Adaptation of Drosophila larva foraging in response to changes in food resources

  1. Marina E Wosniack
  2. Dylan Festa
  3. Nan Hu
  4. Julijana Gjorgjieva  Is a corresponding author
  5. Jimena Berni  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany
  2. Technical University of Munich, Germany
  3. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  4. University of Sussex, United Kingdom

Abstract

All animals face the challenge of finding nutritious resources in a changing environment. To maximize life-time fitness, the exploratory behavior has to be flexible, but which behavioral elements adapt and what triggers those changes remain elusive. Using experiments and modeling, we characterized extensively how Drosophila larvae foraging adapts to different food quality and distribution and how the foraging genetic background influences this adaptation. Our work shows that different food properties modulated specific motor programs. Food quality controls the travelled distance by modulating crawling speed and frequency of pauses and turns. Food distribution, and in particular the food-no food interphase, controls turning behavior, stimulating turns towards the food when reaching the patch border and increasing the proportion of time spent within patches of food. Finally, the polymorphism in the foraging gene (rover-sitter) of the larvae adjusts the magnitude of the behavioral response to different food conditions. This study defines several levels of control of foraging and provides the basis for the systematic identification of the neuronal circuits and mechanisms controlling each behavioral response.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files 1 and 2; Source Data files have been provided formal experimental data: Figures 1, 3, 4 and 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marina E Wosniack

    Computation in Neural Circuits Group, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2175-9713
  2. Dylan Festa

    School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nan Hu

    Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Julijana Gjorgjieva

    Computation in Neural Circuits Group, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    gjorgjieva@brain.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7118-4079
  5. Jimena Berni

    Brighton and Sussex Medical School,, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    j.berni@sussex.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5068-1372

Funding

Royal Society (105568/Z/14/Z)

  • Jimena Berni

Wellcome Trust (105568/Z/14/Z)

  • Jimena Berni

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Marina E Wosniack
  • Julijana Gjorgjieva

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Marina E Wosniack

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Matthieu Louis, University of California, Santa Barbara, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: June 21, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: November 24, 2021
  3. Accepted: November 29, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 2, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 6, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Wosniack et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,541
    views
  • 228
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marina E Wosniack
  2. Dylan Festa
  3. Nan Hu
  4. Julijana Gjorgjieva
  5. Jimena Berni
(2022)
Adaptation of Drosophila larva foraging in response to changes in food resources
eLife 11:e75826.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75826

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75826

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Daniel Hoops, Robert Kyne ... Cecilia Flores
    Short Report

    Dopamine axons are the only axons known to grow during adolescence. Here, using rodent models, we examined how two proteins, Netrin-1 and its receptor, UNC5C, guide dopamine axons toward the prefrontal cortex and shape behaviour. We demonstrate in mice (Mus musculus) that dopamine axons reach the cortex through a transient gradient of Netrin-1-expressing cells – disrupting this gradient reroutes axons away from their target. Using a seasonal model (Siberian hamsters; Phodopus sungorus) we find that mesocortical dopamine development can be regulated by a natural environmental cue (daylength) in a sexually dimorphic manner – delayed in males, but advanced in females. The timings of dopamine axon growth and UNC5C expression are always phase-locked. Adolescence is an ill-defined, transitional period; we pinpoint neurodevelopmental markers underlying this period.

    1. Neuroscience
    Baba Yogesh, Georg B Keller
    Research Article

    Acetylcholine is released in visual cortex by axonal projections from the basal forebrain. The signals conveyed by these projections and their computational significance are still unclear. Using two-photon calcium imaging in behaving mice, we show that basal forebrain cholinergic axons in the mouse visual cortex provide a binary locomotion state signal. In these axons, we found no evidence of responses to visual stimuli or visuomotor prediction errors. While optogenetic activation of cholinergic axons in visual cortex in isolation did not drive local neuronal activity, when paired with visuomotor stimuli, it resulted in layer-specific increases of neuronal activity. Responses in layer 5 neurons to both top-down and bottom-up inputs were increased in amplitude and decreased in latency, whereas those in layer 2/3 neurons remained unchanged. Using opto- and chemogenetic manipulations of cholinergic activity, we found acetylcholine to underlie the locomotion-associated decorrelation of activity between neurons in both layer 2/3 and layer 5. Our results suggest that acetylcholine augments the responsiveness of layer 5 neurons to inputs from outside of the local network, possibly enabling faster switching between internal representations during locomotion.