Abstract

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) secretes antibacterial effectors into target competitors. Salmonella spp. encode five phylogenetically distinct T6SSs. Here we characterize the function of the SPI-22 T6SS of Salmonella bongori showing that it has antibacterial activity and identify a group of antibacterial T6SS effectors (TseV1-4) containing an N-terminal PAAR-like domain and a C-terminal VRR-Nuc domain encoded next to cognate immunity proteins with a DUF3396 domain (TsiV1-4). TseV2 and TseV3 are toxic when expressed in Escherichia coli and bacterial competition assays confirm that TseV2 and TseV3 are secreted by the SPI-22 T6SS. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that TseV1-4 are evolutionarily related to enzymes involved in DNA repair. TseV3 recognizes specific DNA structures and preferentially cleave splayed arms, generating DNA double-strand breaks and inducing the SOS response in target cells. The crystal structure of the TseV3:TsiV3 complex reveals that the immunity protein likely blocks the effector interaction with the DNA substrate. These results expand our knowledge on the function of Salmonella pathogenicity islands, the evolution of toxins used in biological conflicts, and the endogenous mechanisms regulating the activity of these toxins.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julia Takuno Hespanhol

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel Enrique Sanchez-Limache

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1364-7527
  3. Gianlucca Gonçalves Nicastro

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Liam Mead

    Department of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Edgar Enrique Llontop

    Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4910-9667
  6. Gustavo Chagas-Santos

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chuck Shaker Farah

    Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Robson Francisco de Souza

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5284-4630
  9. Rodrigo da Silva Galhardo

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5686-9704
  10. Andrew Lovering

    Department of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ethel Bayer-Santos

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    For correspondence
    ebayersantos@usp.br
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3832-3449

Funding

Sao Paulo Research foundation (2016/09047-8)

  • Robson Francisco de Souza

FAPESP Fellowship (2018/04553-8)

  • Ethel Bayer-Santos

MIBTP Studentship

  • Liam Mead

Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2017/17303-7)

  • Chuck Shaker Farah

Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2017/02178-2)

  • Ethel Bayer-Santos

Welcome Trust (209437/Z/17/Z)

  • Andrew Lovering

FAPESP Fellowship (2018/25316-4)

  • Julia Takuno Hespanhol

FAPESP Fellowship (2019/22715-8)

  • Daniel Enrique Sanchez-Limache

FAPESP Fellowship (2021/03400-6)

  • Gianlucca Gonçalves Nicastro

FAPESP Fellowship (2019/12234-2)

  • Edgar Enrique Llontop

FAPESP Fellowship (2020/15389-4)

  • Gustavo Chagas-Santos

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Hespanhol et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,803
    views
  • 489
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julia Takuno Hespanhol
  2. Daniel Enrique Sanchez-Limache
  3. Gianlucca Gonçalves Nicastro
  4. Liam Mead
  5. Edgar Enrique Llontop
  6. Gustavo Chagas-Santos
  7. Chuck Shaker Farah
  8. Robson Francisco de Souza
  9. Rodrigo da Silva Galhardo
  10. Andrew Lovering
  11. Ethel Bayer-Santos
(2022)
Antibacterial T6SS effectors with a VRR-Nuc domain are structure-specific nucleases
eLife 11:e82437.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82437

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82437

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Tao Tang, Weiming Zhong ... Zhipeng Gao
    Research Article

    Saprolegnia parasitica is one of the most virulent oomycete species in freshwater aquatic environments, causing severe saprolegniasis and leading to significant economic losses in the aquaculture industry. Thus far, the prevention and control of saprolegniasis face a shortage of medications. Linalool, a natural antibiotic alternative found in various essential oils, exhibits promising antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens. In this study, the specific role of linalool in protecting S. parasitica infection at both in vitro and in vivo levels was investigated. Linalool showed multifaceted anti-oomycetes potential by both of antimicrobial efficacy and immunomodulatory efficacy. For in vitro test, linalool exhibited strong anti-oomycetes activity and mode of action included: (1) Linalool disrupted the cell membrane of the mycelium, causing the intracellular components leak out; (2) Linalool prohibited ribosome function, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis and ultimately affecting mycelium growth. Surprisingly, meanwhile we found the potential immune protective mechanism of linalool in the in vivo test: (1) Linalool enhanced the complement and coagulation system which in turn activated host immune defense and lysate S. parasitica cells; (2) Linalool promoted wound healing, tissue repair, and phagocytosis to cope with S. parasitica infection; (3) Linalool positively modulated the immune response by increasing the abundance of beneficial Actinobacteriota; (4) Linalool stimulated the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to lyse S. parasitica cells. In all, our findings showed that linalool possessed multifaceted anti-oomycetes potential which would be a promising natural antibiotic alternative to cope with S. parasitica infection in the aquaculture industry.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Iti Mehta, Jacob B Hogins ... Larry Reitzer
    Research Article

    Polyamines are biologically ubiquitous cations that bind to nucleic acids, ribosomes, and phospholipids and, thereby, modulate numerous processes, including surface motility in Escherichia coli. We characterized the metabolic pathways that contribute to polyamine-dependent control of surface motility in the commonly used strain W3110 and the transcriptome of a mutant lacking a putrescine synthetic pathway that was required for surface motility. Genetic analysis showed that surface motility required type 1 pili, the simultaneous presence of two independent putrescine anabolic pathways, and modulation by putrescine transport and catabolism. An immunological assay for FimA—the major pili subunit, reverse transcription quantitative PCR of fimA, and transmission electron microscopy confirmed that pili synthesis required putrescine. Comparative RNAseq analysis of a wild type and ΔspeB mutant which exhibits impaired pili synthesis showed that the latter had fewer transcripts for pili structural genes and for fimB which codes for the phase variation recombinase that orients the fim operon promoter in the ON phase, although loss of speB did not affect the promoter orientation. Results from the RNAseq analysis also suggested (a) changes in transcripts for several transcription factor genes that affect fim operon expression, (b) compensatory mechanisms for low putrescine which implies a putrescine homeostatic network, and (c) decreased transcripts of genes for oxidative energy metabolism and iron transport which a previous genetic analysis suggests may be sufficient to account for the pili defect in putrescine synthesis mutants. We conclude that pili synthesis requires putrescine and putrescine concentration is controlled by a complex homeostatic network that includes the genes of oxidative energy metabolism.