Rapid reconstruction of neural circuits using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy

  1. Joshua L Lillvis  Is a corresponding author
  2. Hideo Otsuna
  3. Xiaoyu Ding
  4. Igor Pisarev
  5. Takashi Kawase
  6. Jennifer Colonell
  7. Konrad Rokicki
  8. Cristian Goina
  9. Ruixuan Gao
  10. Amy Hu
  11. Kaiyu Wang
  12. John Bogovic
  13. Daniel E Milkie
  14. Linus Meienberg
  15. Brett D Mensh
  16. Edward S Boyden
  17. Stephan Saalfeld
  18. Paul W Tillberg
  19. Barry J Dickson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Janelia Research Campus, United States
  2. University of Illinois at Chicago, United States
  3. ETH Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  5. University of Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Brain function is mediated by the physiological coordination of a vast, intricately connected network of molecular and cellular components. The physiological properties of neural network components can be quantified with high throughput. The ability to assess many animals per study has been critical in relating physiological properties to behavior. By contrast, the synaptic structure of neural circuits is presently quantifiable only with low throughput. This low throughput hampers efforts to understand how variations in network structure relate to variations in behavior. For neuroanatomical reconstruction there is a methodological gulf between electron-microscopic (EM) methods, which yield dense connectomes at considerable expense and low throughput, and light-microscopic (LM) methods, which provide molecular and cell-type specificity at high throughput but without synaptic resolution. To bridge this gulf, we developed a high-throughput analysis pipeline and imaging protocol using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy (ExLLSM) to rapidly reconstruct selected circuits across many animals with single-synapse resolution and molecular contrast. Using Drosophila to validate this approach, we demonstrate that it yields synaptic counts similar to those obtained by EM, enables synaptic connectivity to be compared across sex and experience, and can be used to correlate structural connectivity, functional connectivity, and behavior. This approach fills a critical methodological gap in studying variability in the structure and function of neural circuits across individuals within and between species.

Data availability

All software and code used for data analysis is available at Github (https://github.com/JaneliaSciComp/exllsm-circuit-reconstruction). Ground truth data used to train the synapse classifier is available at Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5hqbzkh8b). All genetic reagents are available upon request. The data used to generate the figures and videos in this manuscript exceeds 100TB. Therefore, it is not practical to upload the data to a public repository. However, all data used in this paper will be made freely available to those who request and provide a mechanism for feasible data transfers (physical hard drives, cloud storage, etc.). Documentation for construction of a lattice light-sheet microscope can be obtained by execution of a research license agreement with HHMI.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joshua L Lillvis

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    For correspondence
    lillvisj@janelia.hhmi.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6235-8759
  2. Hideo Otsuna

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2107-8881
  3. Xiaoyu Ding

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Igor Pisarev

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Takashi Kawase

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jennifer Colonell

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Konrad Rokicki

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2799-9833
  8. Cristian Goina

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2835-7602
  9. Ruixuan Gao

    University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    Ruixuan Gao, is a co-inventor on multiple patents related to expansion microscopy..
  10. Amy Hu

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Kaiyu Wang

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. John Bogovic

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4829-9457
  13. Daniel E Milkie

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Linus Meienberg

    ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6793-1422
  15. Brett D Mensh

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Edward S Boyden

    MIT McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Edward S Boyden, is a co-inventor on multiple patents related to expansion microscopy and is also a co-founder of a company that aims to pursue commercial deployment of expansion microscopy-related technology..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0419-3351
  17. Stephan Saalfeld

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4106-1761
  18. Paul W Tillberg

    Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    Paul W Tillberg, is a co-inventor on multiple patents related to expansion microscopy..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2568-2365
  19. Barry J Dickson

    Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
    For correspondence
    b.dickson@uq.edu.au
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Barry J Dickson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Lillvis et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,582
    views
  • 630
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Joshua L Lillvis
  2. Hideo Otsuna
  3. Xiaoyu Ding
  4. Igor Pisarev
  5. Takashi Kawase
  6. Jennifer Colonell
  7. Konrad Rokicki
  8. Cristian Goina
  9. Ruixuan Gao
  10. Amy Hu
  11. Kaiyu Wang
  12. John Bogovic
  13. Daniel E Milkie
  14. Linus Meienberg
  15. Brett D Mensh
  16. Edward S Boyden
  17. Stephan Saalfeld
  18. Paul W Tillberg
  19. Barry J Dickson
(2022)
Rapid reconstruction of neural circuits using tissue expansion and light sheet microscopy
eLife 11:e81248.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81248

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81248

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sam E Benezra, Kripa B Patel ... Randy M Bruno
    Research Article

    Learning alters cortical representations and improves perception. Apical tuft dendrites in cortical layer 1, which are unique in their connectivity and biophysical properties, may be a key site of learning-induced plasticity. We used both two-photon and SCAPE microscopy to longitudinally track tuft-wide calcium spikes in apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in barrel cortex as mice learned a tactile behavior. Mice were trained to discriminate two orthogonal directions of whisker stimulation. Reinforcement learning, but not repeated stimulus exposure, enhanced tuft selectivity for both directions equally, even though only one was associated with reward. Selective tufts emerged from initially unresponsive or low-selectivity populations. Animal movement and choice did not account for changes in stimulus selectivity. Enhanced selectivity persisted even after rewards were removed and animals ceased performing the task. We conclude that learning produces long-lasting realignment of apical dendrite tuft responses to behaviorally relevant dimensions of a task.

    1. Neuroscience
    Rongxin Fang, Aaron Halpern ... Xiaowei Zhuang
    Tools and Resources

    Multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) allows genome-scale imaging of RNAs in individual cells in intact tissues. To date, MERFISH has been applied to image thin-tissue samples of ~10 µm thickness. Here, we present a thick-tissue three-dimensional (3D) MERFISH imaging method, which uses confocal microscopy for optical sectioning, deep learning for increasing imaging speed and quality, as well as sample preparation and imaging protocol optimized for thick samples. We demonstrated 3D MERFISH on mouse brain tissue sections of up to 200 µm thickness with high detection efficiency and accuracy. We anticipate that 3D thick-tissue MERFISH imaging will broaden the scope of questions that can be addressed by spatial genomics.