Abstract

It is widely assumed that our actions shape our brains and that the resulting connections determine who we are. To test this idea in a reductionist setting, in which genes and environment are controlled, we investigated differences in neuroanatomy and structural covariance by ex vivo structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in mice whose behavioral activity was continuously tracked for 3 months in a large, enriched environment. We confirmed that environmental enrichment increases mouse hippocampal volumes. Stratifying the enriched group according to individual longitudinal behavioral trajectories, however, revealed striking differences in mouse brain structural covariance in continuously highly active mice compared to those whose trajectories showed signs of habituating activity. Network-based statistics identified distinct sub-networks of murine structural covariance underlying these differences in behavioral activity. Together, these results reveal that differentiated behavioral trajectories of mice in an enriched environment are associated with differences in brain connectivity.

Data availability

The structural MR images used in this manuscript are publicly available on the OSF platform (https://osf.io/m7gpd/). The volumetric MRI data are found in Supplementary Files 1 (absolute values) and 2 (relative values). The behavioral data from the cage (animal IDs with time-stamped raw antenna contacts) are assessible at Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bzkh189ds

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jadna Bogado Lopes

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anna N Senko

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0885-0440
  3. Klaas Bahnsen

    Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5413-0359
  4. Daniel Geisler

    Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Eugene Kim

    Department of Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0066-7051
  6. Michel Bernanos

    Department of Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Diana Cash

    Department of Neuroimaging, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Stefan Ehrlich

    Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Anthony C Vernon

    Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    anthony.vernon@kcl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7305-1069
  10. Gerd Kempermann

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    gerd.kempermann@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5304-4061

Funding

Helmholtz Association (Basic Funding)

  • Anna N Senko
  • Gerd Kempermann

Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden (Basic Funding)

  • Anna N Senko
  • Gerd Kempermann

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (88881.129646/2016-01)

  • Jadna Bogado Lopes

Joachim Herz Stiftung

  • Jadna Bogado Lopes

Medical Research Council (New Investigator Research Grant MR/N025377/1 (AV); Centre Grant MR/N026063/1)

  • Anthony C Vernon

TransCampus (TransCampus Research Award)

  • Anthony C Vernon
  • Gerd Kempermann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EH 367/7-1)

  • Stefan Ehrlich

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jason P Lerch, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The experiment was conducted in accordance with the applicable European and national regulations and approved by the local authority (Landesdirektion Sachsen, file number 7/2016 TVT DD24 5131-365-8-SAC). All analyses were performed in a blinded manner.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: March 26, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 18, 2022
  3. Accepted: January 13, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 16, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 24, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Bogado Lopes et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,668
    views
  • 292
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jadna Bogado Lopes
  2. Anna N Senko
  3. Klaas Bahnsen
  4. Daniel Geisler
  5. Eugene Kim
  6. Michel Bernanos
  7. Diana Cash
  8. Stefan Ehrlich
  9. Anthony C Vernon
  10. Gerd Kempermann
(2023)
Individual behavioral trajectories shape whole-brain connectivity in mice
eLife 12:e80379.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80379

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80379

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Vezha Boboeva, Alberto Pezzotta ... Athena Akrami
    Research Article

    The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Michael Berger, Michèle Fraatz ... Henrike Scholz
    Research Article

    The brain regulates food intake in response to internal energy demands and food availability. However, can internal energy storage influence the type of memory that is formed? We show that the duration of starvation determines whether Drosophila melanogaster forms appetitive short-term or longer-lasting intermediate memories. The internal glycogen storage in the muscles and adipose tissue influences how intensely sucrose-associated information is stored. Insulin-like signaling in octopaminergic reward neurons integrates internal energy storage into memory formation. Octopamine, in turn, suppresses the formation of long-term memory. Octopamine is not required for short-term memory because octopamine-deficient mutants can form appetitive short-term memory for sucrose and to other nutrients depending on the internal energy status. The reduced positive reinforcing effect of sucrose at high internal glycogen levels, combined with the increased stability of food-related memories due to prolonged periods of starvation, could lead to increased food intake.