NaV1.1 is essential for proprioceptive signaling and motor behaviors

  1. Cyrrus M Espino
  2. Cheyanne M Lewis
  3. Serena Ortiz
  4. Miloni S Dalal
  5. Snigdha Garlapalli
  6. Kaylee M Wells
  7. Darik A O'Neil
  8. Katherine A Wilkinson
  9. Theanne N Griffith  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Davis, United States
  2. San Jose State University, United States
  3. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States
  4. Marine Biological Laboratory, United States

Abstract

The voltage-gated sodium channel (NaV), NaV1.1, is well-studied in the central nervous system; conversely, its contribution to peripheral sensory neuron function is more enigmatic. Here, we identify a new role for NaV1.1 in mammalian proprioception. RNAscope analysis and in vitro patch clamp recordings in genetically identified mouse proprioceptors show ubiquitous channel expression and significant contributions to intrinsic excitability. Notably, genetic deletion of NaV1.1 in sensory neurons caused profound and visible motor coordination deficits in conditional knockout mice of both sexes, similar to conditional Piezo2-knockout animals, suggesting this channel is a major contributor to sensory proprioceptive transmission. Ex vivo muscle afferent recordings from conditional knockout mice found that loss of NaV1.1 leads to inconsistent and unreliable proprioceptor firing characterized by action potential failures during static muscle stretch; conversely, afferent responses to dynamic vibrations were unaffected. This suggests that while a combination of Piezo2 and other NaV isoforms are sufficient to elicit activity in response to transient stimuli, NaV1.1 is required for transmission of receptor potentials generated during sustained muscle stretch. Impressively, recordings from afferents of heterozygous conditional knockout animals were similarly impaired, and heterozygous conditional knockout mice also exhibited motor behavioral deficits. Thus, NaV1.1 haploinsufficiency in sensory neurons impairs both proprioceptor function and motor behaviors. Importantly, human patients harboring NaV1.1 loss-of-function mutations often present with motor delays and ataxia; therefore, our data suggest sensory neuron dysfunction contributes to the clinical manifestations of neurological disorders in which NaV1.1 function is compromised. Collectively, we present the first evidence that NaV1.1 is essential for mammalian proprioceptive signaling and behaviors.

Data availability

Source Data files have been uploaded to Mendeley for all figures (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/kt23th75v9). Code has been uploaded to GitHub (https://github.com/doctheagrif/Current-Clamp-Matlab-Code_O-Neil-DA). A key resources table with specific organism and reagent information has been included in the methods section.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cyrrus M Espino

    Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2708-4577
  2. Cheyanne M Lewis

    Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0057-2047
  3. Serena Ortiz

    Department of Biological Science, San Jose State University, San Jose, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Miloni S Dalal

    Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Snigdha Garlapalli

    Undergraduate program in Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kaylee M Wells

    Neurobiology, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Darik A O'Neil

    Neurobiology, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Katherine A Wilkinson

    Department of Biological Science, San Jose State University, San Jose, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2692-5533
  9. Theanne N Griffith

    Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    For correspondence
    tgriffith@ucdavis.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0090-6286

Funding

Burroughs Wellcome Fund

  • Theanne N Griffith

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5T32GM099608-10)

  • Cyrrus M Espino

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1T32GM1144303-01A1)

  • Cyrrus M Espino

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5SC3GM127195)

  • Katherine A Wilkinson

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5R25GM71381)

  • Serena Ortiz

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R25NS063307)

  • Kaylee M Wells
  • Darik A O'Neil

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal use was conducted according to guidelines from the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rutgers University-Newark (PROTO201900161), UC Davis (#21947 and #22438) and San José State University (#990, ex vivo muscle recordings).

Copyright

© 2022, Espino et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,985
    views
  • 399
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cyrrus M Espino
  2. Cheyanne M Lewis
  3. Serena Ortiz
  4. Miloni S Dalal
  5. Snigdha Garlapalli
  6. Kaylee M Wells
  7. Darik A O'Neil
  8. Katherine A Wilkinson
  9. Theanne N Griffith
(2022)
NaV1.1 is essential for proprioceptive signaling and motor behaviors
eLife 11:e79917.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79917

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79917

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Roshani Nhuchhen Pradhan, Craig Montell, Youngseok Lee
    Research Article

    The question as to whether animals taste cholesterol taste is not resolved. This study investigates whether the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is capable of detecting cholesterol through their gustatory system. We found that flies are indifferent to low levels of cholesterol and avoid higher levels. The avoidance is mediated by gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs), demonstrating that flies can taste cholesterol. The cholesterol-responsive GRNs comprise a subset that also responds to bitter substances. Cholesterol detection depends on five ionotropic receptor (IR) family members, and disrupting any of these genes impairs the flies' ability to avoid cholesterol. Ectopic expressions of these IRs in GRNs reveals two classes of cholesterol receptors, each with three shared IRs and one unique subunit. Additionally, expressing cholesterol receptors in sugar-responsive GRNs confers attraction to cholesterol. This study reveals that flies can taste cholesterol, and that the detection depends on IRs in GRNs.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Tanya Wolff, Mark Eddison ... Gerald M Rubin
    Research Article

    The central complex (CX) plays a key role in many higher-order functions of the insect brain including navigation and activity regulation. Genetic tools for manipulating individual cell types, and knowledge of what neurotransmitters and neuromodulators they express, will be required to gain mechanistic understanding of how these functions are implemented. We generated and characterized split-GAL4 driver lines that express in individual or small subsets of about half of CX cell types. We surveyed neuropeptide and neuropeptide receptor expression in the central brain using fluorescent in situ hybridization. About half of the neuropeptides we examined were expressed in only a few cells, while the rest were expressed in dozens to hundreds of cells. Neuropeptide receptors were expressed more broadly and at lower levels. Using our GAL4 drivers to mark individual cell types, we found that 51 of the 85 CX cell types we examined expressed at least one neuropeptide and 21 expressed multiple neuropeptides. Surprisingly, all co-expressed a small molecule neurotransmitter. Finally, we used our driver lines to identify CX cell types whose activation affects sleep, and identified other central brain cell types that link the circadian clock to the CX. The well-characterized genetic tools and information on neuropeptide and neurotransmitter expression we provide should enhance studies of the CX.