Response outcome gates the effect of spontaneous cortical state fluctuations on perceptual decisions

Abstract

Sensory responses of cortical neurons are more discriminable when evoked on a baseline of desynchronized spontaneous activity, but cortical desynchronization has not generally been associated with more accurate perceptual decisions. Here we show that mice perform more accurate auditory judgements when activity in the auditory cortex is elevated and desynchronized before stimulus onset, but only if the previous trial was an error, and that this relationship is occluded if previous outcome is ignored. We confirmed that the outcome-dependent effect of brain state on performance is neither due to idiosyncratic associations between the slow components of either signal, nor to the existence of specific cortical states evident only after errors. Instead, errors appear to gate the effect of cortical state fluctuations on discrimination accuracy. Neither facial movements nor pupil size during the baseline were associated with accuracy, but they were predictive of measures of responsivity, such as the probability of not responding to the stimulus or of responding prematurely. These results suggest that the functional role of cortical state on behavior is dynamic and constantly regulated by performance monitoring systems.

Data availability

All data and code necessary to reproduce the main findings of this manuscript are deposited on Dryad (https://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.w0vt4b8vf).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Davide Reato

    Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
    For correspondence
    davide.reato@neuro.fchampalimaud.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5362-4616
  2. Raphael Steinfeld

    Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. André Tacão-Monteiro

    Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alfonso Renart

    Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
    For correspondence
    alfonso.renart@neuro.fchampalimaud.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7916-9930

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Postdoctoral fellowship,SFRH/BPD/119737/2016)

  • Davide Reato

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (Postdoctoral fellowship,H2020-MSCA-IF-2016 75381)

  • Davide Reato

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Doctoral fellowships)

  • Raphael Steinfeld

Fundação Champalimaud

  • Alfonso Renart

Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (PCIG11-GA-2012-322339)

  • Alfonso Renart

Human Frontier Science Program (Young Investigator Award,RGY0089)

  • Alfonso Renart

EU FP7 (ICT-2011-9-600925)

  • Alfonso Renart

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jonas Obleser, University of Lübeck, Germany

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown animalwelfare committee and approved by the Portuguese Direção Geral de Veterinária (Ref. No.6090421/000/000/2019).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 3, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: July 11, 2022
  3. Accepted: May 16, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: May 17, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: May 19, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: June 5, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Reato et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 591
    views
  • 80
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Davide Reato
  2. Raphael Steinfeld
  3. André Tacão-Monteiro
  4. Alfonso Renart
(2023)
Response outcome gates the effect of spontaneous cortical state fluctuations on perceptual decisions
eLife 12:e81774.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81774

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81774

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Flavio J Schmidig, Simon Ruch, Katharina Henke
    Research Article

    We are unresponsive during slow-wave sleep but continue monitoring external events for survival. Our brain wakens us when danger is imminent. If events are non-threatening, our brain might store them for later consideration to improve decision-making. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether novel vocabulary consisting of simultaneously played pseudowords and translation words are encoded/stored during sleep, and which neural-electrical events facilitate encoding/storage. An algorithm for brain-state-dependent stimulation selectively targeted word pairs to slow-wave peaks or troughs. Retrieval tests were given 12 and 36 hr later. These tests required decisions regarding the semantic category of previously sleep-played pseudowords. The sleep-played vocabulary influenced awake decision-making 36 hr later, if targeted to troughs. The words’ linguistic processing raised neural complexity. The words’ semantic-associative encoding was supported by increased theta power during the ensuing peak. Fast-spindle power ramped up during a second peak likely aiding consolidation. Hence, new vocabulary played during slow-wave sleep was stored and influenced decision-making days later.