A transcriptional constraint mechanism limits the homeostatic response to activity deprivation in mammalian neocortex

Abstract

Healthy neuronal networks rely on homeostatic plasticity to maintain stable firing rates despite changing synaptic drive. These mechanisms, however, can themselves be destabilizing if activated inappropriately or excessively. For example, prolonged activity deprivation can lead to rebound hyperactivity and seizures. While many forms of homeostasis have been described, whether and how the magnitude of homeostatic plasticity is constrained remains unknown. Here we uncover negative regulation of cortical network homeostasis by the PARbZIP family of transcription factors. In cortical slice cultures made from knockout mice lacking all three of these factors, the network response to prolonged activity withdrawal measured with calcium imaging is much stronger, while baseline activity is unchanged. Whole cell recordings reveal an exaggerated increase in the frequency of miniature excitatory synaptic currents reflecting enhanced upregulation of recurrent excitatory synaptic transmission. Genetic analyses reveal that two of the factors, Hlf and Tef, are critical for constraining plasticity and for preventing life-threatening seizures. These data indicate that transcriptional activation is not only required for many forms of homeostatic plasticity but is also involved in restraint of the response to activity deprivation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files, calcium imaging analysis code is available http://github.com/VH-Lab/vhlab-TwoPhoton-matlab. RNAseq data have been deposited to the BioSample database.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vera Valakh

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7149-1562
  2. Derek Wise

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Xiaoyue Aelita Zhu

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mingqi Sha

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jaidyn Fok

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Stephen D Van Hooser

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1112-5832
  7. Robin Schectman

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Isabel Cepeda

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Ryan Kirk

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Sean M O'Toole

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Sacha B Nelson

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    nelson@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    Sacha B Nelson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0108-8599

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS109916)

  • Sacha B Nelson

Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (648651)

  • Sacha B Nelson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Yukiko Goda, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Japan

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Brandeis University (Protocol #20002), and conformed to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Version history

  1. Received: October 20, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: October 21, 2021 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: February 3, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: February 7, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: March 13, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Valakh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,326
    views
  • 160
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vera Valakh
  2. Derek Wise
  3. Xiaoyue Aelita Zhu
  4. Mingqi Sha
  5. Jaidyn Fok
  6. Stephen D Van Hooser
  7. Robin Schectman
  8. Isabel Cepeda
  9. Ryan Kirk
  10. Sean M O'Toole
  11. Sacha B Nelson
(2023)
A transcriptional constraint mechanism limits the homeostatic response to activity deprivation in mammalian neocortex
eLife 12:e74899.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74899

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74899

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aedan Yue Li, Natalia Ladyka-Wojcik ... Morgan Barense
    Research Article

    Combining information from multiple senses is essential to object recognition, core to the ability to learn concepts, make new inferences, and generalize across distinct entities. Yet how the mind combines sensory input into coherent crossmodal representations - the crossmodal binding problem - remains poorly understood. Here, we applied multi-echo fMRI across a four-day paradigm, in which participants learned 3-dimensional crossmodal representations created from well-characterized unimodal visual shape and sound features. Our novel paradigm decoupled the learned crossmodal object representations from their baseline unimodal shapes and sounds, thus allowing us to track the emergence of crossmodal object representations as they were learned by healthy adults. Critically, we found that two anterior temporal lobe structures - temporal pole and perirhinal cortex - differentiated learned from non-learned crossmodal objects, even when controlling for the unimodal features that composed those objects. These results provide evidence for integrated crossmodal object representations in the anterior temporal lobes that were different from the representations for the unimodal features. Furthermore, we found that perirhinal cortex representations were by default biased towards visual shape, but this initial visual bias was attenuated by crossmodal learning. Thus, crossmodal learning transformed perirhinal representations such that they were no longer predominantly grounded in the visual modality, which may be a mechanism by which object concepts gain their abstraction.