β-cell deletion of the PKm1 and PKm2 isoforms of pyruvate kinase in mice reveal their essential role as nutrient sensors for the KATP channel

  1. Hannah R Foster
  2. Thuong Ho
  3. Evgeniy Potapenko
  4. Sophia M Sdao
  5. Shih Ming Huang
  6. Sophie L Lewandowski
  7. Halena R VanDeusen
  8. Shawn M Davidson
  9. Rebecca L Cardone
  10. Marc Prentki
  11. Richard G Kibbey
  12. Matthew J Merrins  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  3. Yale University, United States
  4. University of Montreal, Canada

Abstract

Pyruvate kinase (PK) and the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) cycle play key roles in nutrient-stimulated KATP channel closure and insulin secretion. To identify the PK isoforms involved, we generated mice lacking β-cell PKm1, PKm2, and mitochondrial PEP carboxykinase (PCK2) that generates mitochondrial PEP. Glucose metabolism generates both glycolytic and mitochondrially-derived PEP, which triggers KATP closure through local PKm1 and PKm2 signaling at the plasma membrane. Amino acids, which generate mitochondrial PEP without producing glycolytic fructose 1,6-bisphosphate to allosterically activate PKm2, signal through PKm1 to raise ATP/ADP, close KATP channels, and stimulate insulin secretion. Raising cytosolic ATP/ADP with amino acids is insufficient to close KATP channels in the absence of PK activity or PCK2, indicating that KATP channels are primarily regulated by PEP that provides ATP via plasma membrane-associated PK, rather than mitochondrially-derived ATP. Following membrane depolarization, the PEP cycle is also involved in an 'off-switch' that facilitates KATP channel reopening and Ca2+ extrusion, as shown by PK activation experiments and β-cell PCK2 deletion, which prolongs Ca2+ oscillations and increases insulin secretion. In conclusion, the differential response of PKm1 and PKm2 to the glycolytic and mitochondrial sources of PEP influences the β-cell nutrient response, and controls the oscillatory cycle regulating insulin secretion.

Data availability

Datasets generated or analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files are provided for Figures 1-6 and the associated figure supplement files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hannah R Foster

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Thuong Ho

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Evgeniy Potapenko

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sophia M Sdao

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shih Ming Huang

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sophie L Lewandowski

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Halena R VanDeusen

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shawn M Davidson

    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rebecca L Cardone

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Marc Prentki

    Department of Nutrition, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Richard G Kibbey

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthew J Merrins

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    For correspondence
    merrins@wisc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1599-9227

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01DK113103)

  • Matthew J Merrins

National Institutes of Health (R01DK113103)

  • Matthew J Merrins

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01B005113)

  • Matthew J Merrins

Health Resources and Services Administration (T32HP10010)

  • Hannah R Foster

National Institutes of Health (T32AG000213)

  • Hannah R Foster

National Institutes of Health (T32DK007665)

  • Sophie L Lewandowski

American Diabetes Association (1-17-PDF-155)

  • Halena R VanDeusen

National Institutes of Health (R01AG062328)

  • Matthew J Merrins

National Institutes of Health (R01DK127637)

  • Richard G Kibbey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted under the supervision of the IACUC of the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (Protocol: MJM0001).

Copyright

© 2022, Foster et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,082
    views
  • 463
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hannah R Foster
  2. Thuong Ho
  3. Evgeniy Potapenko
  4. Sophia M Sdao
  5. Shih Ming Huang
  6. Sophie L Lewandowski
  7. Halena R VanDeusen
  8. Shawn M Davidson
  9. Rebecca L Cardone
  10. Marc Prentki
  11. Richard G Kibbey
  12. Matthew J Merrins
(2022)
β-cell deletion of the PKm1 and PKm2 isoforms of pyruvate kinase in mice reveal their essential role as nutrient sensors for the KATP channel
eLife 11:e79422.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79422

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79422

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.