The slingshot phosphatase 2 is required for acrosome biogenesis during spermatogenesis in mice

  1. Ke Xu
  2. Xianwei Su
  3. Kailun Fang
  4. Yue Lv
  5. Tao Huang
  6. Mengjing Li
  7. Ziqi Wang
  8. Yingying Yin
  9. Tahir Muhammad
  10. Shangming Liu
  11. Xiangfeng Chen
  12. Jing Jiang
  13. Jinsong Li
  14. Wai-Yee Chan
  15. Jinlong Ma
  16. Gang Lu  Is a corresponding author
  17. Zi-Jiang Chen  Is a corresponding author
  18. Hongbin Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Shandong University, China
  2. Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, China

Abstract

The acrosome is a membranous organelle positioned in the anterior portion of the sperm head and is essential for male fertility. Acrosome biogenesis requires the dynamic cytoskeletal shuttling of vesicles towards nascent acrosome which is regulated by a series of accessory proteins. However, much remains unknown about the molecular basis underlying this process. Here, we generated Ssh2 knock-out (KO) mice and HA-tagged Ssh2 knock-in (KI) mice to define the functions of Slingshot phosphatase 2 (SSH2) in spermatogenesis and demonstrated that as a regulator of actin remodeling, SSH2 is essential for acrosome biogenesis and male fertility. In Ssh2 KO males, spermatogenesis was arrested at the early spermatid stage with increased apoptotic index and the impaired acrosome biogenesis was characterized by defective transport/fusion of proacrosomal vesicles. Moreover, disorganized F-actin structures accompanied by excessive phosphorylation of COFILIN were observed in the testes of Ssh2 KO mice. Collectively, our data reveal a modulatory role for SSH2 in acrosome biogenesis through COFILIN-mediated actin remodeling and the indispensability of this phosphatase in male fertility in mice.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-7 and Figure supplement.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ke Xu

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xianwei Su

    CUHK-SDU Joint Laboratory on Reproductive Genetics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kailun Fang

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2456-6423
  4. Yue Lv

    Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tao Huang

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7086-570X
  6. Mengjing Li

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ziqi Wang

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Yingying Yin

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tahir Muhammad

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shangming Liu

    School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiangfeng Chen

    Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jing Jiang

    Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biolog, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jinsong Li

    Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biolog, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3456-662X
  14. Wai-Yee Chan

    CUHK-SDU Joint Laboratory on Reproductive Genetics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jinlong Ma

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Gang Lu

    CUHK-SDU Joint Laboratory on Reproductive Genetics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
    For correspondence
    lugang@cuhk.edu.hk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Zi-Jiang Chen

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    For correspondence
    chenzijiang@hotmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6637-6631
  18. Hongbin Liu

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
    For correspondence
    hongbin_sduivf@aliyun.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2550-7492

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2700500)

  • Jinlong Ma

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071699)

  • Hongbin Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771538)

  • Hongbin Liu

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2702600)

  • Hongbin Liu

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2020RU001)

  • Zi-Jiang Chen

Shandong First Medical University (Academic Promotion Programme,2019U001)

  • Zi-Jiang Chen

Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2021ZDSYS16)

  • Hongbin Liu

Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shandong Province (ZR2021JQ27)

  • Hongbin Liu

Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province (Program for Young Experts,tsqn202103192)

  • Hongbin Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Basic Science Center Program,31988101)

  • Zi-Jiang Chen

Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong (2020ZLYS02)

  • Zi-Jiang Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards approved by the Animal Use Committee of the School of Medicine, Shandong University, for the care and use of laboratory animals. The research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shandong University. (Reference Number: 2019#057).

Copyright

© 2023, Xu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,279
    views
  • 279
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ke Xu
  2. Xianwei Su
  3. Kailun Fang
  4. Yue Lv
  5. Tao Huang
  6. Mengjing Li
  7. Ziqi Wang
  8. Yingying Yin
  9. Tahir Muhammad
  10. Shangming Liu
  11. Xiangfeng Chen
  12. Jing Jiang
  13. Jinsong Li
  14. Wai-Yee Chan
  15. Jinlong Ma
  16. Gang Lu
  17. Zi-Jiang Chen
  18. Hongbin Liu
(2023)
The slingshot phosphatase 2 is required for acrosome biogenesis during spermatogenesis in mice
eLife 12:e83129.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83129

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83129

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sara Jaber, Eliana Eldawra ... Franck Toledo
    Research Article

    Missense ‘hotspot’ mutations localized in six p53 codons account for 20% of TP53 mutations in human cancers. Hotspot p53 mutants have lost the tumor suppressive functions of the wildtype protein, but whether and how they may gain additional functions promoting tumorigenesis remain controversial. Here, we generated Trp53Y217C, a mouse model of the human hotspot mutant TP53Y220C. DNA damage responses were lost in Trp53Y217C/Y217C (Trp53YC/YC) cells, and Trp53YC/YC fibroblasts exhibited increased chromosome instability compared to Trp53-/- cells. Furthermore, Trp53YC/YC male mice died earlier than Trp53-/- males, with more aggressive thymic lymphomas. This correlated with an increased expression of inflammation-related genes in Trp53YC/YC thymic cells compared to Trp53-/- cells. Surprisingly, we recovered only one Trp53YC/YC female for 22 Trp53YC/YC males at weaning, a skewed distribution explained by a high frequency of Trp53YC/YC female embryos with exencephaly and the death of most Trp53YC/YC female neonates. Strikingly, however, when we treated pregnant females with the anti-inflammatory drug supformin (LCC-12), we observed a fivefold increase in the proportion of viable Trp53YC/YC weaned females in their progeny. Together, these data suggest that the p53Y217C mutation not only abrogates wildtype p53 functions but also promotes inflammation, with oncogenic effects in males and teratogenic effects in females.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Mengjie Li, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang
    Research Advance

    Stem cell self-renewal often relies on asymmetric fate determination governed by niche signals and/or cell-intrinsic factors but how these regulatory mechanisms cooperate to promote asymmetric fate decision remains poorly understood. In adult Drosophila midgut, asymmetric Notch (N) signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal by promoting ISC differentiation into enteroblast (EB). We have previously shown that epithelium-derived Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) promotes ISC self-renewal by antagonizing N pathway activity (Tian and Jiang, 2014). Here, we show that loss of BMP signaling results in ectopic N pathway activity even when the N ligand Delta (Dl) is depleted, and that the N inhibitor Numb acts in parallel with BMP signaling to ensure a robust ISC self-renewal program. Although Numb is asymmetrically segregated in about 80% of dividing ISCs, its activity is largely dispensable for ISC fate determination under normal homeostasis. However, Numb becomes crucial for ISC self-renewal when BMP signaling is compromised. Whereas neither Mad RNA interference nor its hypomorphic mutation led to ISC loss, inactivation of Numb in these backgrounds resulted in stem cell loss due to precocious ISC-to-EB differentiation. Furthermore, we find that numb mutations resulted in stem cell loss during midgut regeneration in response to epithelial damage that causes fluctuation in BMP pathway activity, suggesting that the asymmetrical segregation of Numb into the future ISC may provide a fail-save mechanism for ISC self-renewal by offsetting BMP pathway fluctuation, which is important for ISC maintenance in regenerative guts.