(A) Schematic of the combined fast 3D acousto-optical (AO) imaging and behavior experiments. Head-restrained mice were trained to perform a sensory discrimination, an auditory go-no-go task during …
(A) The somatic Ca2+ responses in Figure 1C shown in transient form. (B) The same somatic Ca2+ responses as in Figure 1C but ordered according to their cortical depth (left) and cell diameter …
Z-stack from half mm3 neocortical volume was obtained in the parietal cortex. Then small squares containing the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide interneurons’ somata were selected as regions of …
Example, false alarm trial of an imaging session with pupillometry, velocity recording, and motion-corrected calcium imaging of 52 VIP interneurons. Flashing white speaker and red air cloud icons …
Fiber photometry data were recorded simultaneously from medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and auditory cortex (ACx) regions and are shown in gray boxes. Functional map (Pankhurst et al., 2012) used …
(A) Raster plot of the trial-to-trial activation of the responsive VIP neurons in Hit and false alarm (FA) trials during the two-photon imaging sessions (n=18 sessions, n=16 mice, n=746 cells). (B) …
(A) Left, explained variance. We used five principal components (PCs), explaining >90% of the variance of our data for the k-means clustering. Right, neurons from individual recording sessions are …
(A) Left, maximal intensity projection of the GCaMP6f-labeled VIP interneuron population imaged by fast three-dimensional acousto-optical scanning in one of the sessions. Thin yellow lines symbolize …
(A) Upper left, schematic of measurements. Pupil and movement were simultaneously monitored during three-dimensional (3D) imaging in the auditory go-no-go task. Upper right, high (orange) and low …
(A) Population averages for Miss and correct rejection (CR; left and middle) during high and low arousal change in the somatosensory (SS) and motor (Mtr) regions (left), and auditory cortex (ACx) …
(A) Pupil diameter, locomotion speed, and activity of multiple VIP interneurons in an example trial where reinforcement did not trigger any increase in arousal. (B) Top, relative change in pupil …
Orientation tuning was mapped in a first set of experiments (Exp. 1) which was followed by recordings of the same neurons during the auditory go-no-go task (Exp. 2). Both set of recordings were …
(A) Scatter plot of reinforcement- vs visual stimulation-induced responses of the same vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) cells. (B) Scatter plot of reinforcement-induced responses vs …
Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Recombinant DNA reagent | AAV9.Syn.Flex. GCaMP6f.WPRE.SV40 | Penn Vector Core | Cat# AV-1-PV2819 | |
Biological sample (Mus musculus) | Viptm.1(cre)Zjh/J, B6.129P2-Pvalbtm1(cre)Arbr/J, FVB/N-Tg(Thy1-cre)1Vln/J, | The Jackson Laboratory | RRID: IMSR_JAX:010908 RRID: IMSR_JAX:017320 RRID: IMSR_JAX:006143 | |
Software, algorithm | MATLAB | MathWorks | ||
Software, algorithm | MES | Femtonics |
Comparison of different scanning methods.
Scanning speed was calculated according to the equations in the column ‘calculation of scanning speed’. Ratio of collected photons was calculated from relative pixel dwell times. All parameters used for calculations are listed in the bottom field. Note, that chessboard scanning provides 170-fold faster measurement speed and 244-fold higher photon collection compared to volume scanning with resonant mirrors.
Calculation of ratio of responsive neurons following reward.