Spatiotemporal properties of glutamate input support direction selectivity in the dendrites of retinal starburst amacrine cells

Abstract

The asymmetric summation of kinetically distinct glutamate inputs across the dendrites of retinal 'starburst' amacrine cells is one of the several mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie their direction-selective properties, but experimentally verifying input kinetics has been a challenge. Here, we used two-photon glutamate sensor (iGluSnFR) imaging to directly measure the input kinetics across individual starburst dendrites. We found that signals measured from proximal dendrites were relatively sustained compared to those measured from distal dendrites. These differences were observed across a range of stimulus sizes and appeared to be shaped mainly by excitatory rather than inhibitory network interactions. Temporal deconvolution analysis suggests that the steady-state vesicle release rate was ~ 3 times larger at proximal sites compared to distal sites. Using a connectomics-inspired computational model, we demonstrate that input kinetics play an important role in shaping direction selectivity at low stimulus velocities. Together, these results provide direct support for the 'space-time wiring' model for direction selectivity.

Data availability

Source data provided

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Prerna Srivastava

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Geoff deRosenroll

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5431-2814
  3. Akihiro Matsumoto

    Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tracy Michaels

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zachary Turple

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Varsha Jain

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Santhosh Sethuramanujam

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Benjamin L Murphy-Baum

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6746-3091
  9. Keisuke Yonehara

    Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani

    Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
    For correspondence
    gautam@uvic.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0610-5271

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (159444)

  • Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani

European Research Council (638730)

  • Keisuke Yonehara

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care and approved by the University of Victoria's Animal Care Committee, or in accordance with Danish standard ethical guidelines and were approved by the Danish National Animal Experiment Committee (Permission No. 2015-15-0201-00541; 2020-15-0201-00452).

Copyright

© 2022, Srivastava et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,126
    views
  • 179
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Prerna Srivastava
  2. Geoff deRosenroll
  3. Akihiro Matsumoto
  4. Tracy Michaels
  5. Zachary Turple
  6. Varsha Jain
  7. Santhosh Sethuramanujam
  8. Benjamin L Murphy-Baum
  9. Keisuke Yonehara
  10. Gautam Bhagwan Awatramani
(2022)
Spatiotemporal properties of glutamate input support direction selectivity in the dendrites of retinal starburst amacrine cells
eLife 11:e81533.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81533

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81533

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Shuo Zhang, Yan Tian ... Haiyan Wu
    Research Article

    Active inference integrates perception, decision-making, and learning into a united theoretical framework, providing an efficient way to trade off exploration and exploitation by minimizing (expected) free energy. In this study, we asked how the brain represents values and uncertainties (novelty and variability), and resolves these uncertainties under the active inference framework in the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Twenty-five participants performed a contextual two-armed bandit task, with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By comparing the model evidence for active inference and reinforcement learning models of choice behavior, we show that active inference better explains human decision-making under novelty and variability, which entails exploration or information seeking. The EEG sensor-level results show that the activity in the frontal, central, and parietal regions is associated with novelty, while the activity in the frontal and central brain regions is associated with variability. The EEG source-level results indicate that the expected free energy is encoded in the frontal pole and middle frontal gyrus and uncertainties are encoded in different brain regions but with overlap. Our study dissociates the expected free energy and uncertainties in active inference theory and their neural correlates, speaking to the construct validity of active inference in characterizing cognitive processes of human decisions. It provides behavioral and neural evidence of active inference in decision processes and insights into the neural mechanism of human decisions under uncertainties.

    1. Neuroscience
    Myrthe Faber, Koen V Haak
    Insight

    Untangling the functional organisation of a brain region crucial for memory and learning helps reveal how individual differences are linked to variations in recall ability, aging and dopamine receptor distribution.