Single-cell transcriptome reveals insights into the development and function of the zebrafish ovary

Abstract

Zebrafish are an established research organism that has made many contributions to our understanding of vertebrate tissue and organ development, yet there are still significant gaps in our understanding of the genes that regulate gonad development, sex, and reproduction. Unlike the development of many organs, such as the brain and heart that form during the first few days of development, zebrafish gonads do not begin to form until the larval stage (≥5 dpf). Thus, forward genetic screens have identified very few genes required for gonad development. In addition, bulk RNA sequencing studies which identify genes expressed in the gonads do not have the resolution necessary to define minor cell populations that may play significant roles in development and function of these organs. To overcome these limitations, we have used single-cell RNA sequencing to determine the transcriptomes of cells isolated from juvenile zebrafish ovaries. This resulted in the profiles of 10,658 germ cells and 14,431 somatic cells. Our germ cell data represents all developmental stages from germline stem cells to early meiotic oocytes. Our somatic cell data represents all known somatic cell types, including follicle cells, theca cells and ovarian stromal cells. Further analysis revealed an unexpected number of cell subpopulations within these broadly defined cell types. To further define their functional significance, we determined the location of these cell subpopulations within the ovary. Finally, we used gene knockout experiments to determine the roles of foxl2l and wnt9b for oocyte development and sex determination and/or differentiation, respectively. Our results reveal novel insights into zebrafish ovarian development and function and the transcriptome profiles will provide a valuable resource for future studies.

Data availability

The raw and processed data reported in this paper are archived at NCBI GEO https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE191137) and in an interactively browsable forms at the Broad Institute Single-Cell Portal (https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell/study/SCP928/40dpf-ovary-all-cells). Analysis code and objects are archived at github (https://github.com/yulongliu68/zeb_ov_ssRNAseq). Gene expression tables for the cell clusters identified are archived at Dryad: (https://datadryad.org/stash/share/CEd0Zs4oZKdinTWeJPKbWYjBq6hYq4QhVacQcFjf37E).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yulong Liu

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michelle E Kassack

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Matthew E McFaul

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lana N Christensen

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Stefan Siebert

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sydney R Wyatt

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Caramai N Kamei

    Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Samuel Horst

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nayeli Arroyo

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Iain A Drummond

    Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Celina E Juliano

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4222-0987
  12. Bruce W Draper

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    For correspondence
    bwdraper@ucdavis.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4397-7749

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 HD-081551)

  • Yulong Liu
  • Matthew E McFaul
  • Lana N Christensen
  • Bruce W Draper

National Science Foundation (IOS-1456737)

  • Michelle E Kassack
  • Lana N Christensen
  • Bruce W Draper

National Institutes of Health (T32 training grant ES-0070599)

  • Michelle E Kassack

National Institutes of Health (T32 training grant GM-007377)

  • Matthew E McFaul
  • Sydney R Wyatt

National Science Foundation (GRFP 2036201)

  • Sydney R Wyatt

National Institutes of Health (R35 GM133689)

  • Stefan Siebert
  • Celina E Juliano

National Institutes of Health (R01 DK126021)

  • Iain A Drummond

National Institutes of Health (R01)

  • Caramai N Kamei
  • Iain A Drummond

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John Postlethwait

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#20200 and #20201) of the University of California, Davis.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 1, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 1, 2021
  3. Accepted: May 18, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: May 19, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 13, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,194
    views
  • 973
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yulong Liu
  2. Michelle E Kassack
  3. Matthew E McFaul
  4. Lana N Christensen
  5. Stefan Siebert
  6. Sydney R Wyatt
  7. Caramai N Kamei
  8. Samuel Horst
  9. Nayeli Arroyo
  10. Iain A Drummond
  11. Celina E Juliano
  12. Bruce W Draper
(2022)
Single-cell transcriptome reveals insights into the development and function of the zebrafish ovary
eLife 11:e76014.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76014

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76014

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Nikola Sekulovski, Jenna C Wettstein ... Kenichiro Taniguchi
    Research Article

    Amniogenesis, a process critical for continuation of healthy pregnancy, is triggered in a collection of pluripotent epiblast cells as the human embryo implants. Previous studies have established that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling is a major driver of this lineage specifying process, but the downstream BMP-dependent transcriptional networks that lead to successful amniogenesis remain to be identified. This is, in part, due to the current lack of a robust and reproducible model system that enables mechanistic investigations exclusively into amniogenesis. Here, we developed an improved model of early amnion specification, using a human pluripotent stem cell-based platform in which the activation of BMP signaling is controlled and synchronous. Uniform amniogenesis is seen within 48 hr after BMP activation, and the resulting cells share transcriptomic characteristics with amnion cells of a gastrulating human embryo. Using detailed time-course transcriptomic analyses, we established a previously uncharacterized BMP-dependent amniotic transcriptional cascade, and identified markers that represent five distinct stages of amnion fate specification; the expression of selected markers was validated in early post-implantation macaque embryos. Moreover, a cohort of factors that could potentially control specific stages of amniogenesis was identified, including the transcription factor TFAP2A. Functionally, we determined that, once amniogenesis is triggered by the BMP pathway, TFAP2A controls the progression of amniogenesis. This work presents a temporally resolved transcriptomic resource for several previously uncharacterized amniogenesis states and demonstrates a critical intermediate role for TFAP2A during amnion fate specification.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jingjing Liu, Yuedong Wang ... Yao Tian
    Research Article

    Axon projection is a spatial- and temporal-specific process in which the growth cone receives environmental signals guiding axons to their final destination. However, the mechanisms underlying changes in axonal projection direction without well-defined landmarks remain elusive. Here, we present evidence showcasing the dynamic nature of axonal projections in Drosophila’s small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs). Our findings reveal that these axons undergo an initial vertical projection in the early larval stage, followed by a subsequent transition to a horizontal projection in the early-to-mid third instar larvae. The vertical projection of s-LNv axons correlates with mushroom body calyx expansion, while the s-LNv-expressed Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam1) interacts with Netrins to regulate the horizontal projection. During a specific temporal window, locally newborn dorsal clock neurons secrete Netrins, facilitating the transition of axonal projection direction in s-LNvs. Our study establishes a compelling in vivo model to probe the mechanisms of axonal projection direction switching in the absence of clear landmarks. These findings underscore the significance of dynamic local microenvironments in the complementary regulation of axonal projection direction transitions.