Shared mechanisms of auditory and non-auditory vocal learning in the songbird brain
Abstract
Songbirds and humans share the ability to adaptively modify their vocalizations based on sensory feedback. Prior studies have focused primarily on the role that auditory feedback plays in shaping vocal output throughout life. In contrast, it is unclear how non-auditory information drives vocal plasticity. Here, we first used a reinforcement learning paradigm to establish that somatosensory feedback (cutaneous electrical stimulation) can drive vocal learning in adult songbirds. We then assessed the role of a songbird basal ganglia thalamocortical pathway critical to auditory vocal learning in this novel form of vocal plasticity. We found that both this circuit and its dopaminergic inputs are necessary for non-auditory vocal learning, demonstrating that this pathway is critical for guiding adaptive vocal changes based on both auditory and somatosensory signals. The ability of this circuit to use both auditory and somatosensory information to guide vocal learning may reflect a general principle for the neural systems that support vocal plasticity across species.
Data availability
Source data are provided for all main figures and relevant figure supplements (Figure 2b-f, Figure 2 - Figure Supplements 1-7, Figure 3b-e, Figure 3 - Figure Supplement 1, and Figure 4b-d). MATLAB code for generating these figures is also provided in the associated source code files. Data and source code have also been uploaded to a public data repository on figshare, in a project titled 'Shared mechanisms of auditory and non-auditory vocal learning in the songbird brain.'
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_4_Source_data_3.mat. figshare. Dataset.Figshare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183351.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_4_Source_data_1.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183354.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_Code_3.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183357.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_4_Source_Code_2.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183360.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_data_1.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183348.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_4_Source_Code_3.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183339.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_4_Source_data_2.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183342.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_data_3.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183345.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_Code_2.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183327.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_data_2.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183330.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_data_2.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183333.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_Code_4.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183336.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_data_1.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183318.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_data_3.mat. figshare. Dataset.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183321.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_4_Source_Code_1.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183324.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_code_3.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183315.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_code_4.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183303.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_Code_1.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183306.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_2_Source_Code_2.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183309.v1.
-
McGregor_et_al_Figure_3_Source_Code_1.m. figshare. Software.FigShare, 10.6084/m9.figshare.20183312.v1.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (R01- EB022872)
- James N McGregor
- Abigail L Grassler
- Amanda Louise Jacob
- Samuel J Sober
National Institutes of Health (R01- NS084844)
- James N McGregor
- Abigail L Grassler
- Amanda Louise Jacob
- Samuel J Sober
National Institutes of Health (R01- NS099375)
- James N McGregor
- Abigail L Grassler
- Amanda Louise Jacob
- Samuel J Sober
Simons Foundation (Emory International Consortium on Motor Control)
- Samuel J Sober
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Paul I Jaffe
- Michael S Brainard
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All experimental protocols were approved by the Emory University and UC San Francisco Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (protocol #201700359)
Copyright
© 2022, McGregor et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,436
- views
-
- 513
- downloads
-
- 16
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Medicine
- Neuroscience
C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonists may improve both acute stroke outcome and long-term recovery. Despite their evaluation in ongoing clinical trials, gaps remain in the evidence supporting their use. With a panel of patients with lived experiences of stroke, we performed a systematic review of animal models of stroke that administered a CCR5 antagonist and assessed infarct size or behavioural outcomes. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were searched. Article screening and data extraction were completed in duplicate. We pooled outcomes using random effects meta-analyses. We assessed risk of bias using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool and alignment with the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) and Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR) recommendations. Five studies representing 10 experiments were included. CCR5 antagonists reduced infarct volume (standard mean difference −1.02; 95% confidence interval −1.58 to −0.46) when compared to stroke-only controls. Varied timing of CCR5 administration (pre- or post-stroke induction) produced similar benefit. CCR5 antagonists significantly improved 11 of 16 behavioural outcomes reported. High risk of bias was present in all studies and critical knowledge gaps in the preclinical evidence were identified using STAIR/SRRR. CCR5 antagonists demonstrate promise; however, rigorously designed preclinical studies that better align with STAIR/SRRR recommendations and downstream clinical trials are warranted. Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023393438).
-
- Neuroscience
The increasing use of tissue clearing techniques underscores the urgent need for cost-effective and simplified deep imaging methods. While traditional inverted confocal microscopes excel in high-resolution imaging of tissue sections and cultured cells, they face limitations in deep imaging of cleared tissues due to refractive index mismatches between the immersion media of objectives and sample container. To overcome these challenges, the RIM-Deep was developed to significantly improve deep imaging capabilities without compromising the normal function of the confocal microscope. This system facilitates deep immunofluorescence imaging of the prefrontal cortex in cleared macaque tissue, extending imaging depth from 2 mm to 5 mm. Applied to an intact and cleared Thy1-EGFP mouse brain, the system allowed for clear axonal visualization at high imaging depth. Moreover, this advancement enables large-scale, deep 3D imaging of intact tissues. In principle, this concept can be extended to any imaging modality, including existing inverted wide-field, confocal, and two-photon microscopy. This would significantly upgrade traditional laboratory configurations and facilitate the study of connectomes in the brain and other tissues.