1. Neuroscience

Sparse genetically-defined neurons refine the canonical role of periaqueductal gray columnar organization

  1. Mimi Q La-Vu
  2. Ekayana Sethi
  3. Sandra Maesta-Pereira
  4. Peter J Schuette
  5. Brooke C Tobias
  6. Fernando MCV Reis
  7. Weisheng Wang
  8. Anita Torossian
  9. Amy Bishop
  10. Saskia J Leonard
  11. Lilly Lin
  12. Catherine M Cahill
  13. Avishek Adhikari  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77115
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Mimi Q La-Vu
  2. Ekayana Sethi
  3. Sandra Maesta-Pereira
  4. Peter J Schuette
  5. Brooke C Tobias
  6. Fernando MCV Reis
  7. Weisheng Wang
  8. Anita Torossian
  9. Amy Bishop
  10. Saskia J Leonard
  11. Lilly Lin
  12. Catherine M Cahill
  13. Avishek Adhikari
(2022)
Sparse genetically-defined neurons refine the canonical role of periaqueductal gray columnar organization
eLife 11:e77115.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77115
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

During encounters with external threats, survival depends on the engagement of appropriate defensive reactions to minimize harm. There are major clinical implications for identifying the neural circuitry and activation patterns that produce such defensive reactions, as maladaptive overactivation of these circuits underlies pathological human anxiety and fear responses. A compelling body of work has linked activation of large glutamatergic neuronal populations in the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) to defensive reactions such as freezing, flight and threat-induced analgesia. These pioneering data have firmly established that the overarching functional organization axis of the PAG is along anatomically-defined columnar boundaries. Accordingly, broad activation of the dorsolateral column induces flight, while activation of the lateral or ventrolateral (l and vl) columns induces freezing. However, the PAG contains a diverse arrangement of cell types that vary in neurochemical profile and location. How these cell types contribute to defensive responses remains largely unknown, indicating that targeting sparse, genetically-defined populations can lead to a deeper understanding of how the PAG generates a wide array of behaviors. Though several prior works showed that broad excitation of the lPAG or vlPAG causes freezing, we found in mice that activation of lateral and ventrolateral PAG (l/vlPAG) cholecystokinin-expressing (CCK) cells selectively caused flight to safer regions within an environment. Furthermore, inhibition of l/vlPAG-CCK cells reduced avoidance of a predatory threat without altering other defensive behaviors like freezing. Lastly, l/vlPAG-CCK activity decreased when approaching threat and increased during movement to safer locations. Taken together, these data suggest CCK cells are driving threat avoidance states, which are epochs during which mice increase distance from threat and perform evasive escape. In contrast, activating l/vlPAG cells pan-neuronally promoted freezing and these cells were activated near threat. These data underscore the importance of investigating genetically-identified PAG cells. Using this approach, we found a sparse population of CCK-expressing l/vlPAG cells that have distinct and opposing function and neural activation motifs compared to the broader local ensemble defined solely by columnar anatomical boundaries. Thus, in addition to the anatomical columnar architecture of the PAG, the molecular identity of PAG cells may confer an additional axis of functional organization, revealing unexplored functional heterogeneity.

Data availability

Data is available on Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5068/D12Q32

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mimi Q La-Vu

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Ekayana Sethi

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Sandra Maesta-Pereira

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Peter J Schuette

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Brooke C Tobias

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2043-9523

  6. Fernando MCV Reis

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Weisheng Wang

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Anita Torossian

    Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Amy Bishop

    Hatos Center for Neuropharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Saskia J Leonard

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  11. Lilly Lin

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  12. Catherine M Cahill

    Hatos Center for Neuropharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  13. Avishek Adhikari

    Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    avi@psych.ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9187-9211

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (R00 MH106649)

  • Avishek Adhikari

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/23092-3)

  • Fernando MCV Reis

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2017/08668-1)

  • Fernando MCV Reis

National Science Foundation (NSF-GRFP DGE-1650604)

  • Peter J Schuette

National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH119089)

  • Avishek Adhikari

National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH121050-01A1)

  • Mimi Q La-Vu

Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation

  • Mimi Q La-Vu

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (22663)

  • Avishek Adhikari

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (27654)

  • Fernando MCV Reis

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (27780)

  • Weisheng Wang

UCLA Health System (UCLA Affiliates fellowship)

  • Peter J Schuette

Hellman Foundation

  • Avishek Adhikari

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mihaela D Iordanova, Concordia University, Canada

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures conformed to guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health and have been approved by the University of California, Los Angeles Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #2017-011) .

Version history

  1. Received: January 15, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: January 21, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: May 25, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: June 8, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: June 23, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, La-Vu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,712
    views
  • 433
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mimi Q La-Vu
  2. Ekayana Sethi
  3. Sandra Maesta-Pereira
  4. Peter J Schuette
  5. Brooke C Tobias
  6. Fernando MCV Reis
  7. Weisheng Wang
  8. Anita Torossian
  9. Amy Bishop
  10. Saskia J Leonard
  11. Lilly Lin
  12. Catherine M Cahill
  13. Avishek Adhikari
(2022)
Sparse genetically-defined neurons refine the canonical role of periaqueductal gray columnar organization
eLife 11:e77115.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77115

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77115

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence in Drosophila

    Katharina Eichler, Stefanie Hampel ... Andrew M Seeds
    Research Advance

    Mechanosensory neurons located across the body surface respond to tactile stimuli and elicit diverse behavioral responses, from relatively simple stimulus location-aimed movements to complex movement sequences. How mechanosensory neurons and their postsynaptic circuits influence such diverse behaviors remains unclear. We previously discovered that Drosophila perform a body location-prioritized grooming sequence when mechanosensory neurons at different locations on the head and body are simultaneously stimulated by dust (Hampel et al., 2017; Seeds et al., 2014). Here, we identify nearly all mechanosensory neurons on the Drosophila head that individually elicit aimed grooming of specific head locations, while collectively eliciting a whole head grooming sequence. Different tracing methods were used to reconstruct the projections of these neurons from different locations on the head to their distinct arborizations in the brain. This provides the first synaptic resolution somatotopic map of a head, and defines the parallel-projecting mechanosensory pathways that elicit head grooming.

    1. Neuroscience

    Species -shared and -unique gyral peaks on human and macaque brains

    Songyao Zhang, Tuo Zhang ... Tianming Liu
    Research Article

    Cortical folding is an important feature of primate brains that plays a crucial role in various cognitive and behavioral processes. Extensive research has revealed both similarities and differences in folding morphology and brain function among primates including macaque and human. The folding morphology is the basis of brain function, making cross-species studies on folding morphology important for understanding brain function and species evolution. However, prior studies on cross-species folding morphology mainly focused on partial regions of the cortex instead of the entire brain. Previously, our research defined a whole-brain landmark based on folding morphology: the gyral peak. It was found to exist stably across individuals and ages in both human and macaque brains. Shared and unique gyral peaks in human and macaque are identified in this study, and their similarities and differences in spatial distribution, anatomical morphology, and functional connectivity were also dicussed.

    1. Neuroscience

    Lesions in a songbird vocal circuit increase variability in song syntax

    Avani Koparkar, Timothy L Warren ... Lena Veit
    Research Article

    Complex skills like speech and dance are composed of ordered sequences of simpler elements, but the neuronal basis for the syntactic ordering of actions is poorly understood. Birdsong is a learned vocal behavior composed of syntactically ordered syllables, controlled in part by the songbird premotor nucleus HVC (proper name). Here, we test whether one of HVC’s recurrent inputs, mMAN (medial magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium), contributes to sequencing in adult male Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica). Bengalese finch song includes several patterns: (1) chunks, comprising stereotyped syllable sequences; (2) branch points, where a given syllable can be followed probabilistically by multiple syllables; and (3) repeat phrases, where individual syllables are repeated variable numbers of times. We found that following bilateral lesions of mMAN, acoustic structure of syllables remained largely intact, but sequencing became more variable, as evidenced by ‘breaks’ in previously stereotyped chunks, increased uncertainty at branch points, and increased variability in repeat numbers. Our results show that mMAN contributes to the variable sequencing of vocal elements in Bengalese finch song and demonstrate the influence of recurrent projections to HVC. Furthermore, they highlight the utility of species with complex syntax in investigating neuronal control of ordered sequences.