Neuronal glutamate transporters control reciprocal inhibition and gain modulation in D1 medium spiny neurons

Abstract

Understanding the function of glutamate transporters has broad implications for explaining how neurons integrate information and relay it through complex neuronal circuits. Most of what is currently known about glutamate transporters, specifically their ability to maintain glutamate homeostasis and limit glutamate diffusion away from the synaptic cleft, is based on studies of glial glutamate transporters. By contrast, little is known about the functional implications of neuronal glutamate transporters. The neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 is widely expressed throughout the brain, particularly in the striatum, the primary input nucleus of the basal ganglia, a region implicated with movement execution and reward. Here, we show that EAAC1 limits synaptic excitation onto a population of striatal medium spiny neurons identified for their expression of D1 dopamine receptors (D1-MSNs). In these cells, EAAC1 also contributes to strengthen lateral inhibition from other D1-MSNs. Together, these effects contribute to reduce the gain of the input-output relationship and increase the offset at increasing levels of synaptic inhibition in D1-MSNs. By reducing the sensitivity and dynamic range of action potential firing in D1-MSNs, EAAC1 limits the propensity of mice to rapidly switch between behaviors associated with different reward probabilities. Together, these findings shed light on some important molecular and cellular mechanisms implicated with behavior flexibility in mice.

Data availability

All primary data used in this work and complete statistical analyses for each figure have been deposited to the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dw5n7/).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maurice A Petroccione

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lianna Y D'Brant

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nurat Affinnih

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4203-6410
  4. Patrick H Wehrle

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gabrielle C Todd

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shergil Zahid

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Haley E Chesbro

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ian L Tschang

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Annalisa Scimemi

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    For correspondence
    scimemia@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4975-093X

Funding

National Science Foundation (IOS1655365)

  • Annalisa Scimemi

National Science Foundation (IOS2011998)

  • Annalisa Scimemi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the State University of New York (SUNY) Albany and guidelines described in the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Copyright

© 2023, Petroccione et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 668
    views
  • 130
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maurice A Petroccione
  2. Lianna Y D'Brant
  3. Nurat Affinnih
  4. Patrick H Wehrle
  5. Gabrielle C Todd
  6. Shergil Zahid
  7. Haley E Chesbro
  8. Ian L Tschang
  9. Annalisa Scimemi
(2023)
Neuronal glutamate transporters control reciprocal inhibition and gain modulation in D1 medium spiny neurons
eLife 12:e81830.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81830

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81830

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kazuya Ono, Amandine Jarysta ... Basile Tarchini
    Research Article

    Otolith organs in the inner ear and neuromasts in the fish lateral-line harbor two populations of hair cells oriented to detect stimuli in opposing directions. The underlying mechanism is highly conserved: the transcription factor EMX2 is regionally expressed in just one hair cell population and acts through the receptor GPR156 to reverse cell orientation relative to the other population. In mouse and zebrafish, loss of Emx2 results in sensory organs that harbor only one hair cell orientation and are not innervated properly. In zebrafish, Emx2 also confers hair cells with reduced mechanosensory properties. Here, we leverage mouse and zebrafish models lacking GPR156 to determine how detecting stimuli of opposing directions serves vestibular function, and whether GPR156 has other roles besides orienting hair cells. We find that otolith organs in Gpr156 mouse mutants have normal zonal organization and normal type I-II hair cell distribution and mechano-electrical transduction properties. In contrast, gpr156 zebrafish mutants lack the smaller mechanically evoked signals that characterize Emx2-positive hair cells. Loss of GPR156 does not affect orientation-selectivity of afferents in mouse utricle or zebrafish neuromasts. Consistent with normal otolith organ anatomy and afferent selectivity, Gpr156 mutant mice do not show overt vestibular dysfunction. Instead, performance on two tests that engage otolith organs is significantly altered – swimming and off-vertical-axis rotation. We conclude that GPR156 relays hair cell orientation and transduction information downstream of EMX2, but not selectivity for direction-specific afferents. These results clarify how molecular mechanisms that confer bi-directionality to sensory organs contribute to function, from single hair cell physiology to animal behavior.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jiayun Xu, Mauricio Girardi-Schappo ... Leonard Maler
    Research Article

    Animals navigate by learning the spatial layout of their environment. We investigated spatial learning of mice in an open maze where food was hidden in one of a hundred holes. Mice leaving from a stable entrance learned to efficiently navigate to the food without the need for landmarks. We developed a quantitative framework to reveal how the mice estimate the food location based on analyses of trajectories and active hole checks. After learning, the computed ‘target estimation vector’ (TEV) closely approximated the mice’s route and its hole check distribution. The TEV required learning both the direction and distance of the start to food vector, and our data suggests that different learning dynamics underlie these estimates. We propose that the TEV can be precisely connected to the properties of hippocampal place cells. Finally, we provide the first demonstration that, after learning the location of two food sites, the mice took a shortcut between the sites, demonstrating that they had generated a cognitive map.