Abstract

Amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) regulates neuronal activity through the release of secreted APP (sAPP) acting at cell-surface receptors. APP and sAPP were reported to bind to the extracellular sushi domain 1 (SD1) of GABAB receptors (GBRs). A 17 amino-acid peptide (APP17) derived from APP was sufficient for SD1 binding and shown to mimic the inhibitory effect of sAPP on neurotransmitter release and neuronal activity. The functional effects of APP17 and sAPP were similar to those of the GBR agonist baclofen and blocked by a GBR antagonist. These experiments led to the proposal that sAPP activates GBRs to exert its neuronal effects. However, whether APP17 and sAPP influence classical GBR signaling pathways in heterologous cells was not analyzed. Here, we confirm that APP17 binds to GBRs with nanomolar affinity. However, biochemical and electrophysiological experiments indicate that APP17 does not influence GBR activity in heterologous cells. Moreover, APP17 did not regulate synaptic GBR localization, GBR-activated K+ currents, neurotransmitter release or neuronal activity in vitro or in vivo. Our results show that APP17 is not a functional GBR ligand and indicate that sAPP exerts its neuronal effects through receptors other than GBRs.

Data availability

For all figures, numerical data that are represented in graphs are provided as source data excel files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pascal Dominic Rem

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Vita Sereikaite

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Diego Fernández-Fernández

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1431-3705
  4. Sebastian Reinartz

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Daniel Ulrich

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Thorsten Fritzius

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3597-6623
  7. Luca Trovo

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Salomé Roux

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6106-4863
  9. Ziyang Chen

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Philippe Rondard

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1134-2738
  11. Jean-Philippe Pin

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jochen Schwenk

    BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3664-9795
  13. Bernd Fakler

    Institute of Physiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Martin Gassmann

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Tania Rinaldi Barkat

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8650-0986
  16. Kristian Strømgaard

    Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    Kristian Strømgaard, is a co-founder and a part time employee of Avilex Pharma.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2206-4737
  17. Bernhard Bettler

    Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    bernhard.bettler@unibas.ch
    Competing interests
    Bernhard Bettler, is a member of the scientific advisory board of Addex Therapeutics, Geneva..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0842-8207

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A-152970)

  • Bernhard Bettler

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Grant,30389)

  • Sebastian Reinartz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the veterinary office of the canton of Basel-Stadt, Switzerland (animal license numbers: 1897_31476 and 3004_34045).

Copyright

© 2023, Rem et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,287
    views
  • 208
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pascal Dominic Rem
  2. Vita Sereikaite
  3. Diego Fernández-Fernández
  4. Sebastian Reinartz
  5. Daniel Ulrich
  6. Thorsten Fritzius
  7. Luca Trovo
  8. Salomé Roux
  9. Ziyang Chen
  10. Philippe Rondard
  11. Jean-Philippe Pin
  12. Jochen Schwenk
  13. Bernd Fakler
  14. Martin Gassmann
  15. Tania Rinaldi Barkat
  16. Kristian Strømgaard
  17. Bernhard Bettler
(2023)
Soluble amyloid-β precursor peptide does not regulate GABAB receptor activity
eLife 12:e82082.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82082

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82082

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Masahiro Takigawa, Marta Huelin Gorriz ... Daniel Bendor
    Research Article

    During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mohsen Alavash
    Insight

    Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.