Rapid reconstruction of neural circuits using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy

  1. Joshua L Lillvis  Is a corresponding author
  2. Hideo Otsuna
  3. Xiaoyu Ding
  4. Igor Pisarev
  5. Takashi Kawase
  6. Jennifer Colonell
  7. Konrad Rokicki
  8. Cristian Goina
  9. Ruixuan Gao
  10. Amy Hu
  11. Kaiyu Wang
  12. John Bogovic
  13. Daniel E Milkie
  14. Linus Meienberg
  15. Brett D Mensh
  16. Edward S Boyden
  17. Stephan Saalfeld
  18. Paul W Tillberg
  19. Barry J Dickson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Janelia Research Campus, United States
  2. University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
  3. ETH Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  5. University of Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Brain function is mediated by the physiological coordination of a vast, intricately connected network of molecular and cellular components. The physiological properties of neural network components can be quantified with high throughput. The ability to assess many animals per study has been critical in relating physiological properties to behavior. By contrast, the synaptic structure of neural circuits is presently quantifiable only with low throughput. This low throughput hampers efforts to understand how variations in network structure relate to variations in behavior. For neuroanatomical reconstruction there is a methodological gulf between electron-microscopic (EM) methods, which yield dense connectomes at considerable expense and low throughput, and light-microscopic (LM) methods, which provide molecular and cell-type specificity at high throughput but without synaptic resolution. To bridge this gulf, we developed a high-throughput analysis pipeline and imaging protocol using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy (ExLLSM) to rapidly reconstruct selected circuits across many animals with single-synapse resolution and molecular contrast. Using Drosophila to validate this approach, we demonstrate that it yields synaptic counts similar to those obtained by EM, enables synaptic connectivity to be compared across sex and experience, and can be used to correlate structural connectivity, functional connectivity, and behavior. This approach fills a critical methodological gap in studying variability in the structure and function of neural circuits across individuals within and between species.

Data availability

All software and code used for data analysis is available at Github (https://github.com/JaneliaSciComp/exllsm-circuit-reconstruction). Ground truth data used to train the synapse classifier is available at Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5hqbzkh8b). All genetic reagents are available upon request. The data used to generate the figures and videos in this manuscript exceeds 100TB. Therefore, it is not practical to upload the data to a public repository. However, all data used in this paper will be made freely available to those who request and provide a mechanism for feasible data transfers (physical hard drives, cloud storage, etc.). Documentation for construction of a lattice light-sheet microscope can be obtained by execution of a research license agreement with HHMI.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joshua L Lillvis

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    For correspondence
    lillvisj@janelia.hhmi.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6235-8759
  2. Hideo Otsuna

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2107-8881
  3. Xiaoyu Ding

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Igor Pisarev

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Takashi Kawase

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jennifer Colonell

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Konrad Rokicki

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2799-9833
  8. Cristian Goina

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2835-7602
  9. Ruixuan Gao

    University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    Ruixuan Gao, is a co-inventor on multiple patents related to expansion microscopy..
  10. Amy Hu

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Kaiyu Wang

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. John Bogovic

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4829-9457
  13. Daniel E Milkie

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Linus Meienberg

    ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6793-1422
  15. Brett D Mensh

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Edward S Boyden

    MIT McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Edward S Boyden, is a co-inventor on multiple patents related to expansion microscopy and is also a co-founder of a company that aims to pursue commercial deployment of expansion microscopy-related technology..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0419-3351
  17. Stephan Saalfeld

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4106-1761
  18. Paul W Tillberg

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    Paul W Tillberg, is a co-inventor on multiple patents related to expansion microscopy..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2568-2365
  19. Barry J Dickson

    Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
    For correspondence
    b.dickson@uq.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Barry J Dickson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Lillvis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,723
    views
  • 639
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Joshua L Lillvis
  2. Hideo Otsuna
  3. Xiaoyu Ding
  4. Igor Pisarev
  5. Takashi Kawase
  6. Jennifer Colonell
  7. Konrad Rokicki
  8. Cristian Goina
  9. Ruixuan Gao
  10. Amy Hu
  11. Kaiyu Wang
  12. John Bogovic
  13. Daniel E Milkie
  14. Linus Meienberg
  15. Brett D Mensh
  16. Edward S Boyden
  17. Stephan Saalfeld
  18. Paul W Tillberg
  19. Barry J Dickson
(2022)
Rapid reconstruction of neural circuits using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy
eLife 11:e81248.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81248

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81248

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sergio Plaza-Alonso, Nicolas Cano-Astorga ... Lidia Alonso-Nanclares
    Research Article Updated

    The entorhinal cortex (EC) plays a pivotal role in memory function and spatial navigation, connecting the hippocampus with the neocortex. The EC integrates a wide range of cortical and subcortical inputs, but its synaptic organization in the human brain is largely unknown. We used volume electron microscopy to perform a 3D analysis of the microanatomical features of synapses in all layers of the medial EC (MEC) from the human brain. Using this technology, 12,974 synapses were fully 3D reconstructed at the ultrastructural level. The MEC presented a distinct set of synaptic features, differentiating this region from other human cortical areas. Furthermore, ultrastructural synaptic characteristics within the MEC was predominantly similar, although layers I and VI exhibited several synaptic characteristics that were distinct from other layers. The present study constitutes an extensive description of the synaptic characteristics of the neuropil of all layers of the EC, a crucial step to better understand the connectivity of this cortical region, in both health and disease.

    1. Neuroscience
    Christopher H Chen, Zhiyi Yao ... Wade G Regehr
    Short Report

    Purkinje cells (PCs) primarily project to cerebellar nuclei but also directly innervate the brainstem. Some PC-brainstem projections have been described previously, but most have not been thoroughly characterized. Here, we use a PC-specific cre line to anatomically and electrophysiologically characterize PC projections to the brainstem. PC synapses are surprisingly widespread, with the highest densities found in the vestibular and parabrachial nuclei. However, there are pronounced regional differences in synaptic densities within both the vestibular and parabrachial nuclei. Large optogenetically evoked PC-IPSCs are preferentially observed in subregions with the highest densities of putative PC boutons, suggesting that PCs selectively influence these areas and the behaviors they regulate. Unexpectedly, the pontine central gray and nearby subnuclei also contained a low density of putative PC boutons, and large PC-IPSCs are observed in a small fraction of cells. We combined electrophysiological recordings with immunohistochemistry to assess the molecular identities of two potential PC targets: PC synapses onto mesencephalic trigeminal neurons were not observed even though these cells are in close proximity to PC boutons; PC synapses onto locus coeruleus neurons are exceedingly rare or absent, even though previous studies concluded that PCs are a major input to these neurons. The availability of a highly selective cre line for PCs allowed us to study functional synapses, while avoiding complications that can accompany the use of viral approaches. We conclude that PCs directly innervate numerous brainstem nuclei, and in many nuclei they strongly inhibit a small fraction of cells. This suggests that PCs selectively target cell types with specific behavioral roles in the brainstem.