MicroRNA-218 instructs proper assembly of hippocampal networks
- Brigham Young University, United States
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Rockefeller University, United States
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
- Scripps Research Institute, United States
- University of California, San Diego, United States
- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics A Buzzati-Traverso, Italy
Abstract
The assembly of the mammalian brain is orchestrated by temporally coordinated waves of gene expression. Post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs (miRNAs) is a key aspect of this program. Indeed, deletion of neuron-enriched miRNAs induces strong developmental phenotypes, and miRNA levels are altered in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the mechanisms used by miRNAs to instruct brain development remain largely unexplored. Here, we identified miR-218 as a critical regulator of hippocampal assembly. MiR-218 is highly expressed in the hippocampus and enriched in both excitatory principal neurons (PNs) and GABAergic inhibitory interneurons (INs). Early life inhibition of miR-218 results in an adult brain with a predisposition to seizures. Changes in gene expression in the absence of miR-218 suggest that network assembly is impaired. Indeed, we find that miR-218 inhibition results in the disruption of early depolarizing GABAergic signaling, structural defects in dendritic spines, and altered intrinsic membrane excitability. Conditional knockout of Mir218-2 in INs, but not PNs, is sufficient to recapitulate long-term instability. Finally, de-repressing Kif21b and Syt13, two miR-218 targets, phenocopies the effects on early synchronous network activity induced by miR-218 inhibition. Taken together, the data suggest that miR-218 orchestrates formative events in PNs and INs to produce stable networks.
Data availability
RNA-seq data has been deposited to GEO (accession number GSE241245)
-
MicroRNA-218 instructs proper assembly of hippocampal networksNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE241245.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (1 S10 OD026817-01)
- Giordano Lippi
Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (1R01NS092705)
- Michele Zoli
National Institutes of Health (2R01NS012601)
- Darwin K Berg
National Institutes of Health (1R21NS087342)
- Darwin K Berg
National Institutes of Health (1R01NS121223)
- Giordano Lippi
National Institutes of Health (1R01NS092705)
- Christina Gross
Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (22XT-0016,21FT-0027)
- Darwin K Berg
Whitehall Foundation (2018-12-55)
- Giordano Lippi
Autism Speaks (12923)
- Norjin Zolboot
American Epilepsy Society (12923)
- Andrea Hartzell
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures at UCSD, CCHMH and SRI were performed as approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees and according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Behavioral and in vivo experiments at UNIMORE were conducted in accordance with the European Community Council Directive (86/609/EEC) of November 24, 1986, and approved by the ethics committee (authorization number: 37/2018PR).
Copyright
© 2023, Taylor et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,234
- views
-
- 186
- downloads
-
- 10
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
MicroRNA-218 instructs proper assembly of hippocampal networks
eLife 12:e82729.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82729
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
People selectively help others based on perceptions of their merit or need. Here, we develop a neurocomputational account of how these social perceptions translate into social choice. Using a novel fMRI social perception task, we show that both merit and need perceptions recruited the brain’s social inference network. A behavioral computational model identified two non-exclusive mechanisms underlying variance in social perceptions: a consistent tendency to perceive others as meritorious/needy (bias) and a propensity to sample and integrate normative evidence distinguishing high from low merit/need in other people (sensitivity). Variance in people’s merit (but not need) bias and sensitivity independently predicted distinct aspects of altruism in a social choice task completed months later. An individual’s merit bias predicted context-independent variance in people’s overall other-regard during altruistic choice, biasing people toward prosocial actions. An individual’s merit sensitivity predicted context-sensitive discrimination in generosity toward high and low merit recipients by influencing other- and self-regard during altruistic decision-making. This context-sensitive perception–action link was associated with activation in the right temporoparietal junction. Together, these findings point toward stable, biologically based individual differences in perceptual processes related to abstract social concepts like merit, and suggest that these differences may have important behavioral implications for an individual’s tendency toward favoritism or discrimination in social settings.
-
- Neuroscience
Purkinje cell (PC) dendrites are optimized to integrate the vast cerebellar input array and drive the sole cortical output. PCs are classically seen as stereotypical computational units, yet mouse PCs are morphologically diverse and those with multi-branched structure can receive non-canonical climbing fiber (CF) multi-innervation that confers independent compartment-specific signaling. While otherwise uncharacterized, human PCs are universally multi-branched. Do they exceed allometry to achieve enhanced integrative capacities relative to mouse PCs? To answer this, we used several comparative histology techniques in adult human and mouse to analyze cellular morphology, parallel fiber (PF) and CF input arrangement, and regional PC demographics. Human PCs are substantially larger than previously described; they exceed allometric constraint by cortical thickness and are the largest neuron in the brain with 6–7 cm total dendritic length. Unlike mouse, human PC dendrites ramify horizontally to form a multi-compartment motif that we show can receive multiple CFs. Human spines are denser (6.9 vs 4.9 spines/μm), larger (~0.36 vs 0.29 μm), and include an unreported ‘spine cluster’ structure—features that may be congruent with enhanced PF association and amplification as human-specific adaptations. By extrapolation, human PCs may receive 500,000 to 1 million synaptic inputs compared with 30–40,000 in mouse. Collectively, human PC morphology and input arrangement is quantitatively and qualitatively distinct from rodent. Multi-branched PCs are more prevalent in posterior and lateral cerebellum, co-varying with functional boundaries, supporting the hypothesis that this morphological motif permits expanded input multiplexing and may subserve task-dependent needs for input association.
