Insulin sensitivity is preserved in mice made obese by feeding a high starch diet

Abstract

Obesity is generally associated with insulin resistance in liver and muscle and increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, however there is a population of obese people that remain insulin sensitive. Similarly, recent work suggests that mice fed high carbohydrate diets can become obese without apparent glucose intolerance. To investigate this phenomenon further, we fed mice either a high fat (Hi-F) or high starch (Hi-ST) diet and measured adiposity, glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and tissue lipids compared to control mice fed a standard laboratory chow. Both Hi-ST and Hi-F mice accumulated a similar amount of fat and tissue triglyceride compared to chow-fed mice. However while Hi-F diet mice developed glucose intolerance as well as liver and muscle insulin resistance (assessed via euglycemic/hyperinsulinemic clamp), obese Hi-ST mice maintained glucose tolerance and insulin action similar to lean, chow-fed controls. This preservation of insulin action despite obesity in Hi-ST mice was associated with differences in de novo lipogenesis and levels of C22:0 ceramide in liver and C18:0 ceramide in muscle. This indicates that dietary manipulation can influence insulin action independently of the level of adiposity and that the presence of specific ceramide species correlate with these differences.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for Figures 1,2,3,4,5, and 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amanda E Brandon

    School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    For correspondence
    amanda.brandon@sydney.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4996-7189
  2. Lewin Small

    Diabetes and Metabolism Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9767-9464
  3. Tuong-Vi Nguyen

    Diabetes and Metabolism Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eurwin Suryana

    Diabetes and Metabolism Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Syndey, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Henry Gong

    School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christian Yassmin

    School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sarah E Hancock

    Department of Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Tamara Pulpitel

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sophie Stonehouse

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Letisha Prescott

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Melkam A Kebede

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9686-7378
  12. Belinda Yau

    School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Lake-Ee Quek

    School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Greg M Kowalski

    Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Clinton R Bruce

    Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0515-3343
  16. Nigel Turner

    Department of Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Gregory J Cooney

    School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (Fellowship 1003313)

  • Gregory J Cooney

National Health and Medical Research Council (Program grant 535921)

  • Gregory J Cooney

Diabetes Australia Research Trust (Grant)

  • Gregory J Cooney

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jonathan S Bogan, Yale School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures performed were approved by the Garvan Institute/St Vincent's Hospital Animal Ethics Committee and were in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia's guidelines on animal experimentation (protocol number 14_07).

Version history

  1. Received: April 5, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: May 26, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: November 16, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 17, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 30, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Brandon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,087
    views
  • 342
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amanda E Brandon
  2. Lewin Small
  3. Tuong-Vi Nguyen
  4. Eurwin Suryana
  5. Henry Gong
  6. Christian Yassmin
  7. Sarah E Hancock
  8. Tamara Pulpitel
  9. Sophie Stonehouse
  10. Letisha Prescott
  11. Melkam A Kebede
  12. Belinda Yau
  13. Lake-Ee Quek
  14. Greg M Kowalski
  15. Clinton R Bruce
  16. Nigel Turner
  17. Gregory J Cooney
(2022)
Insulin sensitivity is preserved in mice made obese by feeding a high starch diet
eLife 11:e79250.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79250

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79250

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jaebin Kim, Edwin Bustamante ... Scott H Soderling
    Research Article

    One of the most extensively studied members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, Rac1 is an intracellular signal transducer that remodels actin and phosphorylation signaling networks. Previous studies have shown that Rac1-mediated signaling is associated with hippocampal-dependent working memory and longer-term forms of learning and memory and that Rac1 can modulate forms of both pre- and postsynaptic plasticity. How these different cognitive functions and forms of plasticity mediated by Rac1 are linked, however, is unclear. Here, we show that spatial working memory in mice is selectively impaired following the expression of a genetically encoded Rac1 inhibitor at presynaptic terminals, while longer-term cognitive processes are affected by Rac1 inhibition at postsynaptic sites. To investigate the regulatory mechanisms of this presynaptic process, we leveraged new advances in mass spectrometry to identify the proteomic and post-translational landscape of presynaptic Rac1 signaling. We identified serine/threonine kinases and phosphorylated cytoskeletal signaling and synaptic vesicle proteins enriched with active Rac1. The phosphorylated sites in these proteins are at positions likely to have regulatory effects on synaptic vesicles. Consistent with this, we also report changes in the distribution and morphology of synaptic vesicles and in postsynaptic ultrastructure following presynaptic Rac1 inhibition. Overall, this study reveals a previously unrecognized presynaptic role of Rac1 signaling in cognitive processes and provides insights into its potential regulatory mechanisms.