeaux
  10. Martina Milanetto
  11. Francesco Argenton
  12. Natascia Tiso
  13. Robert Kelsh
  14. Victoria E Prince
  15. Katie Bentley
  16. Claudia Linker
(2022)
Notch controls the cell cycle to define leader versus follower identities during collective cell migration
eLife 11:e73550.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73550

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73550

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jialin Li, Feihong Yang ... Zhuangzhi Zhang
    Short Report

    The emergence of myelinating oligodendrocytes represents a pivotal developmental milestone in vertebrates, given their capacity to ensheath axons and facilitate the swift conduction of action potentials. It is widely accepted that cortical oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) arise from medial ganglionic eminence (MGE), lateral/caudal ganglionic eminence (LGE/CGE), and cortical radial glial cells (RGCs). Here, we used two different fate mapping strategies to challenge the established notion that the LGE generates cortical OPCs. Furthermore, we used a Cre/loxP-dependent exclusion strategy to reveal that the LGE/CGE does not give rise to cortical OPCs. Additionally, we showed that specifically eliminating MGE-derived OPCs leads to a significant reduction of cortical OPCs. Together, our findings indicate that the LGE does not generate cortical OPCs, contrary to previous beliefs. These findings provide a new view of the developmental origins of cortical OPCs and a valuable foundation for future research on both normal development and oligodendrocyte-related disease.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Rula Sha, Ruochen Guo ... Ying Feng
    Research Article

    SRSF2 plays a dual role, functioning both as a transcriptional regulator and a key player in alternative splicing. The absence of Srsf2 in MyoD + progenitors resulted in perinatal mortality in mice, accompanied by severe skeletal muscle defects. SRSF2 deficiency disrupts the directional migration of MyoD progenitors, causing them to disperse into both muscle and non-muscle regions. Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis revealed significant alterations in Srsf2-deficient myoblasts, including a reduction in extracellular matrix components, diminished expression of genes involved in ameboid-type cell migration and cytoskeleton organization, mitosis irregularities, and premature differentiation. Notably, one of the targets regulated by Srsf2 is the serine/threonine kinase Aurka. Knockdown of Aurka led to reduced cell proliferation, disrupted cytoskeleton, and impaired differentiation, reflecting the effects seen with Srsf2 knockdown. Crucially, the introduction of exogenous Aurka in Srsf2-knockdown cells markedly alleviated the differentiation defects caused by Srsf2 knockdown. Furthermore, our research unveiled the role of Srsf2 in controlling alternative splicing within genes associated with human skeletal muscle diseases, such as BIN1, DMPK, FHL1, and LDB3. Specifically, the precise knockdown of the Bin1 exon17-containing variant, which is excluded following Srsf2 depletion, profoundly disrupted C2C12 cell differentiation. In summary, our study offers valuable insights into the role of SRSF2 in governing MyoD progenitors to specific muscle regions, thereby controlling their differentiation through the regulation of targeted genes and alternative splicing during skeletal muscle development.