Chloride-dependent mechanisms of multimodal sensory discrimination and nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila

Abstract

Individual sensory neurons can be tuned to many stimuli, each driving unique, stimulus-relevant behaviors, and the ability of multimodal nociceptor neurons to discriminate between potentially harmful and innocuous stimuli is broadly important for organismal survival. Moreover, disruptions in the capacity to differentiate between noxious and innocuous stimuli can result in neuropathic pain. Drosophila larval Class III (CIII) neurons are peripheral noxious cold nociceptors and innocuous touch mechanosensors; high levels of activation drive cold-evoked contraction (CT) behavior, while low levels of activation result in a suite of touch-associated behaviors. However, it is unknown what molecular factors underlie CIII multimodality. Here, we show that the TMEM16/anoctamins subdued and white walker (wwk; CG15270) are required for cold-evoked CT, but not for touch-associated behavior, indicating a conserved role for anoctamins in nociception. We also evidence that CIII neurons make use of atypical depolarizing chloride currents to encode cold, and that overexpression of ncc69-a fly homologue of NKCC1-results in phenotypes consistent with neuropathic sensitization, including behavioral sensitization and neuronal hyperexcitability, making Drosophila CIII neurons a candidate system for future studies of the basic mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript. We have plotted all data such that individual data points can be seen. Additionally, we have included heatmap representations of cold-evoked larval behavior for every single larva used in this study (see supplemental figures). Class III neuron-specific transcriptomic data has been deposited in GEO under accession number GSE69353. Accession numbers for sequences used in phylogenetic analysis are presented in the relevant figure. Raw data and sequence files are available in Dryad.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nathaniel J Himmel

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7876-6960
  2. Akira Sakurai

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2858-1620
  3. Atit A Patel

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Shatabdi Bhattacharjee

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jamin M Letcher

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3077-0615
  6. Maggie N Benson

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Thomas R Gray

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6176-005X
  8. Gennady S Cymbalyuk

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1889-5397
  9. Daniel N Cox

    Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
    For correspondence
    dcox18@gsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9191-9212

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NS115209)

  • Gennady S Cymbalyuk
  • Daniel N Cox

National Institutes of Health (NS117087)

  • Nathaniel J Himmel

Georgia State University (Honeycutt Fellowship)

  • Nathaniel J Himmel
  • Atit A Patel

Georgia State University (Brains & Behavior Fellowship)

  • Nathaniel J Himmel
  • Atit A Patel
  • Jamin M Letcher

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Himmel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,278
    views
  • 193
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76863

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Matthew R Kleinman, David J Foster
    Research Article

    Sequenced reactivations of hippocampal neurons called replays, concomitant with sharp-wave ripples in the local field potential, are critical for the consolidation of episodic memory, but whether replays depend on the brain’s reward or novelty signals is unknown. Here, we combined chemogenetic silencing of dopamine neurons in ventral tegmental area (VTA) and simultaneous electrophysiological recordings in dorsal hippocampal CA1, in freely behaving male rats experiencing changes to reward magnitude and environmental novelty. Surprisingly, VTA silencing did not prevent ripple increases where reward was increased, but caused dramatic, aberrant ripple increases where reward was unchanged. These increases were associated with increased reverse-ordered replays. On familiar tracks this effect disappeared, and ripples tracked reward prediction error (RPE), indicating that non-VTA reward signals were sufficient to direct replay. Our results reveal a novel dependence of hippocampal replay on dopamine, and a role for a VTA-independent RPE signal that is reliable only in familiar environments.

    1. Neuroscience
    Shuo Zhang, Yan Tian ... Haiyan Wu
    Research Article

    Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.