Neuronal glutamate transporters control reciprocal inhibition and gain modulation in D1 medium spiny neurons

Abstract

Understanding the function of glutamate transporters has broad implications for explaining how neurons integrate information and relay it through complex neuronal circuits. Most of what is currently known about glutamate transporters, specifically their ability to maintain glutamate homeostasis and limit glutamate diffusion away from the synaptic cleft, is based on studies of glial glutamate transporters. By contrast, little is known about the functional implications of neuronal glutamate transporters. The neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 is widely expressed throughout the brain, particularly in the striatum, the primary input nucleus of the basal ganglia, a region implicated with movement execution and reward. Here, we show that EAAC1 limits synaptic excitation onto a population of striatal medium spiny neurons identified for their expression of D1 dopamine receptors (D1-MSNs). In these cells, EAAC1 also contributes to strengthen lateral inhibition from other D1-MSNs. Together, these effects contribute to reduce the gain of the input-output relationship and increase the offset at increasing levels of synaptic inhibition in D1-MSNs. By reducing the sensitivity and dynamic range of action potential firing in D1-MSNs, EAAC1 limits the propensity of mice to rapidly switch between behaviors associated with different reward probabilities. Together, these findings shed light on some important molecular and cellular mechanisms implicated with behavior flexibility in mice.

Data availability

All primary data used in this work and complete statistical analyses for each figure have been deposited to the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dw5n7/).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maurice A Petroccione

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lianna Y D'Brant

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nurat Affinnih

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4203-6410
  4. Patrick H Wehrle

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gabrielle C Todd

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shergil Zahid

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Haley E Chesbro

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ian L Tschang

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Annalisa Scimemi

    Department of Biology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, United States
    For correspondence
    scimemia@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4975-093X

Funding

National Science Foundation (IOS1655365)

  • Annalisa Scimemi

National Science Foundation (IOS2011998)

  • Annalisa Scimemi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Erin Calipari, Vanderbilt University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the State University of New York (SUNY) Albany and guidelines described in the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Version history

  1. Received: July 13, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: July 14, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: July 9, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 12, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 9, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: August 17, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Petroccione et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 563
    views
  • 121
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maurice A Petroccione
  2. Lianna Y D'Brant
  3. Nurat Affinnih
  4. Patrick H Wehrle
  5. Gabrielle C Todd
  6. Shergil Zahid
  7. Haley E Chesbro
  8. Ian L Tschang
  9. Annalisa Scimemi
(2023)
Neuronal glutamate transporters control reciprocal inhibition and gain modulation in D1 medium spiny neurons
eLife 12:e81830.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81830

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81830

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Paula Banca, Maria Herrojo Ruiz ... Trevor W Robbins
    Research Article

    This study investigates the goal/habit imbalance theory of compulsion in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), which postulates enhanced habit formation, increased automaticity, and impaired goal/habit arbitration. It directly tests these hypotheses using newly developed behavioral tasks. First, OCD patients and healthy participants were trained daily for a month using a smartphone app to perform chunked action sequences. Despite similar procedural learning and attainment of habitual performance (measured by an objective automaticity criterion) by both groups, OCD patients self-reported higher subjective habitual tendencies via a recently developed questionnaire. Subsequently, in a re-evaluation task assessing choices between established automatic and novel goal-directed actions, both groups were sensitive to re-evaluation based on monetary feedback. However, OCD patients, especially those with higher compulsive symptoms and habitual tendencies, showed a clear preference for trained/habitual sequences when choices were based on physical effort, possibly due to their higher attributed intrinsic value. These patients also used the habit-training app more extensively and reported symptom relief post-study. The tendency to attribute higher intrinsic value to familiar actions may be a potential mechanism leading to compulsions and an important addition to the goal/habit imbalance hypothesis in OCD. We also highlight the potential of smartphone app training as a habit reversal therapeutic tool.

    1. Neuroscience
    Taicheng Huang, Jia Liu
    Research Article

    The fact that objects without proper support will fall to the ground is not only a natural phenomenon, but also common sense in mind. Previous studies suggest that humans may infer objects’ stability through a world model that performs mental simulations with a priori knowledge of gravity acting upon the objects. Here we measured participants’ sensitivity to gravity to investigate how the world model works. We found that the world model on gravity was not a faithful replica of the physical laws, but instead encoded gravity’s vertical direction as a Gaussian distribution. The world model with this stochastic feature fit nicely with participants’ subjective sense of objects’ stability and explained the illusion that taller objects are perceived as more likely to fall. Furthermore, a computational model with reinforcement learning revealed that the stochastic characteristic likely originated from experience-dependent comparisons between predictions formed by internal simulations and the realities observed in the external world, which illustrated the ecological advantage of stochastic representation in balancing accuracy and speed for efficient stability inference. The stochastic world model on gravity provides an example of how a priori knowledge of the physical world is implemented in mind that helps humans operate flexibly in open-ended environments.