Robust cone-mediated signaling persists late into rod photoreceptor degeneration

  1. Miranda L Scalabrino
  2. Mishek Thapa
  3. Lindsey A Chew
  4. Esther Zhang
  5. Jason Xu
  6. Alapakkam P Sampath
  7. Jeannie Chen
  8. Greg D Field  Is a corresponding author
  1. Duke University, United States
  2. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  3. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Rod photoreceptor degeneration causes deterioration in the morphology and physiology of cone photoreceptors along with changes in retinal circuits. These changes could diminish visual signaling at cone-mediated light levels, thereby limiting the efficacy of treatments such as gene therapy for rescuing normal, cone-mediated vision. However, the impact of progressive rod death on cone-mediated signaling remains unclear. To investigate the fidelity of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) signaling throughout disease progression, we used a mouse model of rod degeneration (Cngb1neo/neo). Despite clear deterioration of cone morphology with rod death, cone-mediated signaling among RGCs remained surprisingly robust: spatiotemporal receptive fields changed little and the mutual information between stimuli and spiking responses was relatively constant. This relative stability held until nearly all rods had died and cones had completely lost well-formed outer segments. Interestingly, RGC information rates were higher and more stable for natural movies than checkerboard noise as degeneration progressed. The main change in RGC responses with photoreceptor degeneration was a decrease in response gain. These results suggest that gene therapies for rod degenerative diseases are likely to prolong cone-mediated vision even if there are changes to cone morphology and density.

Data availability

Data to generate all summary plots in Figures 1-11 are included in the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/mishek-thapa/cng-data; they are also available as source data files with the manuscript. For physiology data, we have not provided the raw data files (voltage as a function of time on all electrodes) because these files are enormous (in excess of 5 TB). Raw data will be provided upon request by contacting the corresponding author. Requests will be met provided the data will not be used for commercial purposes. MATLAB code for information calculations are available in the above GitHub repository. The Cngbneo/neo mouse model is available to be shared upon request. Raw image files from Figure 1 can be found at doi:10.5061/dryad.x95x69pmq.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Miranda L Scalabrino

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mishek Thapa

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2868-7348
  3. Lindsey A Chew

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2040-1579
  4. Esther Zhang

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jason Xu

    Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5472-3720
  6. Alapakkam P Sampath

    Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jeannie Chen

    Zilkha Neurogenetics Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7904-9629
  8. Greg D Field

    Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    For correspondence
    field@neuro.duke.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5942-2679

Funding

National Eye Institute (EY024280)

  • Alapakkam P Sampath
  • Jeannie Chen
  • Greg D Field

National Eye Institute (EY5722)

  • Greg D Field

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mice were used according to Duke University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (protocol A084-21-04) and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology guidelines for the use of animals in vision research.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marla B Feller, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: April 28, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 13, 2022
  3. Accepted: August 25, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 30, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 13, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: January 12, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Scalabrino et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 863
    Page views
  • 237
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Miranda L Scalabrino
  2. Mishek Thapa
  3. Lindsey A Chew
  4. Esther Zhang
  5. Jason Xu
  6. Alapakkam P Sampath
  7. Jeannie Chen
  8. Greg D Field
(2022)
Robust cone-mediated signaling persists late into rod photoreceptor degeneration
eLife 11:e80271.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80271

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Amanda J González Segarra, Gina Pontes ... Kristin Scott
    Research Article

    Consumption of food and water is tightly regulated by the nervous system to maintain internal nutrient homeostasis. Although generally considered independently, interactions between hunger and thirst drives are important to coordinate competing needs. In Drosophila, four neurons called the interoceptive subesophageal zone neurons (ISNs) respond to intrinsic hunger and thirst signals to oppositely regulate sucrose and water ingestion. Here, we investigate the neural circuit downstream of the ISNs to examine how ingestion is regulated based on internal needs. Utilizing the recently available fly brain connectome, we find that the ISNs synapse with a novel cell-type bilateral T-shaped neuron (BiT) that projects to neuroendocrine centers. In vivo neural manipulations revealed that BiT oppositely regulates sugar and water ingestion. Neuroendocrine cells downstream of ISNs include several peptide-releasing and peptide-sensing neurons, including insulin producing cells (IPCs), crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) neurons, and CCHamide-2 receptor isoform RA (CCHa2R-RA) neurons. These neurons contribute differentially to ingestion of sugar and water, with IPCs and CCAP neurons oppositely regulating sugar and water ingestion, and CCHa2R-RA neurons modulating only water ingestion. Thus, the decision to consume sugar or water occurs via regulation of a broad peptidergic network that integrates internal signals of nutritional state to generate nutrient-specific ingestion.

    1. Neuroscience
    Lucas Y Tian, Timothy L Warren ... Michael S Brainard
    Research Article

    Complex behaviors depend on the coordinated activity of neural ensembles in interconnected brain areas. The behavioral function of such coordination, often measured as co-fluctuations in neural activity across areas, is poorly understood. One hypothesis is that rapidly varying co-fluctuations may be a signature of moment-by-moment task-relevant influences of one area on another. We tested this possibility for error-corrective adaptation of birdsong, a form of motor learning which has been hypothesized to depend on the top-down influence of a higher-order area, LMAN (lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium), in shaping moment-by-moment output from a primary motor area, RA (robust nucleus of the arcopallium). In paired recordings of LMAN and RA in singing birds, we discovered a neural signature of a top-down influence of LMAN on RA, quantified as an LMAN-leading co-fluctuation in activity between these areas. During learning, this co-fluctuation strengthened in a premotor temporal window linked to the specific movement, sequential context, and acoustic modification associated with learning. Moreover, transient perturbation of LMAN activity specifically within this premotor window caused rapid occlusion of pitch modifications, consistent with LMAN conveying a temporally localized motor-biasing signal. Combined, our results reveal a dynamic top-down influence of LMAN on RA that varies on the rapid timescale of individual movements and is flexibly linked to contexts associated with learning. This finding indicates that inter-area co-fluctuations can be a signature of dynamic top-down influences that support complex behavior and its adaptation.