Mammalian forelimb evolution is driven by uneven proximal-to-distal morphological diversity

  1. Priscila S Rothier  Is a corresponding author
  2. Anne-Claire Fabre
  3. Julien Clavel
  4. Roger BJ Benson
  5. Anthony Herrel
  1. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, France
  2. Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Switzerland
  3. Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, UMR 5023, France
  4. University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Vertebrate limb morphology often reflects the environment due to variation in locomotor requirements. However, proximal and distal limb segments may evolve differently from one another, reflecting an anatomical gradient of functional specialization that has been suggested to be impacted by the timing of development. Here we explore whether the temporal sequence of bone condensation predicts variation in the capacity of evolution to generate morphological diversity in proximal and distal forelimb segments across more than 600 species of mammals. Distal elements not only exhibit greater shape diversity, but also show stronger within-element integration and, on average, faster evolutionary responses than intermediate and upper limb segments. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that late developing distal bones display greater morphological variation than more proximal limb elements. However, the higher integration observed within the autopod deviates from such developmental predictions, suggesting that functional specialization plays an important role in driving within-element covariation. Proximal and distal limb segments also show different macroevolutionary patterns, albeit not showing a perfect proximo-distal gradient. The high disparity of the mammalian autopod, reported here, is consistent with the higher potential of development to generate variation in more distal limb structures, as well as functional specialization of the distal elements.

Data availability

Morphometric data and R codes are available on Dryad (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.0cfxpnw6h)

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Priscila S Rothier

    Département Adaptations du Vivant, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    priscilasrd@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3017-6528
  2. Anne-Claire Fabre

    Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, Bern, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Julien Clavel

    Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, UMR 5023, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Roger BJ Benson

    Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anthony Herrel

    Département Adaptations du Vivant, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (204841/2018-6)

  • Priscila S Rothier

European Research Council (2015-STG-677774)

  • Roger BJ Benson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Rothier et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,410
    views
  • 421
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Priscila S Rothier
  2. Anne-Claire Fabre
  3. Julien Clavel
  4. Roger BJ Benson
  5. Anthony Herrel
(2023)
Mammalian forelimb evolution is driven by uneven proximal-to-distal morphological diversity
eLife 12:e81492.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81492

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81492

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Asher D Cutter
    Review Article

    Haldane’s rule occupies a special place in biology as one of the few ‘rules’ of speciation, with empirical support from hundreds of species. And yet, its classic purview is restricted taxonomically to the subset of organisms with heteromorphic sex chromosomes. I propose explicit acknowledgement of generalized hypotheses about Haldane’s rule that frame sex bias in hybrid dysfunction broadly and irrespective of the sexual system. The consensus view of classic Haldane’s rule holds that sex-biased hybrid dysfunction across taxa is a composite phenomenon that requires explanations from multiple causes. Testing of the multiple alternative hypotheses for Haldane’s rule is, in many cases, applicable to taxa with homomorphic sex chromosomes, environmental sex determination, haplodiploidy, and hermaphroditism. Integration of a variety of biological phenomena about hybrids across diverse sexual systems, beyond classic Haldane’s rule, will help to derive a more general understanding of the contributing forces and mechanisms that lead to predictable sex biases in evolutionary divergence and speciation.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Zofia Dubicka, Jarosław Tyszka ... Ulf Bickmeyer
    Research Article

    Living organisms control the formation of mineral skeletons and other structures through biomineralization. Major phylogenetic groups usually consistently follow a single biomineralization pathway. Foraminifera, which are very efficient marine calcifiers, making a substantial contribution to global carbonate production and global carbon sequestration, are regarded as an exception. This phylum has been commonly thought to follow two contrasting models of either in situ ‘mineralization of extracellular matrix’ attributed to hyaline rotaliid shells, or ‘mineralization within intracellular vesicles’ attributed to porcelaneous miliolid shells. Our previous results on rotaliids along with those on miliolids in this paper question such a wide divergence of biomineralization pathways within the same phylum of Foraminifera. We have found under a high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) that precipitation of high-Mg calcitic mesocrystals in porcelaneous shells takes place in situ and form a dense, chaotic meshwork of needle-like crystallites. We have not observed calcified needles that already precipitated in the transported vesicles, what challenges the previous model of miliolid mineralization. Hence, Foraminifera probably utilize less divergent calcification pathways, following the recently discovered biomineralization principles. Mesocrystalline chamber walls in both models are therefore most likely created by intravesicular accumulation of pre-formed liquid amorphous mineral phase deposited and crystallized within the extracellular organic matrix enclosed in a biologically controlled privileged space by active pseudopodial structures. Both calcification pathways evolved independently in the Paleozoic and are well conserved in two clades that represent different chamber formation modes.