Microglial motility is modulated by neuronal activity and correlates with dendritic spine plasticity in the hippocampus of awake mice

Abstract

Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, play a complex role in health and disease. They actively survey the brain parenchyma by physically interacting with other cells and structurally shaping the brain. Yet the mechanisms underlying microglial motility and significance for synapse stability, especially in the hippocampus during adulthood, remain widely unresolved. Here we investigated the effect of neuronal activity on microglial motility and the implications for the formation and survival of dendritic spines on hippocampal CA1 neurons in vivo. We used repetitive two-photon in vivo imaging in the hippocampus of awake and anesthetized mice to simultaneously study the motility of microglia and their interaction with dendritic spines. We found that CA3 to CA1 input is sufficient to modulate microglial process motility. Simultaneously, more dendritic spines emerged in mice after awake compared to anesthetized imaging. Interestingly, the rate of microglial contacts with individual dendritic spines and dendrites was associated with the stability, removal, and emergence of dendritic spines. These results suggest that microglia might sense neuronal activity via neurotransmitter release and actively participate in synaptic rewiring of the hippocampal neural network during adulthood. Further, this study has profound relevance for hippocampal learning and memory processes.

Data availability

Data related to the manuscript are available according to the FAIR principles via Dryad

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Felix Christopher Nebeling

    Neuroimmunology and Imaging Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    felix.nebeling@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Stefanie Poll

    Neuroimmunology and Imaging Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5301-2791
  3. Lena Christine Schmid

    Neuroimmunology and Imaging Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Julia Steffen

    Neuroimmunology and Imaging Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kevin Keppler

    Light Microscopy Facility, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Manuel Mittag

    Neuroimmunology and Imaging Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Martin Fuhrmann

    Neuroimmunology and Imaging Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
    For correspondence
    martin.fuhrmann@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7672-2913

Funding

European Research Council (865618)

  • Manuel Mittag
  • Martin Fuhrmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1089,C01)

  • Stefanie Poll
  • Martin Fuhrmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1089,B06)

  • Julia Steffen
  • Martin Fuhrmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP2395)

  • Martin Fuhrmann

ERA-NET NEURON (MicroSynDep)

  • Felix Christopher Nebeling
  • Martin Fuhrmann

ERA-NET NEURON (MicroSchiz)

  • Felix Christopher Nebeling
  • Stefanie Poll
  • Martin Fuhrmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This and all procedures described were in accordance with the intern regulations of the DZNE and animal experimental protocols approved by the government of North Rhine Westphalia (84-02.04.2017.A098).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Laura L Colgin, University of Texas at Austin, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 10, 2019 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 1, 2022
  3. Accepted: February 3, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: February 7, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 22, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Nebeling et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,338
    Page views
  • 522
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Felix Christopher Nebeling
  2. Stefanie Poll
  3. Lena Christine Schmid
  4. Julia Steffen
  5. Kevin Keppler
  6. Manuel Mittag
  7. Martin Fuhrmann
(2023)
Microglial motility is modulated by neuronal activity and correlates with dendritic spine plasticity in the hippocampus of awake mice
eLife 12:e83176.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83176

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Stijn A Nuiten, Jan Willem de Gee ... Simon van Gaal
    Research Article

    Perceptual decisions about sensory input are influenced by fluctuations in ongoing neural activity, most prominently driven by attention and neuromodulator systems. It is currently unknown if neuromodulator activity and attention differentially modulate perceptual decision-making and/or whether neuromodulatory systems in fact control attentional processes. To investigate the effects of two distinct neuromodulatory systems and spatial attention on perceptual decisions, we pharmacologically elevated cholinergic (through donepezil) and catecholaminergic (through atomoxetine) levels in humans performing a visuo-spatial attention task, while we measured electroencephalography (EEG). Both attention and catecholaminergic enhancement improved decision-making at the behavioral and algorithmic level, as reflected in increased perceptual sensitivity and the modulation of the drift rate parameter derived from drift diffusion modeling. Univariate analyses of EEG data time-locked to the attentional cue, the target stimulus, and the motor response further revealed that attention and catecholaminergic enhancement both modulated pre-stimulus cortical excitability, cue- and stimulus-evoked sensory activity, as well as parietal evidence accumulation signals. Interestingly, we observed both similar, unique, and interactive effects of attention and catecholaminergic neuromodulation on these behavioral, algorithmic, and neural markers of the decision-making process. Thereby, this study reveals an intricate relationship between attentional and catecholaminergic systems and advances our understanding about how these systems jointly shape various stages of perceptual decision-making.

    1. Neuroscience
    Manfred G Kitzbichler, Daniel Martins ... Neil A Harrison
    Research Article Updated

    The relationship between obesity and human brain structure is incompletely understood. Using diffusion-weighted MRI from ∼30,000 UK Biobank participants, we test the hypothesis that obesity (waist-to-hip ratio, WHR) is associated with regional differences in two micro-structural MRI metrics: isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF), an index of free water, and intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF), an index of neurite density. We observed significant associations with obesity in two coupled but distinct brain systems: a prefrontal/temporal/striatal system associated with ISOVF and a medial temporal/occipital/striatal system associated with ICVF. The ISOVF~WHR system colocated with expression of genes enriched for innate immune functions, decreased glial density, and high mu opioid (MOR) and other neurotransmitter receptor density. Conversely, the ICVF~WHR system co-located with expression of genes enriched for G-protein coupled receptors and decreased density of MOR and other receptors. To test whether these distinct brain phenotypes might differ in terms of their underlying shared genetics or relationship to maps of the inflammatory marker C-reactive Protein (CRP), we estimated the genetic correlations between WHR and ISOVF (rg = 0.026, P = 0.36) and ICVF (rg = 0.112, P < 9×10−4) as well as comparing correlations between WHR maps and equivalent CRP maps for ISOVF and ICVF (P<0.05). These correlational results are consistent with a two-way mechanistic model whereby genetically determined differences in neurite density in the medial temporal system may contribute to obesity, whereas water content in the prefrontal system could reflect a consequence of obesity mediated by innate immune system activation.