microRNA-138 controls hippocampal interneuron function and short-term memory in mice

Abstract

The proper development and function of neuronal circuits relies on a tightly regulated balance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) synaptic transmission, and disrupting this balance can cause neurodevelopmental disorders, e.g. schizophrenia. microRNA-dependent gene regulation in pyramidal neurons is important for excitatory synaptic function and cognition, but its role in inhibitory interneurons is poorly understood. Here, we identify miR138-5p as a regulator of short-term memory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus. Sponge-mediated miR138-5p inactivation specifically in mouse parvalbumin (PV)-expressing interneurons impairs spatial recognition memory and enhances GABAergic synaptic input onto pyramidal neurons. Cellular and behavioural phenotypes associated with miR138-5p inactivation are paralleled by an upregulation of the schizophrenia-associated Erbb4, which we validated as a direct miR138-5p target gene. Our findings suggest that miR138-5p is a critical regulator of PV interneuron function in mice, with implications for cognition and schizophrenia. More generally, they provide evidence that microRNAs orchestrate neural circuit development by fine-tuning both excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission.

Data availability

RNA-seq data has been deposited to GEO (accession no. GSE173982

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Reetu Daswani

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Carlotta Gilardi

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael Soutschek

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8472-8124
  4. Pakruti Nanda

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kerstin Weiss

    Institute for Physiological Chemistry, Philipp University of Marburg, Marberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Silvia Bicker

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6276-5653
  7. Roberto Fiore

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christoph Dieterich

    Department of Internal Medicine III, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9468-6311
  9. Pierre-Luc Germain

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3418-4218
  10. Jochen Winterer

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    jochen.winterer@hest.ethz.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6800-6594
  11. Gerhard Schratt

    Department of Health Science and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    gerhard.schratt@hest.ethz.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7527-2025

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHR 1136/4-2)

  • Gerhard Schratt

Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (24 18-2 (NeuroSno))

  • Gerhard Schratt

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John R Huguenard, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were conducted in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the relevant local or national rules and regulations of Switzerland and were subject to prior authorization by the local cantonal authorities (ZH017/2018, ZH196/17).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: May 13, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 20, 2021
  3. Accepted: March 13, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 15, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: March 29, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Daswani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,325
    views
  • 224
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Reetu Daswani
  2. Carlotta Gilardi
  3. Michael Soutschek
  4. Pakruti Nanda
  5. Kerstin Weiss
  6. Silvia Bicker
  7. Roberto Fiore
  8. Christoph Dieterich
  9. Pierre-Luc Germain
  10. Jochen Winterer
  11. Gerhard Schratt
(2022)
microRNA-138 controls hippocampal interneuron function and short-term memory in mice
eLife 11:e74056.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74056

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74056

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Alyssa D Huff, Marlusa Karlen-Amarante ... Jan-Marino Ramirez
    Research Advance

    Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder that results in multiple bouts of intermittent hypoxia. OSA has many neurological and systemic comorbidities, including dysphagia, or disordered swallow, and discoordination with breathing. However, the mechanism in which chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) causes dysphagia is unknown. Recently, we showed the postinspiratory complex (PiCo) acts as an interface between the swallow pattern generator (SPG) and the inspiratory rhythm generator, the preBötzinger complex, to regulate proper swallow-breathing coordination (Huff et al., 2023). PiCo is characterized by interneurons co-expressing transporters for glutamate (Vglut2) and acetylcholine (ChAT). Here we show that optogenetic stimulation of ChATcre:Ai32, Vglut2cre:Ai32, and ChATcre:Vglut2FlpO:ChR2 mice exposed to CIH does not alter swallow-breathing coordination, but unexpectedly disrupts swallow behavior via triggering variable swallow motor patterns. This suggests that glutamatergic–cholinergic neurons in PiCo are not only critical for the regulation of swallow-breathing coordination, but also play an important role in the modulation of swallow motor patterning. Our study also suggests that swallow disruption, as seen in OSA, involves central nervous mechanisms interfering with swallow motor patterning and laryngeal activation. These findings are crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying dysphagia, both in OSA and other breathing and neurological disorders.

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.