The termination of UHRF1-dependent PAF15 ubiquitin signaling is regulated by USP7 and ATAD5

Abstract

UHRF1-dependent ubiquitin signaling plays an integral role in the regulation of maintenance DNA methylation. UHRF1 catalyzes transient dual mono-ubiquitylation of PAF15 (PAF15Ub2), which regulates the localization and activation of DNMT1 at DNA methylation sites during DNA replication. Although the initiation of UHRF1-mediated PAF15 ubiquitin signaling has been relatively well characterized, mechanisms underlying its termination and how they are coordinated with the completion of maintenance DNA methylation have not yet been clarified. This study shows that deubiquitylation by USP7 and unloading by ATAD5 (ELG1 in yeast) are pivotal processes for the removal of PAF15 from chromatin. On replicating chromatin, USP7 specifically interacts with PAF15Ub2 in a complex with DNMT1. USP7 depletion or inhibition of the interaction between USP7 and PAF15 results in abnormal accumulation of PAF15Ub2 on chromatin. Furthermore, we also find that the non-ubiquitylated form of PAF15 (PAF15Ub0) is removed from chromatin in an ATAD5-dependent manner. PAF15Ub2 was retained at high levels on chromatin when the catalytic activity of DNMT1 was inhibited, suggesting that the completion of maintenance DNA methylation is essential for termination of UHRF1-mediated ubiquitin signaling. This finding provides a molecular understanding of how the maintenance DNA methylation machinery is disassembled at the end of the S phase.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files for all figures have been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ryota Miyashita

    Division of Cancer Cell Biology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1452-8829
  2. Atsuya Nishiyama

    Division of Cancer Cell Biology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    uanishiyama@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8416-3776
  3. Weihua Qin

    Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yoshie Chiba

    Division of Cancer Cell Biology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Satomi Kori

    Structural Biology Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Norie Kato

    Structural Biology Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chieko Konishi

    Division of Cancer Cell Biology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Soichiro Kumamoto

    Division of Cancer Cell Biology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hiroko Kozuka-Hata

    Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Masaaki Oyama

    Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yoshitaka Kawasoe

    Department of Biology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Toshiki Tsurimoto

    Department of Biology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Tatsuro S Takahashi

    Department of Biology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Heinrich Leonhardt

    Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Kyohei Arita

    Structural Biology Laboratory, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Makoto Nakanishi

    Division of Cancer Cell Biology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    mkt-naka@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6707-3584

Funding

MEXT/JSPS (JP19H05740)

  • Makoto Nakanishi

MEXT/JSPS (JP19H03143)

  • Atsuya Nishiyama

MEXT/JSPS (JP19H05285)

  • Atsuya Nishiyama

MEXT/JSPS (JP16H06578)

  • Masaaki Oyama

MEXT/JSPS (JP19H05741)

  • Kyohei Arita

MEXT/JSPS (20H03186)

  • Tatsuro S Takahashi

MEXT/JSPS (20H05392)

  • Tatsuro S Takahashi

MEXT/JSPS (19K16042)

  • Yoshitaka Kawasoe

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Miyashita et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,715
    views

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ryota Miyashita
  2. Atsuya Nishiyama
  3. Weihua Qin
  4. Yoshie Chiba
  5. Satomi Kori
  6. Norie Kato
  7. Chieko Konishi
  8. Soichiro Kumamoto
  9. Hiroko Kozuka-Hata
  10. Masaaki Oyama
  11. Yoshitaka Kawasoe
  12. Toshiki Tsurimoto
  13. Tatsuro S Takahashi
  14. Heinrich Leonhardt
  15. Kyohei Arita
  16. Makoto Nakanishi
(2023)
The termination of UHRF1-dependent PAF15 ubiquitin signaling is regulated by USP7 and ATAD5
eLife 12:e79013.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79013

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79013

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Beibei Liu ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    Distal appendages are nine-fold symmetric blade-like structures attached to the distal end of the mother centriole. These structures are critical for formation of the primary cilium, by regulating at least four critical steps: ciliary vesicle recruitment, recruitment and initiation of intraflagellar transport (IFT), and removal of CP110. While specific proteins that localize to the distal appendages have been identified, how exactly each protein functions to achieve the multiple roles of the distal appendages is poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyze known and newly discovered distal appendage proteins (CEP83, SCLT1, CEP164, TTBK2, FBF1, CEP89, KIZ, ANKRD26, PIDD1, LRRC45, NCS1, CEP15) for their precise localization, order of recruitment, and their roles in each step of cilia formation. Using CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts, we show that the order of the recruitment of the distal appendage proteins is highly interconnected and a more complex hierarchy. Our analysis highlights two protein modules, CEP83-SCLT1 and CEP164-TTBK2, as critical for structural assembly of distal appendages. Functional assays revealed that CEP89 selectively functions in RAB34+ ciliary vesicle recruitment, while deletion of the integral components, CEP83-SCLT1-CEP164-TTBK2, severely compromised all four steps of cilium formation. Collectively, our analyses provide a more comprehensive view of the organization and the function of the distal appendage, paving the way for molecular understanding of ciliary assembly.