NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex mediates chronic social defeat stress-induced anhedonia-like behavior and reductions in excitatory synapses

  1. Brandon W Hughes
  2. Benjamin M Siemsen
  3. Evgeny Tsvetkov
  4. Stefano Berto
  5. Jaswinder Kumar
  6. Rebecca G Cornbrooks
  7. Rose Marie Akiki
  8. Jennifer Y Cho
  9. Jordan S Carter
  10. Kirsten K Snyder
  11. Ahlem Assali
  12. Michael D Scofield
  13. Christopher W Cowan  Is a corresponding author
  14. Makoto Taniguchi  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, United States
  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Medical University of South Carolina, United States
  3. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, United States
  4. Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
6 figures, 1 table and 3 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Social defeat stress induces NPAS4 expression in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC).

(A, B) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot of the mPFC single cells colored by cell type (A) and Npsa4 mRNA expression (B). Cell types were defined by known markers and confirmed by predictive modeling using a single-cell mPFC atlas. (C) Donut chart represents the percentage of cell types that express Npas4 mRNA. (D) Dot plot represents the percentage of Npas4 mRNA expressing neurons in each cell type. (E) Schematic illustration of experimental timeline of gene expression analyses following acute social defeat stress and 10 days of chronic social defeat stress (CSDS). (F) Data plot represents the quantification of Npas4 mRNA expression following acute and chronic social defeat stress at 5 min, 15 min, 1 hr, and 24 hr (n = 5–10/condition). (G) Quantification of fold change in NPAS4-positive cell number following acute and chronic social defeat stress in subregions of the mPFC, including the anterior cingulate, prelimbic, and infralimbic cortices (n = 3–5/condition). (H) Quantification of mPFC NPAS4-positive cells relative to the number of CaMKIIα-positive cells in control/no-stress mice. (I, J) Data plot shows the percentage of CaMKIIα-, somatostatin (SST)-, and parvalbumin (PV)-positive cells in NPAS4-positive cells within the mPFC after acute stress and CSDS (n = 3–9/condition), as well as representative IHC images of NPAS4 colocalization in these respective cell type. Scale bar, 10 μm. Data shown are mean ± SEM; *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001. Also see Source data 1 for detailed statistical analyses.

Figure 1—source data 1

Figure 1F.

Npas4 mRNA expression in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 2

Figure 1G.

Number of NPAS4(+) cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-data2-v1.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 3

Figure 1H.

Number of NPAS4(+) cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the CaMKIIα-positive or -negative cells after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-data3-v1.xlsx
Figure 1—source data 4

Figure 1I.

% of cellular marker expression in the NPAS4(+) cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-data4-v1.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Social defeat stress induces NPAS4 and cFos expression in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC).

(A) Quantification of Npas4 mRNA expression in the NAc following acute and chronic social defeat stress at 15 min, 1 hr, and 24 hr (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc analysis: control vs. acute stress at 15 min, p<0.0001, control vs. chronic stress at 15 min, p<0.0001, n = 5–10 per group). (B) Quantification of cFos mRNA expression in the mPFC following acute and chronic social defeat stress at 15 min, 1 hr, and 24 hr (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc analysis: control vs. acute stress at 15 min, p<0.0001, control vs. chronic stress at 15 min, p<0.0001, acute vs. chronic stress at 15 min, p=0.0021, control vs. acute stress at 1 hr, p<0.0001, control vs. chronic stress at 1 hr, p<0.0001, acute vs. chronic stress at 1 hr, p=0.0055, n = 5–10 per group). (C) Data plot represents fold change of NPAS4 signal intensity in CaMKIIα-positive pyramidal excitatory neurons of the mPFC (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc analysis: control vs. acute stress, p=0.0002, control vs. chronic stress, p=0.8222, acute vs. chronic stress, p=0.0001, n = 45–87 cells/3–5 animals/condition). Data shown are mean ± SEM; **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Also see Source data 1 for detailed for detailed statistical analyses.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Figure 1—figure supplement 1A.

Npas4 mRNA expression in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-figsupp1-data1-v1.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2

Figure 1—figure supplement 1B.

cFos mRNA expression in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-figsupp1-data2-v1.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 3

Figure 1—figure supplement 1C.

NPAS4 signal intensity in the CaMKIIα-positive cells after acute and chronic social defeat stress.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig1-figsupp1-data3-v1.xlsx
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is required for chronic social defeat stress (CSDS)-induced anhedonia-like behavior.

(A) Schematic illustration of experimental timeline of behavioral test battery consisting of CSDS followed by social interaction (SI; C–F), sucrose preference (SP; G), elevated plus maze (EPM; H), sucrose self-administration, and progressive ratio testing (Suc-SA and PR; Figure 3A–D). (B) AAV2-Npas4 shRNA in the adult male mPFC decreases stress-induced NPAS4 protein expression. Left: representative image showing AAV2-shRNA expression viral vector-mediated eGFP expression in the adult mice mPFC. Right: quantification of NPAS4-positive cells/100 μm2 (n = 4/condition). (C) and (D) CSDS decreases the time spent in the social interaction zone (C) and the social interaction ratio (D) in SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice after CSDS (n = 18–25/condition). (E) and (F) CSDS increases the time spent in the avoidance corner zone and social avoidance ratio in SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice (n = 16–24/condition). (G) CSDS-induced reduction of sucrose preference is blocked by Npas4 shRNA in the mPFC (F; n = 11–24). (H) CSDS reduces time spent in open arms (sec) in SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice (n =14–18).

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is required for chronic social defeat stress (CSDS)-induced reduction of sucrose consumption.

Chart represents the amount of consumption of water and 1% sucrose solution in each day SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice after CSDS (two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc analysis: control vs. CSDS in SC shRNAPFC mice, p=0.0624, SC shRNA versus Npas4 shRNA animals with CSDS, p=0.0504, n = 11–24 per group). Data shown are mean ± SEM; Also see Source data 1 for detailed statistical analyses.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Amount of liquid consumption (mL) in the sucrose preference assay.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig2-figsupp1-data1-v1.xlsx
NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) regulates effort-based motivated behavior during sucrose SA following chronic social defeat stress (CSDS).

(A, B) Data plots showing the acquisition period of sucrose self-administration in SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice after CSDS or no stress control condition, with no change in the number of sucrose delivery (A) and in the discrimination ratio between the active and inactive nosepokes (B; n = 14–18/group). (C) Data plot showing the maximum number of active nose pokes required to receive a sucrose reward (breakpoint) after CSDS in the PR test of both SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice. Npas4 shRNAPFC mice demonstrated a significantly higher PR breakpoint compared to control SC shRNAPFC mice (n = 13–19/group). (D) Npas4 shRNAPFC mice susceptible, but not resilience, to CSDS demonstrated a significantly higher breakpoint compared to SC shRNAPFC mice after CSDS (n =3–14/group).

Figure 3—source data 1

Figure 3A.

Sucrose delivery in the sucrose self-administration.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 2

Figure 3B.

Discrimination index in the sucrose self-administration.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig3-data2-v1.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 3

Figure 3C.

Breakpoint in the sucrose self-administration.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig3-data3-v1.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 4

Figure 3D.

Breakpoint of animals after chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) in the sucrose self-administration.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/75631/elife-75631-fig3-data4-v1.xlsx
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
NPAS4 regulates chronic social defeat stress (CSDS)-induced reductions in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) dendritic spine density and excitatory synaptic transmission.

(A, B) NPAS4 regulates CSDS-induced reduction of dendritic spine density in the mPFC. (A) Representative images showing AAV2-shRNA expression viral vector-mediated eGFP expression. Scale bar, 3 μm. (B) Quantification of dendritic spine density of deep layer mPFC pyramidal neurons from SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice after CSDS or in no stress controls (n = 34–55 branch/8 animals/condition). (C) Inter-event interval after Npas4 knockdown and CSDS. (D) Cumulative probability of inter-event interval after CSDS after SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC. (E) Miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) amplitude after Npas4 knockdown and CSDS. (F) Cumulative probability of mEPSCC amplitude after CSDS after SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC. (G) Representative mEPSC traces. (H) Paired-pulse ratio recordings after Npas4 knockdown and CSDS. Data shown are mean ± SEM; *p<0.05, ***p<0.001. Also see Source data 1 for detailed statistical analyses.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) dendritic spine morphological analyses in the mPFC of SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice after chronic social defeat stress (CSDS).

Data plots represent spine head diameter of AAV2-SC shRNA or Npas4 shRNA viral vector-mediated eGFP-positive mPFC pyramidal neurons after CSDS (two-way ANOVA, n =34–55 branch/8 animals/condition).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement
NPAS4 regulates the expression of ribosomal and glutamatergic synapse genes.

(A, B) List of top differentially expressed genes in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of Npas4 shRNAPFC mice (A) and corresponding volcano plot of all significant DEGs (FDR < 0.05, log2 (FC) > |0.3|, red) compared to those that were not significant (gray; B). (C) Npas4 DEG enrichment in gene modules that are deferentially regulated in Resilience and Susceptible animals in Bagot et al., 2016 and are dysregulated in neuropsychiatric disorders; Modules M1 and M15, as shown by PsychENCODE. (D) Gene ontology analysis of down- and upregulated DEGs in Npas4 shRNAPFC mice. (E) Comparison of mPFC genes regulated by Npas4 shRNAPFC compared to previously published Npas4 ChIP-seq data (Kim et al., 2010; Brigidi et al., 2019). (F) Overlap of significantly differential expression genes (p<0.05) in Npas4 shRNAPFC mice (left; blue) and differential expression genes (p<0.05) in BA8/9 of human major depressive disorder (MDD) patients (right; pink). (G) ChIP-seq analysis of NPAS4 association with significant ribosome-related differential expression genes identified from this study.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Differential expression genes in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of Npas4 shRNA mice.

Data plots represent the relative mRNA expression in the mPFC of SC shRNA and Npas4 shRNA mice (two-way ANOVA, Npas4, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, Tukey’s post hoc analysis, SC shRNAPFC and Npas4 shRNAPFC mice with acute social defeat stress [SDS], p=0.0005, Ache, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, p=0.0002, Arpp21, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, p=0.118, Dhcr7, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, p=0.0042, Hps4, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, p=0.0121, Nfix, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, p=0.0171, Sst, main effect of Npas4 shRNA, p=0.0281 [n = 7 per group]). Data shown are mean ± SEM; *p<0.05, **p<0.01. Also see Source data 1 for detailed statistical analyses.

Summary for NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates chronic social defeat stress (CSDS)-induced anhedonia-like behavior and reductions in excitatory synapses.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Transfected construct (Mus musculus)AAV2-Anti-Npas4 shRNATaniguchi et al., 2017, obtained from UNC vector Core and USC vector Core
Transfected construct (M. musculus)AAV2-Scramble shRNATaniguchi et al., 2017, obtained from UNC vector Core and USC vector Core
Biological sample (M. musculus)C57Bl6J miceThe Jackson laboratoryStrain# 000664; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664
AntibodyAnti-CaMKIIalpha (mouse monoclonal)Enzo Life SciencesCat# KAM-CA002D; RRID:AB_1659580IF(1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-somatostatin (rat monoclonal)MilliporeCat# MAB354;
RRID:AB_2255365
IF(1:1000)
AntibodyAnti- parvalbumin (mouse monoclonal)AvesCat# MAB1572; RRID: AB_2174013IF(1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-GFP (chicken polyclonal)AvesCat# GFP-1020; RRID: AB_10000240IF(1:1000)
AntibodyAnti-Npas4 (rabbit polyclonal)Lin et al., 2008IF(1:1000–2000)
Sequence-based reagentScramble shRNALin et al., 2008GGTTCAGCGTCATAATT
TATTCAAGAGATAAATTA
TGACGCTGAACC
Sequence-based reagentNpas4 shRNALin et al., 2008GGTTGACCCTGATAATT
TATTCAAGAGATAAATTA
TCAGGGTCAACC
Sequence-based reagentNpas4 forward primerFurukawa-Hibi et al., 2012PCR primersAGCATTCCAGGCT
CATCTGAA
Sequence-based reagentNpas4 reverse primerFurukawa-Hibi et al., 2012PCR primersGGCGAAGTAAGT
CTTGGTAGGATT
Sequence-based reagentNpas4 forward primerLin et al., 2008PCR primersGCTATA CTCAGAAGG
TCCAGAAGGC
Sequence-based reagentNpas4 reverse primerLin et al., 2008PCR primersTCAGAGAATGAG
GGTAGCACAGC
Sequence-based reagentGapdh forward primerKrishnan et al., 2007PCR primersAGGTCGGTGTG
AACGGATTTG
Sequence-based reagentGapdh reverse primerKrishnan et al., 2007PCR primersTGTAGACCATGT
AGTTGAGGTCA
Sequence-based reagentβ-tubulin forward primerLin et al., 2008PCR primersCGAC AATGAAG
CCCTCTACGAC
Sequence-based reagentβ-tubulin reverse primerLin et al., 2008PCR primersATGGTGGCAGAC
ACAAGGTGGTTG
Sequence-based reagentcFos forward primerWatanabe et al., 2009PCR primersGTCGACCTAGGG
AGGACCTTAC
Sequence-based reagentcFos reverse primerWatanabe et al., 2009PCR primersCATCTCTGGAAG
AGGTGAGGAC
Sequence-based reagentNfix forward primerMGH, Harvard Medical School, Primer BankPCR primersAGCCCCAGCTA
CTACAACATA
Sequence-based reagentNfix reverse primerMGH, Harvard Medical School, Primer BankPCR primersAGTCCAGCTTT
CCTGACTTCT
Sequence-based reagentSst forward primerMGH, Harvard Medical School, Primer BankPCR primersACCGGGAAAC
AGGAACTGG
Sequence-based reagentSst reverse primerMGH, Harvard Medical School, Primer BankPCR primersTTGCTGGGTT
CGAGTTGGC
Sequence-based reagentDhcr7 forward primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP200098CAAGACACCAC
CTGTGACAGCT
Sequence-based reagentDhcr7 reverse primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP200098CTGCTGGAGTAA
TGGCACCTTC
Sequence-based reagentArpp21 forward primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP221281GGAGTCAGCAAA
TACCACAGACC
Sequence-based reagentArpp21 reverse primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat#: MP221281CTCCTTGCTGA
CTGCTCATCAC
Sequence-based reagentHps4 forward primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP206052AGTGTGAACGGA
CTGGTGCTGT
Sequence-based reagentHps4 reverse primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP206052GTCTCCTTCAGG
TGGACTTCCA
Sequence-based reagentAche forward primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP200188TTCCTTCGTGCC
TGTGGTAGAC
Sequence-based reagentAche reverse primerORIGENEPCR primers, Cat# MP200188CCGTAAACCAGAA
AGTAGGAGCC
Software, algorithmHOMERHeinz et al., 2010
Software, algorithmSTARDobin et al., 2013
Software, algorithmHTseqAnders et al., 2015
Software, algorithmbiomaRtDurinck et al., 2009
Software, algorithmGOstatsFalcon and Gentleman, 2007
OtherSingle-nuclei RNA-seq with mPFC from control C57BL/6J miceThis paperGSE165586snRNA-seq analysis data
assocciated with
Figure 1A-D.
OtherRNA-seq with mPFC from AAV-Npas4 mRNA shRNA miceThis paperGSE165586RNA-seq analysis data
associated with
Figure 5.
OtherChIP-Seq, NPAS4Brigidi et al., 2019GSE127793ChIP-seq analysis data
associated with
Figure 5E.
OtherChIP-Seq, NPAS4Kim et al., 2010GSE21161ChIP-seq analysis data
associated with
Figure 5E.

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brandon W Hughes
  2. Benjamin M Siemsen
  3. Evgeny Tsvetkov
  4. Stefano Berto
  5. Jaswinder Kumar
  6. Rebecca G Cornbrooks
  7. Rose Marie Akiki
  8. Jennifer Y Cho
  9. Jordan S Carter
  10. Kirsten K Snyder
  11. Ahlem Assali
  12. Michael D Scofield
  13. Christopher W Cowan
  14. Makoto Taniguchi
(2023)
NPAS4 in the medial prefrontal cortex mediates chronic social defeat stress-induced anhedonia-like behavior and reductions in excitatory synapses
eLife 12:e75631.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75631