Environmental DNA from archived leaves reveals widespread temporal turnover and biotic homogenization in forest arthropod communities

  1. Henrik Krehenwinkel  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sven Weber
  3. Rieke Broekmann
  4. Anja Melcher
  5. Julian Hans
  6. Rüdiger Wolf
  7. Axel Hochkirch
  8. Susan Rachel Kennedy
  9. Jan Koschorrek
  10. Sven Künzel
  11. Christoph Müller
  12. Rebecca Reztlaff
  13. Diana Teubner
  14. Sonja Schanzer
  15. Roland Klein
  16. Martin Paulus
  17. Thomas Udelhoven
  18. Michael Veith
  1. University of Trier, Germany
  2. German Federal Environment Agency, Germany
  3. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Germany
  4. Ludwig Maximilians University, Germany

Abstract

A major limitation of current reports on insect declines is the lack of standardized, long-term, and taxonomically broad time series. Here, we demonstrate the utility of environmental DNA from archived leaf material to characterize plant-associated arthropod communities. We base our work on several multi-decadal leaf time series from tree canopies in four land use types, which were sampled as part of a long-term environmental monitoring program across Germany. Using these highly standardized and well-preserved samples, we analyze temporal changes in communities of several thousand arthropod species belonging to 23 orders using metabarcoding and quantitative PCR. Our data do not support widespread declines of α-diversity or genetic variation within sites. Instead, we find a gradual community turnover, which results in temporal and spatial biotic homogenization, across all land use types and all arthropod orders. Our results suggest that insect decline is more complex than mere α-diversity loss, but can be driven by β-diversity decay across space and time.

Data availability

All raw reads are available in the Dryad Digital Repository (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.x0k6djhmp).The OTU table with metadata and qPCR resullts has been uploaded as Supplementary Material

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Henrik Krehenwinkel

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    For correspondence
    krehenwinkel@uni-trier.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5069-8601
  2. Sven Weber

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rieke Broekmann

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anja Melcher

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Julian Hans

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rüdiger Wolf

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8144-5954
  7. Axel Hochkirch

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Susan Rachel Kennedy

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jan Koschorrek

    German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sven Künzel

    Department Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Christoph Müller

    Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rebecca Reztlaff

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Diana Teubner

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Sonja Schanzer

    Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Roland Klein

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8735-0393
  16. Martin Paulus

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Thomas Udelhoven

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Michael Veith

    University of Trier, Trier, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

No external funding was received for this work.

Copyright

© 2022, Krehenwinkel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,131
    views
  • 333
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Henrik Krehenwinkel
  2. Sven Weber
  3. Rieke Broekmann
  4. Anja Melcher
  5. Julian Hans
  6. Rüdiger Wolf
  7. Axel Hochkirch
  8. Susan Rachel Kennedy
  9. Jan Koschorrek
  10. Sven Künzel
  11. Christoph Müller
  12. Rebecca Reztlaff
  13. Diana Teubner
  14. Sonja Schanzer
  15. Roland Klein
  16. Martin Paulus
  17. Thomas Udelhoven
  18. Michael Veith
(2022)
Environmental DNA from archived leaves reveals widespread temporal turnover and biotic homogenization in forest arthropod communities
eLife 11:e78521.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78521

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78521

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Mathilde Delacoux, Fumihiro Kano
    Research Article

    During collective vigilance, it is commonly assumed that individual animals compromise their feeding time to be vigilant against predators, benefiting the entire group. One notable issue with this assumption concerns the unclear nature of predator ‘detection’, particularly in terms of vision. It remains uncertain how a vigilant individual utilizes its high-acuity vision (such as the fovea) to detect a predator cue and subsequently guide individual and collective escape responses. Using fine-scale motion-capture technologies, we tracked the head and body orientations of pigeons (hence reconstructed their visual fields and foveal projections) foraging in a flock during simulated predator attacks. Pigeons used their fovea to inspect predator cues. Earlier foveation on a predator cue was linked to preceding behaviors related to vigilance and feeding, such as head-up or down positions, head-scanning, and food-pecking. Moreover, earlier foveation predicted earlier evasion flights at both the individual and collective levels. However, we also found that relatively long delay between their foveation and escape responses in individuals obscured the relationship between these two responses. While our results largely support the existing assumptions about vigilance, they also underscore the importance of considering vision and addressing the disparity between detection and escape responses in future research.

    1. Ecology
    Elham Nourani, Louise Faure ... Kamran Safi
    Research Article

    The heterogeneity of the physical environment determines the cost of transport for animals, shaping their energy landscape. Animals respond to this energy landscape by adjusting their distribution and movement to maximize gains and reduce costs. Much of our knowledge about energy landscape dynamics focuses on factors external to the animal, particularly the spatio-temporal variations of the environment. However, an animal’s internal state can significantly impact its ability to perceive and utilize available energy, creating a distinction between the ‘fundamental’ and the ‘realized’ energy landscapes. Here, we show that the realized energy landscape varies along the ontogenetic axis. Locomotor and cognitive capabilities of individuals change over time, especially during the early life stages. We investigate the development of the realized energy landscape in the Central European Alpine population of the golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos, a large predator that requires negotiating the atmospheric environment to achieve energy-efficient soaring flight. We quantified weekly energy landscapes using environmental features for 55 juvenile golden eagles, demonstrating that energetic costs of traversing the landscape decreased with age. Consequently, the potentially flyable area within the Alpine region increased 2170-fold during their first three years of independence. Our work contributes to a predictive understanding of animal movement by presenting ontogeny as a mechanism shaping the realized energy landscape.