MCT1-dependent energetic failure and neuroinflammation underlie optic nerve degeneration in Wolfram syndrome mice

Abstract

Wolfram syndrome 1 (WS1) is a rare genetic disorder caused by mutations in the WFS1 gene leading to a wide spectrum of clinical dysfunctions, among which blindness, diabetes and neurological deficits are the most prominent. WFS1 encodes for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident transmembrane protein wolframin with multiple functions in ER processes. However, the WFS1-dependent etiopathology in retinal cells is unknown. Herein, we showed that Wfs1 mutant mice developed early retinal electrophysiological impairments followed by marked visual loss. Interestingly, axons and myelin disruption in the optic nerve preceded the degeneration of the retinal ganglion cell bodies in the retina. Transcriptomics at pre-degenerative stage revealed the STAT3-dependent activation of proinflammatory glial markers with reduction of the homeostatic and pro-survival factors glutamine synthetase and BDNF. Furthermore, label-free comparative proteomics identified a significant reduction of the monocarboxylate transport isoform 1 (MCT1) and its partner basigin that are highly enriched on retinal glia and myelin-forming oligodendrocytes in optic nerve together with wolframin. Loss of MCT1 caused a failure in lactate transfer from glial to neuronal cell bodies and axons leading to a chronic hypometabolic state. Thus, this bioenergetic impairment is occurring concurrently both within the axonal regions and cell bodies of the retinal ganglion cells, selectively endangering their survival while impacting less on other retinal cells. This metabolic dysfunction occurs months before the frank RGC degeneration suggesting an extended time-window for intervening with new therapeutic strategies focused on boosting retinal and optic nerve bioenergetics in WS1.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE42357.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Greta Rossi

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Gabriele Ordazzo

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1850-0375
  3. Niccolò N Vanni

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Valerio Castoldi

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Angelo Iannielli

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Dario Di Silvestre

    Institute of Technologies in Biomedicine, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Edoardo Bellini

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9766-7685
  8. Letizia Bernardo

    Institute of Technologies in Biomedicine, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Serena Giannelli

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mirko Luoni

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5006-1827
  11. Sharon Muggeo

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7135-9780
  12. Leocani Letizia

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. PierLuigi Mauri

    Institute of Technologies in Biomedicine, Milano, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Vania Broccoli

    Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
    For correspondence
    broccoli.vania@hsr.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4050-0926

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health (RF2019-12370396)

  • PierLuigi Mauri

Elixir Implementation Study Proteomics 2021-23 (EISP-23-072)

  • PierLuigi Mauri

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Rossi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,296
    views
  • 195
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Greta Rossi
  2. Gabriele Ordazzo
  3. Niccolò N Vanni
  4. Valerio Castoldi
  5. Angelo Iannielli
  6. Dario Di Silvestre
  7. Edoardo Bellini
  8. Letizia Bernardo
  9. Serena Giannelli
  10. Mirko Luoni
  11. Sharon Muggeo
  12. Leocani Letizia
  13. PierLuigi Mauri
  14. Vania Broccoli
(2023)
MCT1-dependent energetic failure and neuroinflammation underlie optic nerve degeneration in Wolfram syndrome mice
eLife 12:e81779.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81779

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81779

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Elise S Bruguera, Jacob P Mahoney, William I Weis
    Research Article

    Wnt/β-catenin signaling directs animal development and tissue renewal in a tightly controlled, cell- and tissue-specific manner. In the mammalian central nervous system, the atypical ligand Norrin controls angiogenesis and maintenance of the blood-brain barrier and blood-retina barrier through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Like Wnt, Norrin activates signaling by binding and heterodimerizing the receptors Frizzled (Fzd) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6 (LRP5/6), leading to membrane recruitment of the intracellular transducer Dishevelled (Dvl) and ultimately stabilizing the transcriptional coactivator β-catenin. Unlike Wnt, the cystine knot ligand Norrin only signals through Fzd4 and additionally requires the co-receptor Tetraspanin12 (Tspan12); however, the mechanism underlying Tspan12-mediated signal enhancement is unclear. It has been proposed that Tspan12 integrates into the Norrin-Fzd4 complex to enhance Norrin-Fzd4 affinity or otherwise allosterically modulate Fzd4 signaling. Here, we measure direct, high-affinity binding between purified Norrin and Tspan12 in a lipid environment and use AlphaFold models to interrogate this interaction interface. We find that Tspan12 and Fzd4 can simultaneously bind Norrin and that a pre-formed Tspan12/Fzd4 heterodimer, as well as cells co-expressing Tspan12 and Fzd4, more efficiently capture low concentrations of Norrin than Fzd4 alone. We also show that Tspan12 competes with both heparan sulfate proteoglycans and LRP6 for Norrin binding and that Tspan12 does not impact Fzd4-Dvl affinity in the presence or absence of Norrin. Our findings suggest that Tspan12 does not allosterically enhance Fzd4 binding to Norrin or Dvl, but instead functions to directly capture Norrin upstream of signaling.