Huntingtin recruits KIF1A to transport synaptic vesicle precursors along the mouse axon to support synaptic transmission and motor skill learning

  1. Hélène Vitet
  2. Julie Bruyère
  3. Hao Xu
  4. Claire Séris
  5. Jacques Brocard
  6. Yah-Se Abada
  7. Benoît Delatour
  8. Chiara Scaramuzzino  Is a corresponding author
  9. Laurent Venance
  10. Frédéric Saudou  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université Grenoble Alpes, France
  2. University Grenoble Alpes, France
  3. College de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, France
  4. Sorbonne Université, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR7225, France

Abstract

Neurotransmitters are released at synapses by synaptic vesicles (SVs), which originate from SV precursors (SVPs) that have traveled along the axon. Because each synapse maintains a pool of SVs, only a small fraction of which are released, it has been thought that axonal transport of SVPs does not affect synaptic function. Here, studying the corticostriatal network both in microfluidic devices and in mice, we find that phosphorylation of the Huntingtin protein (HTT) increases axonal transport of SVPs and synaptic glutamate release by recruiting the kinesin motor KIF1A. In mice, constitutive HTT phosphorylation causes SV over-accumulation at synapses, increases the probability of SV release, and impairs motor skill learning on the rotating rod. Silencing KIF1A in these mice restored SV transport and motor skill learning to wild-type levels. Axonal SVP transport within the corticostriatal network thus influences synaptic plasticity and motor skill learning.

Data availability

All datasets generated and analyzed during the study are included in the manuscript and in the supporting files. Source Data files have been provided for Figure 1, Figure 1- Figure Supplement 1, Figure 2, Figure 2- Figure Supplement 2, Figure 3, Figure 3- Figure Supplement 3, Figure 4, Figure 4- Figure Supplement 4, Figure 5, Figure 5- Figure Supplement 5, Figure 6, Figure 6- Figure Supplement 6, Figure 6- Figure Supplement 7, Figure 7, and Figure 8.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hélène Vitet

    INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Julie Bruyère

    INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hao Xu

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, College de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Claire Séris

    INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jacques Brocard

    INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0752-5737
  6. Yah-Se Abada

    Institut du Cerveau, Sorbonne Université, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Benoît Delatour

    Institut du Cerveau, Sorbonne Université, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Chiara Scaramuzzino

    INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    chiara.scaramuzzino@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Laurent Venance

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, College de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0738-1662
  10. Frédéric Saudou

    INSERM U1216, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    frederic.saudou@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6107-1046

Funding

European Research Council (834317)

  • Frédéric Saudou

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-IDEX-02 NeuroCoG)

  • Frédéric Saudou

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE16-0009-01 AXYON)

  • Frédéric Saudou

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM,DEI20151234418)

  • Frédéric Saudou

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (SPF20140129405)

  • Chiara Scaramuzzino

European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 693-2015)

  • Chiara Scaramuzzino

Association Huntington France

  • Hélène Vitet

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201904008035)

  • Hélène Vitet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Inna Slutsky, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were performed in an authorized establishment (Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, INSERM U1216, license #B3851610008) in strict accordance with the directive of the European Community (63/2010/EU). The project was approved by the French Ethical Committee (Authorization number: APAFIS#18126-2018103018299125 v2) for care and use of laboratory animals and performed under the supervision of authorized investigators.

Version history

  1. Received: June 13, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: August 15, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: July 6, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 11, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: July 24, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: July 25, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Vitet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,074
    views
  • 234
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hélène Vitet
  2. Julie Bruyère
  3. Hao Xu
  4. Claire Séris
  5. Jacques Brocard
  6. Yah-Se Abada
  7. Benoît Delatour
  8. Chiara Scaramuzzino
  9. Laurent Venance
  10. Frédéric Saudou
(2023)
Huntingtin recruits KIF1A to transport synaptic vesicle precursors along the mouse axon to support synaptic transmission and motor skill learning
eLife 12:e81011.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81011

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81011

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Shanka Subhra Mondal, Steven Frankland ... Jonathan D Cohen
    Research Article

    Deep neural networks have made tremendous gains in emulating human-like intelligence, and have been used increasingly as ways of understanding how the brain may solve the complex computational problems on which this relies. However, these still fall short of, and therefore fail to provide insight into how the brain supports strong forms of generalization of which humans are capable. One such case is out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization – successful performance on test examples that lie outside the distribution of the training set. Here, we identify properties of processing in the brain that may contribute to this ability. We describe a two-part algorithm that draws on specific features of neural computation to achieve OOD generalization, and provide a proof of concept by evaluating performance on two challenging cognitive tasks. First we draw on the fact that the mammalian brain represents metric spaces using grid cell code (e.g., in the entorhinal cortex): abstract representations of relational structure, organized in recurring motifs that cover the representational space. Second, we propose an attentional mechanism that operates over the grid cell code using determinantal point process (DPP), that we call DPP attention (DPP-A) – a transformation that ensures maximum sparseness in the coverage of that space. We show that a loss function that combines standard task-optimized error with DPP-A can exploit the recurring motifs in the grid cell code, and can be integrated with common architectures to achieve strong OOD generalization performance on analogy and arithmetic tasks. This provides both an interpretation of how the grid cell code in the mammalian brain may contribute to generalization performance, and at the same time a potential means for improving such capabilities in artificial neural networks.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sanggeon Park, Yeowool Huh ... Jeiwon Cho
    Research Article

    The brain’s ability to appraise threats and execute appropriate defensive responses is essential for survival in a dynamic environment. Humans studies have implicated the anterior insular cortex (aIC) in subjective fear regulation and its abnormal activity in fear/anxiety disorders. However, the complex aIC connectivity patterns involved in regulating fear remain under investigated. To address this, we recorded single units in the aIC of freely moving male mice that had previously undergone auditory fear conditioning, assessed the effect of optogenetically activating specific aIC output structures in fear, and examined the organization of aIC neurons projecting to the specific structures with retrograde tracing. Single-unit recordings revealed that a balanced number of aIC pyramidal neurons’ activity either positively or negatively correlated with a conditioned tone-induced freezing (fear) response. Optogenetic manipulations of aIC pyramidal neuronal activity during conditioned tone presentation altered the expression of conditioned freezing. Neural tracing showed that non-overlapping populations of aIC neurons project to the amygdala or the medial thalamus, and the pathway bidirectionally modulated conditioned fear. Specifically, optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-amygdala pathway increased conditioned freezing, while optogenetic stimulation of the aIC-medial thalamus pathway decreased it. Our findings suggest that the balance of freezing-excited and freezing-inhibited neuronal activity in the aIC and the distinct efferent circuits interact collectively to modulate fear behavior.