Injury-induced pulmonary tuft cells are heterogenous, arise independent of key Type 2 cytokines, and are dispensable for dysplastic repair

  1. Justinn Barr
  2. Maria Elena Gentile
  3. Sunyoung Lee
  4. Maya E Kotas
  5. Maria Fernanda de Mello Costa
  6. Nicolas P Holcomb
  7. Abigail Jaquish
  8. Gargi Palashikar
  9. Marcella Soewignjo
  10. Margaret McDaniel
  11. Ichiro Matsumoto
  12. Robert Margolskee
  13. Jakob Von Moltke
  14. Noam A Cohen
  15. Xin Sun  Is a corresponding author
  16. Andrew E Vaughan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Diego, United States
  2. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  3. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  4. University of Washington, United States
  5. Monell Chemical Senses Center, United States

Abstract

While the lung bears significant regenerative capacity, severe viral pneumonia can chronically impair lung function by triggering dysplastic remodeling. The connection between these enduring changes and chronic disease remains poorly understood. We recently described the emergence of tuft cells within Krt5+ dysplastic regions after influenza injury. Using bulk and single cell transcriptomics, we characterized and delineated multiple distinct tuft cell populations that arise following influenza clearance. Distinct from intestinal tuft cells which rely on Type 2 immune signals for their expansion, neither IL-25 nor IL-4ra signaling are required to drive tuft cell development in dysplastic/injured lungs. In addition, tuft cell expansion occurred independently of type I or type III interferon signalling. Furthermore, tuft cells were also observed upon bleomycin injury, suggesting that their development may be a general response to severe lung injury. While intestinal tuft cells promote growth and differentiation of surrounding epithelial cells, in the lungs of tuft cell deficient mice, Krt5+ dysplasia still occurs, goblet cell production is unchanged, and there remains no appreciable contribution of Krt5+ cells into more regionally appropriate alveolar Type 2 cells. Together, these findings highlight unexpected differences in signals necessary for murine lung tuft cell amplification and establish a framework for future elucidation of tuft cell functions in pulmonary health and disease.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE197163.In addition to the deposited sequencing data, raw numerical data is available as excel files corresponding to each figure, e.g. Figure 1 - Source Data.xls.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Justinn Barr

    Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Maria Elena Gentile

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sunyoung Lee

    Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maya E Kotas

    Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy & Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Maria Fernanda de Mello Costa

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nicolas P Holcomb

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Abigail Jaquish

    Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gargi Palashikar

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marcella Soewignjo

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Margaret McDaniel

    Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ichiro Matsumoto

    Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Robert Margolskee

    Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jakob Von Moltke

    Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Noam A Cohen

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Xin Sun

    Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    xinsun@health.ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8387-4966
  16. Andrew E Vaughan

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    andrewva@vet.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5740-643X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01HL153539)

  • Andrew E Vaughan

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (CX001617)

  • Noam A Cohen

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé

  • Maria Elena Gentile

Lisa Dean Moseley Foundation

  • Andrew E Vaughan

National Institutes of Health (R01HL142215)

  • Xin Sun

National Institutes of Health (1R01AT011676)

  • Xin Sun

National Institutes of Health (T29IR0475)

  • Xin Sun

National Institutes of Health (F32HL151168)

  • Justinn Barr

National Institutes of Health (F32HL140868)

  • Maya E Kotas

National Institutes of Health (T32HL007185)

  • Maya E Kotas

A.P. Giannini Foundation

  • Maya E Kotas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Pennsylvania, the University of California - San Diego, and the University of California, San Francisco. All experiments were performed with every effort to minimize suffering. The protocol number associated with the ethical approval of this work is 806262 (University of Pennsylvania) and S16187 (University of California San Diego).

Copyright

© 2022, Barr et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,503
    views
  • 515
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Justinn Barr
  2. Maria Elena Gentile
  3. Sunyoung Lee
  4. Maya E Kotas
  5. Maria Fernanda de Mello Costa
  6. Nicolas P Holcomb
  7. Abigail Jaquish
  8. Gargi Palashikar
  9. Marcella Soewignjo
  10. Margaret McDaniel
  11. Ichiro Matsumoto
  12. Robert Margolskee
  13. Jakob Von Moltke
  14. Noam A Cohen
  15. Xin Sun
  16. Andrew E Vaughan
(2022)
Injury-induced pulmonary tuft cells are heterogenous, arise independent of key Type 2 cytokines, and are dispensable for dysplastic repair
eLife 11:e78074.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78074

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78074

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Ana Catarina Costa, Blanca R Murillo ... Monica M Sousa
    Research Article

    Sensory dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons have a unique pseudo-unipolar morphology in which a stem axon bifurcates into a peripheral and a central axon, with different regenerative abilities. Whereas peripheral DRG axons regenerate, central axons are unable to regrow. Central axon regeneration can however be elicited by a prior conditioning lesion to the peripheral axon. How DRG axon asymmetry is established remains unknown. Here we developed a rodent in vitro system replicating DRG pseudo-unipolarization and asymmetric axon regeneration. Using this model, we observed that from early development, central DRG axons have a higher density of growing microtubules. This asymmetry was also present in vivo and was abolished by a conditioning lesion that decreased microtubule polymerization of central DRG axons. An axon-specific microtubule-associated protein (MAP) signature, including the severases spastin and katanin and the microtubule regulators CRMP5 and tau, was found and shown to adapt upon conditioning lesion. Supporting its significance, interfering with the DRG MAP signature either in vitro or in vivo readily abolished central-peripheral asymmetries in microtubule dynamics and regenerative ability. In summary, our data unveil that axon-specific microtubule regulation drives asymmetric regeneration of sensory neuron axons.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Ruben Sebastian-Perez, Shoma Nakagawa ... Maria Pia Cosma
    Research Article

    Chromocenters are established after the 2-cell (2C) stage during mouse embryonic development, but the factors that mediate chromocenter formation remain largely unknown. To identify regulators of 2C heterochromatin establishment in mice, we generated an inducible system to convert embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to 2C-like cells. This conversion is marked by a global reorganization and dispersion of H3K9me3-heterochromatin foci, which are then reversibly formed upon re-entry into pluripotency. By profiling the chromatin-bound proteome (chromatome) through genome capture of ESCs transitioning to 2C-like cells, we uncover chromatin regulators involved in de novo heterochromatin formation. We identified TOPBP1 and investigated its binding partner SMARCAD1. SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 associate with H3K9me3-heterochromatin in ESCs. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of SMARCAD1 is lost in 2C-like cells. SMARCAD1 or TOPBP1 depletion in mouse embryos leads to developmental arrest, reduction of H3K9me3, and remodeling of heterochromatin foci. Collectively, our findings contribute to comprehending the maintenance of chromocenters during early development.